Ok. First of all, for the most part, Dec. through right up to Wrestlemania is pretty much always predictable. Why? To build up for Mania. Sure, surprises are good, but there needs to be some storyline, emotion, etc. You can't get that with a bunch of surprises. It also makes people look forward to Mania. It's not a new thing. It's happened for as far back as I can remember.
True, true, but atleast back in the attitude era there were undercard matches, such as tag or european title matches which were unpredictable. You would have title changes even leading up to Wrestlemania, maybe to get a superstar more over or to heat up a feud. Nowadays we have Jeff Hardy pointlessly holding onto the IC belt, the tag titles not being defended at all, and the Cruiserweight title has been vacant for nearly 6 months!
If you're right than I'll admit that I am wrong, but that is the most ridiculous statement I've ever heard and is completely non-sensical. Why would Vince put a guy that only half the people like at the top when he could have a guy that about 80% of the people like up there? Plus, he's a fresh merchandise face, which is good to bring in variety, as all the kiddies are loaded w/ Cena shirts and don't need any more.
Jeff Hardy, quite simply, doesn't seem to me as a man who can draw ratings and buyrates. He's a firm upper midcarder, but I find it hard to believe Jeff as being WWE Champion. His mic skills are bad to say the least, and quite frankly, I can't remember the last time there was a WWE Champion who had bad mic skills. And, like I'll explain below, Cena gets more of a reaction than Jeff. And variety means jack if there not selling. I don't know the figures, but WWE made their biggest profit to date last year, surely that has something to do with Cena?
No he isn't. Trips has a presence to him that Cena will never have. He could use the bronco buster as a finisher for awhile and not be phased too badly because Triple H is just plain and simply "the man." There is a reason why he is always on top......other than because of Steph. Cena doesn't have that "is"ness. He's just annoying.
Triple H may have a presence, but there's only a certain amount of ''I'm the game, I'm the best in the business, the title is mine etc etc'' promo's he can do before it gets tiresome. And Cena is annoying, yes, but he gets a reaction. When Trips won the chamber, the crowd was nearly dead silent. When Cena run the Rumble, half the crowd was cheering, half was boo'ing. Like Rock in 2002, he was a face and yet he gots boo's, but that added to his matches (e.g. vs. Hogan at Wrestlemania, vs. Lesnar at SummerSlam). This is the same for Cena (e.g. vs. HHH at WM22, vs. Orton at SummerSlam'07).
This does nothing but hurt your case. The biggest name since the austin/rock era is John Cena, and buyrates are low. What does that say? Maybe it's time to try a little something different.
I'm just saying that Vince WAS hurt when Rock + Austin left. Plus, I used stats from 2003, when Cena was a mere midcarder. Here's some stats which will back my point up:
Royal Rumble
2003 0.95
2004 0.98
2005 0.83
2006 1.31 (Cena vs. Edge)
2007 1.25 (Cena vs. Umaga)
Wrestlemania
2003 1.40
2004 1.63
2005 2.46 (Cena vs. JBL)
2006 2.33 (Cena vs. HHH)
2007 2.97 (Cena vs. HBK)
SummerSlam
2003 0.94
2004 0.94
2005 1.34 (Cena vs. Y2J)
2006 1.35 (Cena vs. Edge)
2007 N/A
Survivor Series
2002 0.86
2003 0.73
2004 0.81
2005 0.94 (Cena vs. Angle)
2006 0.96 (Cena's team vs. Big Show's team)
2007 0.85 (No Cena)
Cena = Buys, Vince needs him as champ to keep them up.