on the live Smackdown Punks revolutionary stuff didn't get over. Which I feel is because he shit on the product. Which is like working for a car dealer and saying "yea I wish we sold better cars, not like that piece of shit you just bought" to a customer.
Well, you're entitled to your opinion. I disagree.
Well, Punk not being over on Smackdown could have been a market thing. He wasn't over in Tulsa, OK on Raw and wasn't over in Witchita, Kansas on Smackdown. However, that kind of indicates even more that he's very over with a segment of the audience and not so over with the majority. Although I really think he should stop with the "make this fun again" thing. People bought the ticket, they think it's fun. You can say "I want to change things around here" all you want, just don't shit on the product because then you shit on the fans, even the ones who are smarky. If they truly hated it, they wouldn't have bought a ticket. You make the audience feel dumb for buying a ticket to see a product you promote only for you to shit on it.
I liken it more to the effect Austin 3:16 and the Fingerpoke of Doom had. See, there's an initial reaction to an event, and then there's a secondary reaction to an event. There's actually a term for that, but the word evades me atm.
Austin 3:16 was NOT received well by the majority of the fans. I know that contradicts popular belief, but it's true. There WERE some people showing up with Austin 3:16 signs afterwards, but Austin was a mid-card nobody for the majority of 1996 jobbing to guys like Goldust who was being pushed. It wasn't until Bret Hart came back and started talking about Austin that he started getting over, and then came "Pillman's got a gun" and suddenly it was like a fire broke out among Austin fans and everyone started talking about him, and then posthumously Austin 3:16 picked up steam and became this iconic promo.
Likewise, but conversely, the Fingerpoke of Doom was looked at as a great joke, this elaborate fast one the nWo pulled on everyone, and was initially received fairly well live. But within just a short amount of time people were complaining that it left a bad taste in their mouth and as things kept getting worse and worse in WCW, they looked back and realized, this was really one of those defining moments in what went wrong.
My point here is that CM Punk is one of those guys that takes some time to really absorb, and the initial reaction isn't necessarily indicative of what the crowd really will ultimately think.
There IS a problem with this however, and that is Punk is going to have to cut some promos that DO get instantly over sooner or later or the fans will go away. His "Shoot heard round the world" was pretty good, but even that took some time for fans to really absorb. It's almost like he's not only talking over children's heads, but he's also talking over the heads of the older crowd too. I respect that, because he's just proving that the majority of people that watch wrestling aren't very good thinkers, and I like the irony in that, however it's gonna be his undoing if he doesn't figure out how to get the crowd involved and loving him WHILE he's cutting a promo.
Once he does that he's golden, because in the ring, he's amazing already.