Well the fact of the matter is, the Raw Ratings are in, and the ratings are good news. The first hour did a 3.43 and the second hour jumped a whole point and a half to 3.58, which means that CM Punk is drawing better as champion then Triple H and Randy Orton....
To be fair Shocky, that's like saying one sprinter is faster than the other when one has a humongous wind advantage, if you get what I mean. If you don't: I mean Punk was on Raw the night after two shock victories and pulled off a shock victory himself. The WWE is consciously doing all this to get ratings back up, there's no question, but I think - and I think you'll agree too - that people are tuning in to see the shock champion more than they are to see Punk as champion.
Anyways, that's a good number for the WWE, unlike the verbal backlash you see on here, most people didn't turn out, and in fact, people did indeed stay tuned throughout the night. Again, I still don't see the Harm in the WWE trying something new. In my opinion, it says that the WWE at this point feel that John Cena is bigger then the title and are trying to use the title to make another main eventer, and I have no problem with that
Different is good, and unpredictable is exciting too. However, it doesn't mean we have to like everything we get out of it. It's like, someone goes "I want new ingredients in my sandwiches!" and then gets a steaming turd in his sandwich. I'm not calling Punk a steaming turd, I'm just saying because we wanted something unpredictable, and got something unpredictable, doesn't mean we like what we got. You know what else would have been unpredictable? Executing a young infant on television.
I know you weren't really saying that Shocky, but others had been.
Wow, WWE finally does what people have been saying they need eto do for years now, and push a young talent into the ME, they put the title on some one new, and tried something dare I say somewhat original & different, and now people are bitching about it?!?,
Refer to my "steaming turd" argument. I think it counters this argument pretty well.
whether you like it or not Punk is champ, and Punk becoming champ has both brought the ratings up, and has people talking,
Refer to my "sprinter with humongous wind advantage" argument. I think it counters this argument pretty well.
as far as people saying that Triple H should have dropped the title last night instead of Edge, you seriously need to think about what you are saying here, I mean how much sense would it have made if a face Triple H had interrupt JR, and run his mouth how no one on RAW can take his title, and then have a face Batista (or Cena) come out and beat the hell out of him, and then have a face Punk cash in his MITB title shot on a face Triple H, yeah that would have made loads of sense![]()
Firstly, yeah, if you were to be ******ed and write Triple H as a heel it would make no sense. Thought that was kind of obvious. Far be it for the champion to have a final match on Raw or a final appearance even. Would probably make more sense than SmackDown!'s premier champion showing up at the start of the show. Triple H could have a close match with John Cena or something, then be susceptible to an opportunistic Punk. Only difference then would be Punk being a clear cut heel instead of this whole "What the fuck? He's a face but he needs the heel to get beaten up first before he runs in and pins him?" mess we've got going on.
And before someone starts putting random words in my mouth ("So you're saying Triple H killed the prostitutes on said dates?" is the only way these assumptions could elevate more) I AM NOT BLAMING THIS ON TRIPLE H.