But he's not World Champ.It's not. Becuz Ziggler can do more movez.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
But he's not World Champ.It's not. Becuz Ziggler can do more movez.
The fact that it is on a grander scale makes it more rare. With that, how many times has someone dominated Jack Swagger or Mark Henry? Now how many times has someone completely decimated John Cena?
How doesn't it?
But...but it told a story.............................................................................
The character you play inside the ring is just as much an influence to the crowd as the character you play outside of the ring. It has everything to do with his in ring ability.
Because the amount of moves you do in the ring is obviously what determines how great a wrestler is. So what I get from this is Young Bucks are better than LOD? Or Amazing Red is better than Mysterio? Or Ziggler is better than Lesnar...oh wait...
That's not why he WAS better but yeah, pretty much.
Yup.
Like every wrestler ever. It's called a spot. Just because Ziggler's entire repertoire consists of nothing but them, doesn't make him better.
Again, says the crowd reaction.
So Brock Lesnar intimidating his opponents during build up to their match isn't a story? Yeah fucking right.
But he's not World Champ.
...which ultimately discredits every statement you'll ever make again.Young Bucks are TEN TIMES better wrestlers than the LOD were.
I was gonna reply, but then I saw this....
...which ultimately discredits every statement you'll ever make again.
The fuck is an in-ring story?
That's called working the crowd. There's no story told in matches. Just methods to get a crowd to care about a match.Story being told in the ring during a match? Have you never heard of this? (Serious question, no douchey motives)
Must be why Cena makes so much money for the company, right? He breaks PPV records yearly, more requested than anyone for appearances, mild crossover success in film and music, lasted longer than Steve Austin or The Rock as a top star, has a laundry list of incredible matches, he must fucking suck.Ring ability, Ziggler wrestles better than 90% of the roster except for a rare few. Ziggler overselling is good. Rock, rvd and others oversold just like ziggler but no one says shit about them.
Ziggler has the potential to be a top player in wwe, if given a chance. He isn't bad on the mic, if you let him be himself.
Cena is a garbage wrestler. A disgrace to the sport.
austin can wrestler. But not as good as jericho, benoit and malenko. Austin used to be one of the top technical wrestlers before he get hurt.
Except that wrestling is all about invoking an emotional response from a crowd during your performances. It's not about the moves you do, not even a little bit.Dude, you said Austin had more in-ring ability than Guerrero, Benoit, and Jericho and said Cena was a better wrestler than Ziggler. THAT discredits everyhting you'll ever say.
You're saying Ziggler is better at doing movez than Brock Lesnar. I think that's pretty obvious. You're just not grasping the concept of what a wrestler really is.And obviously you can't comprehend the basics of which I'm saying. A CASUAL fan would know what in-ring ability is but obviously you have no clue.
Once again, lol.Btw LOD were garbage wrestlers. You have no clue what you're saying.
Must be why Cena makes so much money for the company, right? He breaks PPV records yearly, more requested than anyone for appearances, mild crossover success in film and music, lasted longer than Steve Austin or The Rock as a top star, has a laundry list of incredible matches, he must fucking suck.![]()
Wow. John Cena must be the luckiest motherfucker in history if he's been carried by wrestlers for 10 years of pure success. It's clear your opinion is as accurate as your piss poor spelling. Your opinion in if his matches are good or not is irrelevant. They were, are and will be successful and you're just gonna have to suck eggs for being dumb.Here we go![]()
He is making money in an era where wrestling isn't as popular and relevant now.
He lasted longer than austin and rock. But isn't as successful as austin and rock.
cena movies and music arent good.
Cena IMO his matches aren't good or incredible. their decent at best.
Cena gets carried by anyone he is with. Only time cena carried someone was against an out of shape rock at wrestlemania. But rock improved since then.
![]()
Here we go![]()
He is making money in an era where wrestling isn't as popular and relevant now.
He lasted longer than austin and rock. But isn't as successful as austin and rock.
cena movies and music arent good.
Cena IMO his matches aren't good or incredible. their decent at best.
Cena gets carried by anyone he is with. Only time cena carried someone was against an out of shape rock at wrestlemania. But rock improved since then.
![]()
Dude, WHO CARES? A grander scale and rarity of presence has NOTHING to do with in ring ability. How many times Swagger or Henry or Cena has been dominated has NOTHING to do with in-ring ability. Do you have a fucking comprehension problem?
Just because the crowd pops for everything that Ziggler does, does not make every move in his matches a "spot". The fact that the crowd is always electric when Zigglers in a match makes him better.
No, when Brock Lesnar makes an appearance for 5 minutes, his presence is what gets him over. When Brock Lesnars music hits before a match, his presence is in full shine. Once the match starts, presence wears off and ability takes over which is why his matches are considerably more quiet than when Lesnar makes an appearance on Raw. Comprende?
Hello there friend
I like your skilled use of smileys, very inventiveAlso I am amused by how you seem to think that because wrestling generally is less popular than in 1999, that means Cena specifically is instinctively worse than Austin or Rock.
While your assessment that Cena is objectively an inferior actor to an actor who's been to drama school and knows method and shit definitely holds water, I fail to see how that is relevant to a discussion about wrestling - an area in which Cena performs most admirably.
You seem to believe that wrestling is worse therefore the top dog is worse when in truth there is little correlation between the two. Also I'm fairly certain Cena is a proportionally bigger draw compared to the roster of his time when measured against the draw of Austin and the awesome midcard mainstream roster of his own time.Cena has a new colour of t-shirt every six months whereas Steve just had a bunch of skulls and stuff. I'm sure you can imagine which the families that WWE caters to now prefer.
In an earlier post in this thread you assert that "Cena is a garbage wrestler" but I have the suspicion that in the PG era, there are fewer hardcore/gimmick matches than there were in the Attitude Era.I would remind you that to a lot of people, "garbage wrestler" means "one who predominantly participates in deathmatches or similar" such as Mick Foley or those CZW guys, rather than "a shit wrestler". You are most welcome that I have endeavoured to clarify this for you.
I'm sure you must have missed Cena vs. Punk at Money in the Bank 2011, because that match is one I consider incredible. Due to Cena as much as Punk. It takes two to tango after all.
It was wonderful to have the opportunity to reply to a great poster like yourselfHave a nice day!
I find this thread hilarious lol![]()
I state my opinion lol And get bashed. I find it funny
Not in a English class lol spelling and grammar irrelevant.
Its all good.
lol so many wwe marks on this thread.
Just laughing
I find this thread hilarious lol
I state my opinion lol And get bashed. I find it funny
Not in a English class lol spelling and grammar irrelevant.
Its all good.
lol so many wwe marks on this thread.
Just laughing
Do you laugh out loud at everything you read? You must be awkward in public.I find this thread hilarious lol![]()
I state my opinion lol And get bashed. I find it funny
If you want to make your point come off seriously and you want to be seen as smart, then yes, grammar is relevant.Not in a English class lol spelling and grammar irrelevant.
Its all good.
So many twits that use the word "mark" as if it were bad. And out of proper context too.lol so many wwe marks on this thread.
We get it, you're a hyena.Just laughing
Do you laugh out loud at everything you read? You must be awkward in public.
Because opinions can be wrong.
If you want to make your point come off seriously and you want to be seen as smart, then yes, grammar is relevant.
If you say so.
So many twits that use the word "mark" as if it were bad. And out of proper context too.
We get it, you're a hyena.