Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
And I'm sure the WWE should have pushed Matt Hardy over Chris Jericho too, seeing as Jericho was a WCW reject.
As one of the users noted above, the sell was Jeff Hardy. Hardy didn't come to TNA and drag Moore with him, Moore came back to TNA, and Hardy jumped with him. I'll take a guy like Shannon Moore on the roster for the most over wrestler in the world any day.
If Stone Cold Steve Austin circa 1999's best friend was Eugene, you wouldn't hire Eugene to get Austin?
This home grown shit is getting ridiculous. No one was "grown" by TNA. They all wrestled elsewhere prior to getting their break in TNA, including AJ Styles, Samoa Joe and Christopher Daniels.
Come on now, IDR, you're an excellent poster with well thought out opinions and points of view, whether I share them or not. Surely to God you are not comparing Shannon Moore to Chris Jericho? Chris Jericho was a superstar waiting to emerge, a bonafide star who needed to be on a bigger stage to truly blossom into the superstar he's become. He wasn't a WCW reject, he left WCW to go to the WWE because he saw the writing on the wall with WCW and wanted to showcase his talent on the grandest stage of them all. He wasn't released by WCW, he chose to leave, and in doing so made a step up in his career. Moore was fired by WWE and went to TNA by default, a career step backwards, even you as a big TNA fan must admit this. And again please don't speak of Jericho and Moore like they're the same, they're astronomically different.
And sure, to use your analogy, I'd probably hire Eugene to get SCSA, but I don't think I'd fast track him into a title shot over already established and more deserving superstars, I'm quite sure I wouldn't. I'd hire him and keep him in the mid-card and give him the opportunity to move up like everyone else, not put him into a title hunt right away.
Plus, I'm not sure I fully buy into the idea that they were hiring Moore anyway, and got Hardy as a bonus. It's more like Hardy was looking for a change, and Moore got piggy-backed into the deal.
Come on now, IDR, you're an excellent poster with well thought out opinions and points of view, whether I share them or not. Surely to God you are not comparing Shannon Moore to Chris Jericho? Chris Jericho was a superstar waiting to emerge, a bonafide star who needed to be on a bigger stage to truly blossom into the superstar he's become. He wasn't a WCW reject, he left WCW to go to the WWE because he saw the writing on the wall with WCW and wanted to showcase his talent on the grandest stage of them all. He wasn't released by WCW, he chose to leave, and in doing so made a step up in his career. Moore was fired by WWE and went to TNA by default, a career step backwards, even you as a big TNA fan must admit this. And again please don't speak of Jericho and Moore like they're the same, they're astronomically different.
And sure, to use your analogy, I'd probably hire Eugene to get SCSA, but I don't think I'd fast track him into a title shot over already established and more deserving superstars, I'm quite sure I wouldn't. I'd hire him and keep him in the mid-card and give him the opportunity to move up like everyone else, not put him into a title hunt right away.
Plus, I'm not sure I fully buy into the idea that they were hiring Moore anyway, and got Hardy as a bonus. It's more like Hardy was looking for a change, and Moore got piggy-backed into the deal.
No, not directly, but you understand my point. Jericho was a drastic example, but the idea was that it's not always as easy to tell off the bat whether a guy has that it factor who was let go. Austin was fired from WCW and hired by the WWE who turned him into one of the most famous wrestlers of all-time he didn't leave WCW, he was fired, and the WWE didn't give him the Stone Cold gimmick for well over a year into his "Ringmaster" run. That street runs two ways, man.
The point I was trying to make was that while you may not see the potential in Moore to be a successful X Division star, or an X Division champion, I do, and I think they're doing a good job of booking him into a feud with Doug(las) Williams to develop that. He got a title shot outright, yes, and that may not have really been "deserved", but looking at the competition that TNA had at the time in terms of who else could have been given that boost, there were very few who IMO would have been better suited for a longer-term feud sans perhaps Jay Lethal (who they obviously had plans for otherwise).
For the record, I wouldn't have pushed Moore this far this fast, but I don't have nearly the amount of hatred for him simply because of where he was employed before like so many others here do. As you noted with Eugene, I'd have done the same with Moore in giving him a shot in an Ultimate X-type match to win a number one contenders spot, the same way they did with Elijah Burke when he came in as The Pope and feuded with Suicide.
Why is he boring? I continue to read the same slights against him, but no one (but KB) has actually elaborated on it. No one says "he's boring because X, Y, Z". All I hear is "he's boring".
I hear what you are saying, I really do, but it's just that I cannot understand how you can say that it's hard to tell who has the "it" factor and who doesn't with respect to Shannon Moore. He's bounced back and forth, around and around, if he had anything remotely like such "it" factor, someone, somewhere would have to have discovered it by now. It's more likely that both organizations realize he doesn't have "it," that's why he's constantly being future endeavoured.
Don't drag comparisons to SCSA into this discussion please. You admitted that comparisons to Jericho were "drastic," comparisons to Austin's scenario would be even more drastic. And as I said regarding Jericho, when Austin moved from WCW to WWE, that was a step upwards, not a step backwards as with Moore. Sure he was fired by WCW, but that's not really relevant here. SCSA is one of a kind, safe to say that Shannon Moore is not the second coming of SCSA.
I'm not so much questioning his likelihood of being a star (although I really don't believe he has such potential), I was just answering your question as to why there's so much hate directed at him. He has taken other guys spots, most notably Samoa Joe. TNA has Joe and they don't know what to do with him. Here's a thought- put him back into the X-division where he excelled before. Because he's sure as hell not moving into the main event picture in TNA under the Hogan regime, he's going to get lost in the shuffle there of WWE rejects and Hogan's/Bischoff's anointed few. Rather than having Joe be "kidnapped," while they try to figure out what to do with him, make him X-Division champ again. Restore some credibility to the X-Division, rather than fast tracking Shannon Moore there because they want to keep Hardy happy.
Well it certainly beats his 3 Count gimmick. Or do you find that one more serious? He's putting Doug over as a heel and is helping the X Division big time. The hell I care if he's carrying some book with lipstick. He's doing his job. The fan reaction is there. It really shouldn't matter if its big or not because the objective is to give Doug a feud. So far, Shannon has done more as mere challenger than Homicide, Amazing Red and Samoa Joe did for the X Division as champs. I say roll with it while it works.Shannon Moore's gimmick is annoying to me. The punk thing with makeup and mo-hawk is something I'm not fond of for some reason. I also think it's stupid how he tries to put makeup on his opponents. Also he's getting pushed too soon over all of the guys who were there first. I didn't like how he got a title shot at Destination X on the first night he was in TNA. I really think he should ditch the punk gimmick and find something else then maybe I could take him serious.
Yeah. Almost as amazing as your ignorance. I may puke right now for quoting this. How many years were Triple H and Steve Austin wrestling before they were relevant? What? Like 5 years? How long were Kane, Undertaker and Sting wrestling before they became the famous names they are today? Like ten or so. Point is they had years of showing what they had and never did. Until they found the proper platform that is. How times change, right? it doesn't matter what they've done. It's what they do now that counts. I suppose next you're gonna argue about the Official Shelton Benjamin thread. You were pretty stupid to post such a ridiculous comment without reading the details.I dont like Shannon Moore. He's had plenty of time to show me something- but he just never has. So I cant get into the guy.
When I saw this thread was up to its 4th page already- I almost puked. I read the 1st page & not too many people seem to like the guy. But 4 damn pages in like 6 hours is pretty rediculous! I dont know if pages 2, 3 & 4 all rip on Moore too- but either way: its pretty amazing that a Shannon Moore thread has totally blown up like this!!
He sucks. I mean he sucks BAD.
Show me one time he's ever won a damn thing or had a kick ass match. I'll save you the time: they don't exist. Moore has a job because he's friends with the far more talented Hardy Boys. His gimmick isn't even a gimmick, he's never been intimidating, he's never had more than a decent match without another great worker, he takes up space, and he's not interesting. The guy is just a total waste of time and he's always around. He was a jobber forever in WWE and all of a sudden we're supposed to take him seriously? The DILLIGAF thing is idiotic to say the least as it's not even a gimmick. The whole Prince of Punk thing is stupid as no one gets the point to it. He looks like an idiot, isn't that good and has a job because of his friends.
I could go on but you get the idea.
Yeah. Almost as amazing as your ignorance. I may puke right now for quoting this. How many years were Triple H and Steve Austin wrestling before they were relevant? What? Like 5 years? How long were Kane, Undertaker and Sting wrestling before they became the famous names they are today? Like ten or so. Point is they had years of showing what they had and never did. Until they found the proper platform that is. How times change, right? it doesn't matter what they've done. It's what they do now that counts. I suppose next you're gonna argue about the Official Shelton Benjamin thread. You were pretty stupid to post such a ridiculous comment without reading the details.
News Flash. When The Hardy's were originally wrestling in the WWF, Shannon Moore was over at WCW with Gregory Helms wrestling as a part of Three Count. So actually, Moore and Helms had made it in the business without Matt and Jeff's help, but okay . . .
Anyway, I always had a weird spot for Shannon Moore. After seeing quite a bit of what he was able to do over at WCW and then seeing what WWF/WWE did with him was a bit of a loss on me. The reason you all see Moore as Hardy dependent is because that's what Vince McMahon made you see it that way. I am not saying he would be a huge star without ever knowing the Hardy's, but damn, the guy might have been able to make it on his own. Plus, the "Prince of Punk" gimmick might have worked when Moore originally started it, but again, Vince had to use Moore as fodder to CM Punk to punish Moore for looking at TNA back in the4 day. Yeah, so we won't know really what Moore can do these days until we really see what can be done. Sorry, I don't find what Vince deems to be the standard for wrestling because half the time he's wrong. Good example: Look at Elijah Burke.