I have read some of the posts that been posted already. I haven't read them all yet! Let's face it it's alot already and all I wanted to do is put in my two cents here. Please don't hate but would like feedback.
This is how the battle looks to me as a wrestling fan. I grew up watching WCW and WWF and I must say I enjoy both no matter even when they had bad matches or bad gimmicks. I've been looking back at some of the old shows and PPV's and really looking how bad those matches really were. Back then they didn't have too many talented guys like they do now so it was hard to judge. I think once WCW got closed down and a lot of the smaller guys went to the Indies it help the to develop little bit more then WCW did. This was during the whole Invasion which could've been way much better no matter what the wrestlers they had to use. They could've gotten more or better but they didn't want to. Vince had the money and power to do whatever he wanted to do. We all knew though that WWE was going to win the war it just to help some of the guys get over or beaten up. Either way Vince screwed the Invasion up and could've gotten way much money if he really thought it over more but that's old news. Now back to the Indy scenes there was a lot developing there was a lot that I was watching for different reasons like Pro Wrestling Guerrilla, Ring of Honor, World Wrestling All-Stars, and Xtreme Pro Wrestling. Then of course TNA finally also develop. Of course it wasn't the best or biggest stars but it was very interesting to watch. As a fan it was something new and I liked it because WWE was typical and nothing exciting as much as it should've been. There were still feuds that haven't been done yet. Of course WWE doesn't give us the fans what we want all the time even though sometimes Vince does say he does but not really. Also matches that was built up to be on PPV's you can already seen it on TV or there will be a rematch to be shown on TV. So, why bother paying more then $30 bucks to watch something that can be seen on PPV. I barely buy any more WWE PPV's because it's just cheaper sometime to buy then order it. With TNA it has been different and yeah they have changed there prices a few times but it's been worth it. I get to see more wrestling then Interviews and entertainment unlike WWE shows. There's not much wrong with that because it is good and funny at times but true fans or believe in wrestling more then Interviews and entertainment/sketches aren't everything.
If I had to pick which promotion I like better then I would have to go with TNA because of the youth and it's better to watch. The only reason I would consider WWE at this point would because of the reunite of the Hardy Boyz and of course I'm going to say it D-X. That's not much for me to pick WWE over TNA. They do have more talents on there roster without including OVW/DSW talents. This is how I see it I may miss a few people on both sides but it's sort of accurate I think! WWE has a total of 114 talents and TNA has a total of 54 talents right now. As you can see WWE has 60 talents more then TNA but if you really think about those 60 people probably not even that good or just jobbers in most of ours eyes as wrestling fans. If we break it down between Wrestlers, Divas, and Teams this is what I came up with. Starting with WWE and then it will be TNA side. Here we go WWE: 93 Wrestlers, 21 Divas, and 15 Tag Teams & TNA: 49 Wrestlers, 5 Knockouts, and 7 Tag Teams. What I am about to do is break it down and picking the guys are the heart of WWE and see how many names I get. Then I am going to put them against TNA talents. Like I mention before I may have miss a few people or teams are no longer together. Here we go and I will also discuss my theory on which side my come out on top. Don't get mad if I leave some people out or don't match them up right. On another side note I have been a fan for the past 14 years of my life. Don't believe just ask my family!
WWE (40) vs TNA (40)
Raw Side (13), Smackdown! Side (16), and ECW Side (11) vs TNA (40)
Batista vs Kurt Angle
Bobby Lashley vs Rhino
Booker T vs Jeff Jarrett
Brian Kendrick vs Jay Lethal
Carlito Cool vs Chase Stevens
Charlie Haas vs Eric Young
Chavo Guerrero vs Jerry Lynn
Chris Benoit vs Samoa Joe
CM Punk vs Chris Harris
Edge vs Christian Cage
Eugene vs Robert Roode
Gregory Helms vs Senshi
Hardcore Holly vs James Storm
Jamie Noble vs David Young
Jeff Hardy vs Homicide
Jimmy Wang-Yang vs Elix Skipper
John Cena vs Ron Killings
John Layfield vs Raven
Johnny Nitro vs Shark Boy
Kane vs Abyss
Ken Kennedy vs Sonjay Dutt
Matt Hardy vs Maverick Matt
Paul London vs Petey Williams
Randy Orton vs Kevin Nash or Scott Steiner
Rey Mysterio vs Christopher Daniels
Ric Flair vs Austin Starr
Rob Van Dam vs AJ Styles
Sabu vs Alex Shelley
Shannon Moore vs Frankie Kazarian
Shawn Michaels vs Kip James
Shelton Benjamin vs Chris Sabin
Stevie Richards vs Cassidy Riley
Super Crazy vs Johnny Devine
Test vs Lance Hoyt
The Big Show vs Brother Ray
The Sandman vs Brother Devon
The Undertaker vs Sting
Tommy Dreamer vs Brother Runt
Triple H vs B.G. James
William Regal vs Andy Douglas
Now this may not be the best way to put TNA against WWE in singles competition. I may have chose the wrong people for stupid reasons. I didn't think it would be this hard to pick 40 guys vs 40 guys. Maybe some of you guys can do better or at least tell me would you would different. I'll be looking forward to you guys opinion on this.
WWE Divas (11) vs TNA Knockouts (5)
Ashley Massaro vs Christy Hemme
Beth Phoenix vs Gail Kim
Candice Michelle vs Miss Brooks
Jazz vs Gail Kim
Lilian Garcia vs So Cal Val
Melina Perez vs Jackie Gayda
Michelle McCool vs Jackie Gayda
Mickie James vs Gail Kim
Torrie Wilson vs Christy Hemme
Trinity vs Gail Kim
Victoria vs Gail Kim
WWE do have more Divas then TNA Knockouts. WWE would win this battle because they have more wrestlers but if it was on looks and bikini type contest. It will come very close for both sides. I will say WWE would still win because most of the Divas have been on WWE more then TNA uses there Knockouts. It would be interesting if TNA just had a really true wrestler besides Gail then TNA might win but Gail would have to do most of the fighting. She shouldn't be able to last to long if it was Stable type match but in singles who knows.
WWE Tag Teams (11) vs TNA Tag Teams (7/11)
Brothers of Destruction vs Team 3-D
Cryme Tyme vs Hoyt & Killings
Degeneration-X vs Voodoo Kin Mafia
Hardy Boyz vs Daniels & Styles
Paul London & Brian Kendrick vs Sabin & Lethal
Team Rated RKO vs America's Most Wanted
Test & Mike Knox vs Latin American eXchange
The FBI vs Kazarian & Bentley
The Basham Brothers vs The Naturals
Tommy Dreamer & The Sandman vs Raven & Rhino
William Regal & Dave Taylor vs Alex Shelley & Austin Starr
Without saying much about the tag teams. Just by looking at all of them and even the ones that were together thoughout 2006 and now. TNA has the better tag team division now going against WWE would be interesting to see. The reason I go with TNA hands down is that most of the teams have youth and are really great together. Now for the sake of WWE bringing back some old teams which is what TNA has got as well. TNA still will come out on top for many different reasons. I just really like TNA but only teams WWE really got that would draw me back is Brothers of Destruction, Degeneration-X, Hardy Boyz, and Paul London & Brian Kendrick. That's not enough for me unlike TNA they got it all if they wanted to.
WWE Stables (1) vs TNA Stables (1)
Spirit Squad (Mitch, Kenny, Mikey, Johnny, and Nicky) vs Team TNA (Chris Sabin, Sonjay Dutt, Jay Lethal, Alex Shelley, and Elix Skipper)
Spirit Squad isn't worthy TNA's best now the guys that I did pick are great but come on Styles, Daniels, Jarrett, Lynn, and etc would kill them. I guess we should spice it up even more by putting in Petey Williams or Eric Young or Brother Runt or Cassidy Riley or David Young. Either way I can see TNA totally dominate this match.
If would really break it down with the Single, Tag Team, and Stable and everyone only gets to wrestle once. TNA could pull out the victory because of there wrestling ability. With teams that can work well with each others and of course managers could come into place. I'll go for TNA but then again WWE do have the most experience on there side especially if Chris Jericho, Steve Austin, and even The Rock came back. Now if we were going by entertainment and interviews instead of matches wise then WWE can win. I'm not saying TNA doesn't have any one good to work the mic but people just consider it to WWE without any questions about it. If this could really happen and all gloves were off. Meaning retired wrestlers came out of the wood works, indy wrestlers, and foreign stars were legal and the thing is money can't be in place for them to pick which side to go to. Any former TNA stars that were in WWE can go to TNA side the same way for WWE. Of course if that would be the case then half of TNA roster is almost WWE former stars.
If I really truly honestly pick a side just by these names or if they can bring in people all over the world. I would say TNA would still win the battle. Some of the guys don't like WWE and some of the foreign as already been in TNA and really enjoy it. WWE already don't like or even give some of the guys another chance if they wanted to. Speaking of a few foreign names like maybe Taka M, Mr. Aguila, Juvi, and Psicosis to list a few names. There are a lot more of course! It would be interesting if ROH, Mexico, and Japan really did come into place especially if they were on the TNA side. If that did happen WWE would get beaten because of sooo many young experience wrestlers.
That's all I'm going to say please let me know what you guys think of this and don't be to harsh though. Later everyone!
G