Technically Umaga has not been defeated. Eddie Fatu has been defeated under the character of Jamal. He as a person has physically been defeated but the character of Umaga has not. Unless WWE acknowledges that they are the same person playing the role, it's considered a different entity. Unless they acknowledge "tests" at house shows, the same thing applies.
Therefore making him undefeated. What happens at house shows only are acknowledged if WWE acknowledges chooses to do so. It's stupid, but that's how it works. Some title changes at house shows have been mentioned on television, but unless they are, they don't count either. That's why big ppv feuds that are supposedly first encounters often have already happened at multiople house shows as the two wrestlers learn to work together, use certain spots, etc.
It's like with the Orton situation. If he attacks some wrestlers he supposedly can add them to his list of "killed" legends. Other times he has to actually defeat them to make the claim and attacking them doesn't qualify. If he can attack one person and kill them then why didn't he "kill" Hogan when he attacked him prior to the match? The answer is that things only count when we're told that they count. It's how things get marketed for "entertainment purposes." We can see through it but that's still how it works.
If "ages ago" is in reference to your post from a few hours before that one, as opposed to another post, then it's safe to say that you exaggerate even more than WWE does
Anyway, he will eventually be actually considered defeated. At that point he'll probably lose to things that he was previously invincible to, just as we saw with much bigger names.
