Man, I really dig Billy Graham, but Tito Santana is another one of those guys in the 80's that was over looked and much, much better then he is given credit for. It's a shame that the only "world" title he received was a pre-ECW ECW championship that was hot potatoed between himself, and Don Muraco. If TNA is WWE Reject land, then you might want to look at ECW in it's early days.
Anyways, Santana was damn good in the ring and was always a good match during the first decade of Wrestlemania. Graham is damn impressive, but he was more known for the gimmick then the ring stuff. He could be brutal at times, but I think Santana has enough.
Anyways, Santana was damn good in the ring and was always a good match during the first decade of Wrestlemania. Graham is damn impressive, but he was more known for the gimmick then the ring stuff. He could be brutal at times, but I think Santana has enough.