QUOTE]I find it ridiculous that WWE still allows this man to write his own ticket even though he's past his prime and resting/nursing injuries for at least half of the calendar year.[/QUOTE]
And despite those injuries he still main evented a damn good 'Mania match with Shawn, and had an awesome math with Rey back in January. 'Taker IMO is the only GIANT who's ever had any really good matches with Mysterio.
The Undertaker is NOT overrated! Why because he's been the guy who's done, and been through it all. Vince can depend on him for just about anything. So he gets injured sometimes...big deal! When you've been going at it for 20 years, and trying to sell the product as hard as he has, it's going to happen. But what does he do? Despite being banged up, he still goes out there and gives everything he possibly can. Half the roster can't even do that HEALTHY!
I'm willing to admit, this day and age, he doesen't make the dent in the numbers that he used too, but he's still a value asset to the company, and he's still one of the most over superstars on the roster.
He was destined to be a true star. The fans CHOSE him, to be popular first off, nearly 20 years ago. He was already getting pops during his FIRST Wrestlemania match, when the streak didn't even exist. By the time he had some pretty good success against Warrior, he was ready for Hogan, and the crowd there was 60-40. I'm aware 'Taker at times has been the guy called upon to be a main event guy when the chips are down, but much like Bret, he helped keep things head above water, even if the company wasn't always drawing phenomenal numbers.
During the major down period in the mid 90's, 'Taker was a major mover in merch, and one of the most popular crowd attractions for the company alongside Bret. He gained a phenomneal following in a time where WWF needed big name babyfaces to move merch.
By 1997, he was forever a main eventer and nothing less. The Mankind feud took 'Taker to a whole new level, and showed people just how much he can hustle. He gets blamed for a lot of the stinkers of matches that he had in the early part of his career. But look at his opponents.....Kamala, Gonzales, Hughes, Berzerker, Shango, Yoko, Bundy, Kama, Mabel. I mean, what are you expecting??? And fans didn't want to see, or expect to see 'Taker in 5-star matches, they wanted to see him, beat down a guy who was much bigger than he was, it was his power that made him an attaction.
But back to '97, clearly he had to keep things fresh to still be a significant charachter, so he was being put with guys he could work with. Into 1997, he had a banner year with his matches against Bret, Shawn, another one with Mick, and Vader, all of which I have to say, were well above average. His dynamic in the ring had changed, he was becoming a little more human, but I think that let fans relate to him, and root for him more. And let's face it, he'd have to change his style if he's going to main event with guys a lot smaller than him too.
Some of you may say..."But this business is about money!". Well DUH! But besides his merch, lets look at these statistics. Now 1996 was a horrible year for PPV's, but next to 'Mania, the highest was the '96 Rumble, which drew a solid number. Now the Rumble more often than not, does draw. But the attraction of Bret/Taker on PPV, certainly enhanced the value of the event. The rest of the year, you couldn't blame 'Taker for the low numbers anymore than you could blame Shawn or whoever. The company as a whole was in bad shape...
In 1997, sadly, 'Taker has the dubious distinction of headlining the lowest drawing 'Mania of all time. However, the In Your House PPV's recieved a slight increase with 'Taker as champion, and Summerslam '97 with Bret, drew the WWF's highest number on PPV in well over a year at that point. Despite his and Shawn's first match drawing a dissapointing number, Hell in the Cell drew the highest of any In Your House PPV in a year and a half.
By '98, 'Taker was proving he can draw money. The feud with Kane had captured a lot of peoples attention, and while Austin/Michaels feat. Tyson was cleary the big draw at WM14, still, 'Taker/Kane made that card all the more interesting. And the subsuquent Inferno Match, helped Unforgiven draw a solid number. But people often forget..who helped Steve Austin draw some of the biggest money in his career?? Vince McMahon? Absolutely! The Rock?? For sure! But the feud with Vince wouldnt've worked as well of course, unless Vince was throwing the right guys at Austin to encounter. 'Taker was clearly that guy....
The buildup to Summerslam '98 was one of the most hyped non-'mania events ever to this day. The seeds were planted in late May, when 'Taker stood in Austin's corner during the FCA match with Foley. They spent three months making sure this was the epic confrontation it needed to be. They set a non-'Mania PPV record because of it. Think about it...the biggest star in wrestling in the world at the time vs. one of the industry's most recognizable and popular stars of the last decade...it couldn't fail. And it didn't.....
'Taker continued to do great business with Austin well into 1999.....but you culd see he was becoming horribly out of shape, and was dead exhausted. Thankfully he took some time off, and returned in 2000. Now the "American Badass" era, didn't produce much overly memorable outside of his matches with HHH, Flair and Lesnar. I will say that a lot of the stuff from 2000-03, was where a lot of people may have an arguement here. I'll say he didn't seem motivated for a lot of things and people questioned his "politiciking". Especially when it came to the Lesnar stuff.
But here's my view on that...with PPV biz starting to suffer in '02, they wanted to stretch out 'Taker/Lesnar (which didn't draw that much sadly), but I remember smarks throwing a hissy fit about 'Taker not jobbing at Unforgiven. Then they found flaws with his jobbing at No Mercy! Typical Smark "oh I need something to whine about", Vince still saw 'Taker as a commodity still, so obviously he was going to keep him going.
Around 2004, when 'Taker returned as the Deadman, people were just happy to see him playing the charachter again despite some ho-hum feuds with Booker, The Dudley's, JBL and last and most certainly least Heidenreich. But it seemed as though when the feud with Orton began, it lit a whole new fire under him. It seemed as tho he was bringing his game up to another level again, and had at least temporarily was able to stall his injuries.
Then into '06, he had a great match with Angle! Sadly had to contend with Mark Henry & the Great Khali for most of the year, but this isn't to say 'Taker didn't try his damndest to make them look good.
In 2007, he was ready to have a banner year....it didn't quite turn out that way, but man did him and Batista have some wicked chemistry or WHAT? Batista was suffering a backlash in terms of his match quality, but 'Taker lit a fire under him. Both at the beginning and end of the year. They also helped WM 23 earn a milion buys.
2008 was a good year for 'Taker as well, his feud with Edge occupied most of his time, and the produced some great battles, especially at WM24. But of course, 'Taker got stuck with Big Slow again. By '09, 'Taker had Shawn....need I say more? The feud with Punk was a huge dissapointment, but that was the company's fault, not 'Taker's nor Punk's. There match at Breaking Point ended just when they were really finding a common groove.
Of course we all know 2010, after a great match with Rey, epic feud and match with Shawn...he disappeared, had a horrid feud with Kane (like that's anything new), and is gone again.
I understand 'Taker taking some flack due to his difficulties to stay healthy, but to call him overrated, after everything he tries to do for the company, he's still busting his ass out there. 'Taker has enough star power to where he wouldn't even have too anymore, but he's STILL after 20 years, trying his damndest to give people what they want. Some eras of his career are better than others....but he always seemed to be making an impact somehow.