I'm sorry about that then, must of been someone else.
No problem.
Ummm....artists don't release their own albums Slyfox. Not unless they own a record company (or subdivision), or they're releasing it independently out of their damn basement. Record companies release albums, and they do for one reason: money. The record business is as much of a BUSINESS as wrestling is Sly. And if an artist can release an album for "musical gain" then why can't a wrestler be considered great for his artistic ability as well?Because putting together a great match is an art form.
No, because artists still have free license to create any music they wish. It's not like wrestling. In wrestling, the workers are contracted and are expected to do as told. In music, record companies contract musicians, but leave the music decision up to the band. Completely different.
Van Gogh was not even slightly popular as an artist until after he died. Does that mean his paintings weren't good because he wasn't popular? When is art EVER popular? It hasn't been for the last 200 years, and if you think that art is about popularity, then you clearly know jack shit about what art is.
You don't get it, and I don't know how to make it any more clear.
Wrestling is an entertainment medium. It exists solely on the basis of entertainment value. If it's not entertaining, it's dead. You can't continue to make "wrestling art" if you don't have any money, because you can't afford it. The ART in wrestling is being able to work matches that entertain a large fanbase and create revenue. That's how you tell a wrestler is good. Wrestling is entirely predicated upon appealing to a fanbase. Painting is not, which is where you parallel fails. Wrestling appeals to people because it has to. Wrestling has to have people, paintings do not.
I don't know how to explain it any further than that.
Then I guess wrestling is dead and buried, because every single wrestling fan from the age of 5 to 55 enjoys watching shows of athleticism by wrestlers. Except for you apparently. But the other 99.9% of wrestling fans enjoy that. Thats why they go crazy every time Jeff Hardy does the swanton. If you think fans don't enjoy shows of athleticism, than you clearly don't know much about wrestling fans.
Then John Cena must be the most athletic man in wrestling, because there is no doubt he's the biggest draw. And if the only thing fans like is athleticism, then John Cena must be the most athletic man in wrestling.
By your standards.
And it's not just "flips". If you think that shit is easy, go try it yourself. NBA players could never do what guys like Shelton Benjamin can do. And you know why? Because Shelton Benjamin is a better athlete then a basketball player. He's mort athletic then Kobe Bryant, Tim Duncan, all of em. I'd like to see any NBA player jump from the mat to the top rope in one perfect little leap. I'll guarantee you they wouldn't be able to do half of the things wrestlers do.
I'd like to see Shelton Benjamin dunk a basketball. I'd like to see Charlie Haas guard Allen Iverson. I'd like to see Triple H line up at fullback and block Shawn Merriman. I'd like to see...well you get my point.
I'm not saying wrestlers are not athletic. I never said that. I'm saying that to watch professional wrestling simply for athleticism is entirely missing the boat on what makes professional wrestling good. Obviously, unless you want to tell me that John Cena is the most athletic wrestler in the world right now, fans don't watch wrestling simply because of athletic ability.
Sorry Slyfox, but you sir are the biggest smark of 'em all. And to be criticizing us for judging wrestlers on their athletic ability, when you judge them on their selling ability, is ridiculous.
No no...I don't judge them on their selling ability. VINCE MCMAHON judges them on their selling ability. And their selling ability is indicative of their wrestling ability. How do I know this? Because no one pays to watch someone who is a bad wrestler and is boring. Do you?
When will you ever realize that Vince McMahon could get any muscled guy off the street, throw him in that ring with the same character as Cena and make him the "mega babyface", and it would be the same thing as Cena?
Never, because that is completely stupid. If that's all it took, then how come every wrestling in the WWE doesn't get that treatment? How come the WWE doesn't just go hire every bodybuilder they can find and have them wrestle? Apparently all it takes is muscles and a character to be a mega draw. How come guys like Cena come around so rarely?
Seriously, you prided yourself earlier on being objective about Cena. Use some of that objectivity here. You're not making sense at all.
The fans like who Vince TELLS them to like.
Bullshit. Never. Vince McMahon puts those who draw in important positions, and those who do not in unimportant positions. Vince McMahon is a seller, the fans are the buyers. And when the buyers want a certain commodity, McMahon gives it to them. It's basic economics.
Seriously Slyfox, stop. Stop talking to me and everyone else here as though we were your 8 year old child, we aren't fucking morons. Stop being so condescending.
Quit saying ignorant things and maybe I will? I mean, I have Wes trying to prove Cena's not a draw, when every bit of evidence is to the contrary, people saying that Cena only has 5 moves when I can list about 13 off the top of my head in 10 seconds, I have people saying that Cena can't wrestle (which makes no sense considering his occupation), I have you saying that anyone can do what Cena does while ignoring the fact that if this were true than there should be a million Cenas running around the WWE.
Some people in here don't understand basic business principles and concepts, and refuse to believe them even when I slap them in the face with them. How else am I supposed to react?