I'm thinking that Laurinaitis and Long should have been attached to this feud. They've done nothing to build this as a rivalry and it's probably going to even be the curtain jerker.
I don't get why they picked Sheamus v DBD to have this match. I'm a fan of both guys, and yet I just don't think it ever made for a compelling rivalry. Bryan going in as the heel champion feels anti-climactic, too. I would have much rather seen him go in as the MitB winning, small-fry underdog and win his first title at the big dance and then go heel, if they wanted him too.
This match will probably make up for the lack of a build with in-ring action, but I maintain that the build-up is everything, for main event matches. Just look at any Hogan headlined Mania. The main event stories were always so much better than the actual matches were, and yet the Hogan headlined Manias are consistently among the best. Sure, they weren't all zingers, but the majority of them were.
This match just feels out of place, on this card. I would have rather had Randy Orton v Kane be for the title than this particular match. I also don't get why we couldn't have had a face Randy Orton v a face Sheamus. Face v Face matches work for a one off match, IMO, and they're the two biggest names on Smackdown.
I suppose that's what it all comes down to, for me. WrestleMania is a show based around name value. That's why Rock is back for a match, that's why Jericho is back, and that's why HBK is reffing. Daniel Bryan, more than Sheamus, lacks name brand, right now. I'm not saying that he never will, but at the top of a WrestleMania card, despite popular claims, is not the place to develop name brand; it's the place where you cash in on it. DBD will look worse for this, because I'm certain that he'll lose to Sheamus, and I still don't think Sheamus will pass Randy Orton for top face of Smackdown.