I think most of this falls on WWEs PG campaign and TNA claiming to be all about wrestling... TNA isnt huge, they might be one day but thats irrelevant. Theyre not in a position where they have to worry if critics blast them over having irreputable wrestlers on the roster. As long as their wrestlers arent drunk in the ring or tripping on shrooms, let em fight. RVD and Sabu had trouble with marijuana, so what, sign em. Jeff Hardy? Signed. Angle? Signed. Hell, why not hire New Jack and dig up Chris Benoit. Im not saying this is right or wrong, but for TNA they just need to keep their wrestlers on the roster, and eliminate the outside problems unless its causing a problem in the ring, like the Jeff Hardy fiasco. If critics wanna bash them, so what? In their case, theres no such thing as bad press. Maybe some outsiders will hear "Oh, they held onto a guy with criminal issues? Maybe he's worth checking out". I may get a lot of heat for this, but IDGAF. My point is besides the creative issues, judge them by what they produce on TV, not what they do when the cameras arent running.