Would you post more in the wrestling sections if the spam rules were relaxed??

[Eternal Dragon]

Quality is different for different people you know.

In that case one sentence can be quality and there should be no spam rules LOL.

Flames Out
DRagon

 

[CCS]

It would turn the forum to shit. I

 

[Slyfox696]

How relaxed do you propose? For example would something like "Cena will win the match because JBL is never going to be champion again because he can't draw" be spam?

It is miles more in depth than "JBL sucks" or whatever, but it's still not exactly constructive to discussion.

He can't draw? He held the title for a year. He was the one that put Cena over into the main-event. He's one of the best heel workers today and in absolute God on the mic.

While he may not win at the Rumble, that doesn't mean his days as a champion are necessarily over.


Using your example sentence, I showed how it COULD be constructive to discussion.

 

[Murfish]

I don't know, but I might. That's more than enough for me.

 

[Tastycles]

He can't draw? He held the title for a year. He was the one that put Cena over into the main-event. He's one of the best heel workers today and in absolute God on the mic.

While he may not win at the Rumble, that doesn't mean his days as a champion are necessarily over.


Using your example sentence, I showed how it COULD be constructive to discussion.

I stand corrected. Ok, so is that the sort of thing you want to allow and also, would that even be banned now?

 

[Mr. TM]

the last two posts can be done without. this isnt for a himmin and a hawin, we have enough of that in the board room. Yes, or no.

It isn't a yes or no situation. It is a question to be pondered.

 

[CCS]

John Cena's gunna lose lol

^^^I swear, that's what my posts will look like if there's no spam rule.

 

[Mighty NorCal]

how is it not a yes or no question?? "would you or not" thats pretty fucking direct in my opinion

 

[Slyfox696]

I stand corrected. Ok, so is that the sort of thing you want to allow and also, would that even be banned now?

The first comment, the one I replied to, should be allowed. The second one "JBL sucks", would not be allowed.

John Cena's gunna lose lol

^^^I swear, that's what my posts will look like if there's no spam rule.

Spam. You didn't say why you thought he would lose.

 

[Tastycles]

John Cena's gunna lose lol

^^^I swear, that's what my posts will look like if there's no spam rule.

You realise he's said about a million times that the rules would be relaxed not removed. The rest of us got over this on page 1.

 

[Eternal Dragon]

Just because there's a relaxed spam rule doesn't mean you need to post like a douche. XD

Flames Out
Dragon

 

[Mr. TM]

Quality has NOTHING to do with length of post. Quality has to do with the foundational basis of the post.

Oh I know a great post can be short and sweet, but it just needs to be backed up.



Spam:
John Cena Sucks

Non Spam WrestleZone Style:
John Cena is a poor entertainer because: Reason 1, Reason 2, Reason 3.

Relaxed Spam:
John Cena is a poor wrestler because of Reason 1.

Is this what we are talking about?

 

[Slyfox696]

Oh I know a great post can be short and sweet, but it just needs to be backed up.



Spam:
John Cena Sucks

Non Spam WrestleZone Style:
John Cena is a poor entertainer because: Reason 1, Reason 2, Reason 3.

Relaxed Spam:
John Cena is a poor wrestler because of Reason 1.

Is this what we are talking about?

Sure. And, if you wanted to talk about Reason 2 and 3, you still could, but if you didn't feel the need to, you wouldn't have to.

Great use of example by the way. Banning coming shortly.

 

[Mr. TM]

Sure. And, if you wanted to talk about Reason 2 and 3, you still could, but if you didn't feel the need to, you wouldn't have to.

Great use of example by the way. Banning coming shortly.

At least I didn't say Czena Sux?

All in all, I like Cena...and got red repped by Wes because of it. Good times, one of my first memories.

 

[CCS]

Spam. You didn't say why you thought he would lose.

It's not spam if there's no spam rule.

 

[Cena's Little Helper]

What's your incentive now? The enjoyment of posting?

Yeah, it'd be the same thing.

Sorry, I am not vain enough to want to post just for the sake of seeing my posts. I post for the sake of posting thoughts that I would like to discuss and to see how I can improve on them.

See, your comment is EXACTLY the problem. People don't understand the difference between relaxing spam, and allowing spam.

Relaxation is a slippery slope. Anyway, I thought one of the things WZ prided itself on, much to the chagrin of those who have been banned from here and go and bash this forum on others, is that it requires posts to be well thought out. Furthermore, the rules already in place are lenient enough. Relatively stringent posting guidelines are not the cause of low poster turnout in the wrestling sections.

 

[Murfish]

Scratch that, I would post more.

 

[CCS]

Does anyone actually have a problem with the current system?

 

[Cena's Little Helper]

Does anyone actually have a problem with the current system?

No, not at all.

 

[justinsayne]

John Cena's gunna lose lol

^^^I swear, that's what my posts will look like if there's no spam rule.

Dude are you not reading?!, they fucking said RELAX the spam rules, spam would still fucking exist, they ARE NOT talking about doing away with the spam rules!!!!!

How the fuck is this so damn hard for you people to comprehend

 

[Marquis]

I would post more in the wrestling sections if the spam rules were toned down. I only post in threads that i know i can write more then 4 sentences in, which isn't many threads. Sometimes i just have a short opinion on the thread subject, but don't write it since i am worried it might be considered spam.

 

[48.7 is Approximately 49 Times Better Than You]

I would.

I still like to take the time to post good, long, quality posts, but I don't ever have much time to do that often. I would definently post more with a relaxed rule.

I think this question should be directed to people that don't post often, like Murfish, Justin, ED, and I. The only people that I've seen say no, besides ED, are those that already post a lot.

 

[CCS]

Dude are you not reading?!, they fucking said RELAX the spam rules, spam would still fucking exist, they ARE NOT talking about doing away with the spam rules!!!!!

How the fuck is this so damn hard for you people to comprehend

Listen closely and you'll hear the faint sound of me not giving a fuck!

If rules just get "relaxed" the forum quality is gonna go way down.

 

[Papa Shango]

It's not spam if there's no spam rule.

Are you honestly THAT fucking dense?! How many times does it have to said? Or maybe you just haven't seen it yet. If so, let me help you out.

WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT GETTING RID OF THE SPAM RULE. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT RELAXING IT. YOU FUCK HEAD!

Okay, noone's actually said that last part yet. But it needed to be.

 

[48.7 is Approximately 49 Times Better Than You]