WWE did a pretty good job with the Hall of Fame inductees this year since they had a rather good group where most of them made sense as inductees, compared to most years when only a couple of names per group stick out. Their Hall of Fame is a joke compared to what a real Hall of Fame should be like, although this year they had a good number of deserving entrants that got in. The Four Horsemen were a great choice and each of them should already have been in, other than Flair who of course was inducted 4 years ago. It was cool that he got a second induction alongside his stable.
Then there's Edge. Despite his career tragically ending too soon, he got to leave on a good note. He retained the World Championship at Wrestlemania last year and this year his best friend inducted him into the Hall of Fame. 11 time World Champion, 14 time Tag Team Champion, 5 time Intercontinental Champion, 1 time US Champion, King of the Ring, Royal Rumble winner in 2010, and two successful Money In the Bank cash-in's. Edge has a very impressive list of accomplishments and will go down in history as one of the best. One can only wonder how much more he would have ended up achieving if he had been able to stick around for a longer career.
Simmons and Yokozuna made more sense than many previous inductees, so I wasn't that opposed to seeing them get in. I'm not familiar with Mil Máscaras, so I have no major thoughts there. Tyson shouldn't have gotten in though. I absolutely HATE when they do celebrity inductions. This is why WWE's Hall of Fame is a joke and makes no sense in the grand scheme of things. Guys like Undertaker or The Rock who are legends of the WWE are not in (yet).... but people like Mike Tyson, Drew Carey, or Pete Rose get in based on little appearances? It makes me so angry. At least this year's group of inductees was much more deserving overall than the groups we have seen in previous years.