IrishCanadian25
Going on 10 years with WrestleZone
I think Nathan Jones has name recognition. And do you know what that name reminds people?
That he sucked.
People vote for Jones because his name is familiar. But when he is in the tournament, staring down men like Hogan, Austin, Benoit, etc., people will suddenly remember that he wasn't any good and accomplished nothing. Solid posters will not be able to convince you otherwise.
Guys like O'Connor and Garea? There's research to be done that MAY get them over some of the so-called "big guns." It's the same philosophy that got Jushin Liger over so many in the tournament this year - solid posters knew where to research and educated us all.
O'Connor, Garea, Rip Morgan. Those are my 3, but I won't vote unless there is a tie.
That he sucked.
People vote for Jones because his name is familiar. But when he is in the tournament, staring down men like Hogan, Austin, Benoit, etc., people will suddenly remember that he wasn't any good and accomplished nothing. Solid posters will not be able to convince you otherwise.
Guys like O'Connor and Garea? There's research to be done that MAY get them over some of the so-called "big guns." It's the same philosophy that got Jushin Liger over so many in the tournament this year - solid posters knew where to research and educated us all.
O'Connor, Garea, Rip Morgan. Those are my 3, but I won't vote unless there is a tie.