Generalize much? Oh, this is going to be fun. I didn't read all that, but I'm assuming it was full of whining and bitchy complaints because this post seems to be full of that. Anyway, let's get to it.
Speaking of Cena and im sure the Cena lovers will hammer me on continuing to bash him but WTF is his match always the main event.
I wouldn't label myself a cena fan (but I can tolerate the man), but can I still make fun of you? Don't answer that, rhetorical question because I'm going to anyway. You've been warned
This phony, egotistical, selfish prick
You know he's like this...how exactly? You have him on speed dial?....Wait. Bull Buchanan, is that you? How's your dog?
has to be the final match of every damn ppv. Cena by himself has devalued Punk's title reign.
Uh...not really. Let's not be stupid now. But I'll play along, tell us oh great one: how has Cena not being a title match, and being away from the title scene for the last while devalued the great cm punk's 200+ day title reign
The value of the WWE title is 2nd fiddle to Cena and it's pathetic, because it's suppose to be the most important thing in wrestling.
get this man a labar t-shirt, because IT'S STILL REAL TO HIM DAMN IT
However, Vince and his coddling to the little kiddos makes it's devalued.
Yes. How DARE Vince McMahon run the company his way, and how DARE little kids like a certain wrestler, forcing parents to buy merchandise. Let's burn them all. maybe then Vince will croke as you say. Are you even reading what you write before you post it, or are you really this dense? It's not 1997 anymore, maybe take a step outside and come to terms with the fact that things have to change. Just because you don't care for them doesn't make it bad. You can do it, I believe in you.
The title match not closing the show once in a blue moon is okay but 7 ppv's in a row is pathetic.
eh. Okay, one point for you. world title matches probably should close out the show once in awhile, I can't really argue this. Damn it.
Punk/Bryan should have closed the show not only because it's a WWE title match but it also would have brought a possible surprise element with a chance of their being a cash in at the end. Again predictable boring crap!!!
Yes. Because had it happened, nobody would have called a cash in at all. After all, not like they didn't tease it with Sheamus's match, and it's not like the audience was chanting for Ziggler. Nope.
Punk/Bryan was a great match I can't deny that. However, if your not going to do a title switch at least have AJ more involved.
Why? Why have her be more involved, I don't...I don't understand her reasoning her, except it being something YOU want. Screw the people in the match, as long as you're entertained. Do you perhaps subscribe to the Vince Russo guide to everyday life?
The ending was pathetic a sad look on her face and she's still torn. So what does this mean this feud continues. It can't because SuperCena vs Punk will happen at SummerSlam.
Again: You know this how? You get an advanced card, or something? Hook us up? Who's Ryback squashing? Will Clay be there? And for the love of god, does David Otunga have his sweatervest ready?! There's still a lot of time until Summerslam, so cool your tits. Nothing's set in stone
and I'm 120% you're just speculating. my 120 trumps your 100. Math's a bitch, isn't it.
Again WWE how about some creativity, oh wait everything is about the 1000th Raw and this PPV means crap.
yes. YOU didn't like it, so it must have been terrible. I can totally understand this logic. Like, someone once said Raven wasn't one of the top promo cutters of his time, so I punched him in the gut, took my toys and went home. That'll teach THEM not to like who I like
Ziggler winning the other MitB again wheres the surprise factor.
Had he won before? It wasn't like it was Punk or Edge who've had numerous mitb wins. so I'd say that Ziggler becoming MITB for the first time was a surprise. Is he who I personally would have chose? Probably not, as I was rooting for Sandow, but Ziggler, even though I may not like him personally makes sense. Who are they going to have win? Christian? Tensai? Tyson Kidd?
Ziggler didn't need the case he practically is already a main eventer
so being stuck in mid card is now practically being a main eventer? KOFI KINGSTON/SANTINO . MAIN EVENT. BOOK IT. Drew McIntyre can sell popcorn in the stands. I'd tend to think that Dolph here would disagree about his "not needing the briefcase." but fine. Let's play fantasy booker: Who do you have winning sd's case then.
So this ending was stupid as well as all the botches in the match.
a lot of things here are stupid. almost none are in the match
No cash in's/title changes. I was certain one of the titles would change hand or one of the winners would cash in but nope same old predicable BS.
Yes. because by law there has to be a title change once per show, or else the show has been a total waste. They added that in at the end of the Obamacare ruling, so I understand your dilemma
Ryback and a Divas's match follow the Punk/Bryan match, really? really? really?
yep. And quit using that overused "really?really?really?" statement to drive your point across. it's beneath y....well it's beneath us, the readers. Either make your point or gtfo with it
I think one of those matches is stupid but I understand why you would throw a filler match in there after the title match but two of them including a stupid diva's match. Come on WWE this was stupid as well.
Well, how can we argue with the word of someone named AttitudeEra? Very easily, I'm finding, but for the sake of argument let's hear it. What would have done to undo this apparent travesty of justice that was a Ryback AND *gasp* a divas match?
Other then Lesnar/HHH at SS their is really no reason to look forward to SummerSlam. We all know it's going to be Punk/Cena another boring face vs face match.
No, you THINK that. there's a difference between what you think will happen and what will happen. Not that I expect you to understand that, but since nobody here is from the future, we don't know for certain what will happen at summerslam. What you're doing, is called speculating. Say it with me: sp-eck-u-la-ting.
Which everyone in there brother knows that Cena will win and it will probably be clean. We all know Vince doesn't have the balls to let Punk win, especially clean. Again more predictable crap!
Yes. Because Cena's won every main event PPV he's been in as of late...Oh wait...
The only way this Cena thing can work out and be a plus is if he cashes in and loses.
How would that work out? At all? Please tell me. Just because you don't like the match doesn't mean that what you propose will be "better" so unless you have verified sources to back up your claims, shut up.
Im sure WWE doesn't have the courage to do that though.
because it would be stupid.
Lets say they do and Cena loses, im sure it wont be clean and then they will have a rematch at Night of Champions and Cena will win.
Sure. why not. Let's also pretend I'm Godzilla and America's next top model. It's always fun to pretend every now and then.
If there is anyone in the IWC that honestly doesn't believe Cena wont beat Punk and win the feud and take the title back please chime in.
Punk has beaten Cena. Numerous times. Logic states that should they happen to face at SS, or NoC, there should be no clear cut winner. so this "100% chance of cena winning" defense of your's is bullshit.
But sadly I am 100% sure Cena will have the belt in the next two months
We don't care.
Sorry for the long rant but I am pissed. WWE you disapoint me!
I'm sure they'll cry themselves to sleep for losing such a great fan.