WWE RAW LD 1/03/10 - "The First RAW Of The New Year" | Page 14 | WrestleZone Forums

WWE RAW LD 1/03/10 - "The First RAW Of The New Year"

You would think that with as VAIN as Vince was about Mickie and Candice gaining just a little bit of weight and doing that Piggy James story, that despite how talented Kong is, that he'd not sign her with her weight. Mickie was one hell of a talent, and he was pretty adamant that she had 'issues' which was the punishment in that piggy story.
actually, I think there is a difference. Awesome Kong comes in not being "attractive," and as such doesn't need to maintain an "attractive" form to maintain her standing. Mickie was brought in to be one of these thin athletic Divas, and she "let herself go". Kong isn't brought in for that, and as such won't have that problem.
 
They're expendable. Well at least Candice is. Kong is a hell of a talent.

If A female equivalent of The Big Show counts as a hell of a tallent, then yes she is.

Yes, I know that she's a better wrestler but at the end of the day they have the same fundimental problem. They're too fucking big for anybody to do anything to them, which tends to make for dull matches.
 
actually, I think there is a difference. Awesome Kong comes in not being "attractive," and as such doesn't need to maintain an "attractive" form to maintain her standing. Mickie was brought in to be one of these thin athletic Divas, and she "let herself go". Kong isn't brought in for that, and as such won't have that problem.

I guess if worse comes to worse, since she's had behavior issues before in TNA, the worst that can happen is WWE can always cut her with that 3 strikers gone policy, that's IF they actually stick to their guns.
 
actually, I think there is a difference. Awesome Kong comes in not being "attractive," and as such doesn't need to maintain an "attractive" form to maintain her standing. Mickie was brought in to be one of these thin athletic Divas, and she "let herself go". Kong isn't brought in for that, and as such won't have that problem.
bingo.
Being a beast is Kong's gimmick hence the weight makes sense and actually is integral. Mickie and Candice had a look to maintain as part of their job, and they chose not to do it.
 
If A female equivalent of The Big Show counts as a hell of a tallent, then yes she is.

Yes, I know that she's a better wrestler but at the end of the day they have the same fundimental problem. They're too fucking big for anybody to do anything to them, which tends to make for dull matches.

I agree, who the hell would she fight? The closest she could fight would be Natalya or Beth, but still she could probably beat the shit outta them any day of the week. Kong would HAVE to fight the men's division for a more fair fight. We' get tired of seeing her run roughshod over the ladies.
 
I guess if worse comes to worse, since she's had behavior issues before in TNA, the worst that can happen is WWE can always cut her with that 3 strikers gone policy, that's IF they actually stick to their guns.

That's just for drugs. If you're a cunt you just get fired. No strikes, you're just out.
 
Just saw Cena being advertised for a house show in NYC in March, so maybe they expect him to be back by then.

Santino and Kozlov! AND Tamina is with them! This should be sweet.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,848
Messages
3,300,839
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top