Nate DaMac
Fuck erbody but me
I don't get how WWECW wasn't a success.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Does NXT still run on TV over there?
So WWE Main Event is a more successful broadcast than TNA Impact?
I don't get how WWECW wasn't a success.
To support my case, I'd like to say that according to WWE's own numbers Main Event is partially responsible for a 15% rise in revenue from TV rights sales compared to last year.
So Impact is successful for sure - and simultaneously unsuccessful. That discrepancy still hasn't been reconciled.
Whilst you ponder it, follow up question.
Smackdown lost half its audience in ten years. You've stated multiple times before that Impact's success is tied to its ability to expand its audience (I repeat: Impact is unsuccessful because its not growing its audience faster).
If Impacts success can be called into question by a lack of audience expansion; why does a massive audience reduction not make Smackdown unsuccessful?
How was the show doing when Hogan and Hardy weren't there yet?
That's an actual question and not sarcasm.
I never watched it but just looking at the numbers it was doing better than Impact. Also, dropping from about a 1.5 to 1.0 isn't losing 2/3 of you audience, is it? I don't have the viewer numbers, only the ratings. It ran for nearly 4 years in a primetime spot and consistently garnered 1.0 ratings at least.
I'm not trying to stand up for it, I never really watched it. It seemed to me like they killed it for the same reason they're ending the brand split these days.
It was pulling 2.2-2.4 for the first few months, then the number started going down and basically never stopped. It recorded a net ratings loss every single year it ran - which is unusual.
Without knowing the figures, or having seen this, I would speculate that this is almost certainly to do with the fact that their flagship show is 50% longer than it used to be.
Because Smackdown once had that big of an audience, making it a success. Impact's has never been that high or anywhere relatively close to it.
Ahh; I can answer that one. Jessie Sorensen once had his thread hijacked by a discussion about WWE Main Event.
That's the connection that this discussion is build off of.
At what point does making your audience stop watching become a sign of an unsuccessful broadcast?
And whose fault is that?
Zema Ion's - keep up.
Can we just bring this conversation back to Jesse Sorensen. Jesus, at least my Goderrz/Sorensen bumblefuckery somehow contributed to the main topic. Cease this WWE ratings talk!
When it stops being profitable, which is what all these shows' successes should and actually are graded on.
No, my little special snowflake, I mean whose fault is it that this thread got hijacked, because I don't believe it was I who brought Main Event into this.
Can we just bring this conversation back to Jesse Sorensen. Jesus, at least my Goderrz/Sorensen bumblefuckery somehow contributed to the main topic. Cease this WWE ratings talk!
But Superstars got axed by the network. As in the people who commissioned and paid for it stopped paying for it. And you still declare it an overall success.
Who the fuck cares about Jesse Sorensen?