TNA No Surrender LD | Page 14 | WrestleZone Forums

TNA No Surrender LD

Yes in professional wrestling. That's why you can only win a title by pinning or submitting the champion. Otherwise you didn't win, you lost or cheated. in both cases you don't deserve the belt.



I guess TNA like their derection to plod along roads with Dusty finishers



No contest = no clean finish. No clean finish = no clear winner. No winner = 2 losers.

NO CONTEST MEANS THE MATCH IS THROWN OUT, NOTHING HAPPENED. Its been this way FOREVER. How long have you been watching wrestling and you dont understand this?
 
Yes in professional wrestling. That's why you can only win a title by pinning or submitting the champion. Otherwise you didn't win, you lost or cheated. in both cases you don't deserve the belt.



I guess TNA like their derection to plod along roads with Dusty finishers



No contest = no clean finish. No clean finish = no clear winner. No winner = 2 losers.

Why The Fuck Are You Still Talking About Ties?
 
Wasn't :disappointed: at you dude. I was :disappointed: at the fact TNA doesn't have the balls to air against the NFL.
ok, in that case, I agree with you.
BAHAHAHA PAPER AIRPLANE
That shit was great.

Is Anderson a heel or face? I have no idea after this match. And he should be talking about how he should be a champ, because of the no winner of the other semifinal.

Why aren't they hyping the crap internet studio show?
 
Review won't be up until tomorrow. I have to find the opener and a few parts of the show that I fell asleep during.
 
Solid show. I enjoyed it. Some rough edges, and the booking in Angle/Hardy was a facepalm, but Hardy/Angle/Anderson could be a hell of a match.
 
NO CONETST MEANS THE MATCH IS THROWN OUT, NOTHING HAPPENED. Its been this way FOREVER. How long have you been watching wrestling and you dont understand this?

If the match is thrown out, there is no winner. If nobody wins, they both lose. Find a hole in my logic and prove me wrong

Why The Fuck Are You Still Talking About Ties?

because people keep responding
 
Is Anderson a heel or face? I have no idea after this match. And he should be talking about how he should be a champ, because of the no winner of the other semifinal.

Why aren't they hyping the crap internet studio show?

Well, you see, there's actually this term in pro wrestling that we call a tweener.

Mr. Anderson would fall into said category.
 
If the match is thrown out, there is no winner. If nobody wins, they both lose. Find a hole in my logic and prove me wrong

No contests are constantly done in wrestling so that neither member can say the lost a match, its so no one loses any kind of credibility. Your logic is false. Not winning does not mean you lost, a draw does not mean you lost. Your logic is inherently flawed.
 
No contests are constantly done in wrestling so that neither member can say the lost a match, its so no one loses any kind of credibility. Your logic is false. Not winning does not mean you lost, a draw does not mean you lost. Your logic is inherently flawed.

my logic is perfect.

If you do not win a match you lose it.

If you tie a match, you do not win

therefore you lose.

the result of a no contest is a tie

therefore nobody wins, therefore everybody loses.
 
Anderson's an Eddie, in a way. He does heel shit and people fucking gush over it.
thanks. I can tell he's not a tweener because he doesn't act down the middle. He acts all heel-like, but the fans treat him like a face.

So is he booked as a face, as in teaming with faces against heels in tag matches, etc? Or is he booked as a heel but the stupid iMPACT Zone fans cheer him anyway? I don't watch iMPACT, since I'm not home for it (and can only deal with so much aggravation and guys who got over in a Bingo Hall 15 years ago).
 
my logic is perfect.

If you do not win a match you lose it.

If you tie a match, you do not win

therefore you lose.

the result of a no contest is a tie

therefore nobody wins, therefore everybody loses.

Oh My God... A TIE IS A FUCKING TIE...
Not A Win Or Loss. But A FUCKING TIE..
Look at The Eagles Bengals game a few years ago.
 
my logic is perfect.


If you do not win a match you lose it.

If you tie a match, you do not win

therefore you lose.

the result of a no contest is a tie

therefore nobody wins, therefore everybody loses.

You know what, no matter what you say you are wrong, not winning does not = losing. And even if you were correct, who gives a shit? In professional wrestling IT DOES NOT COUNT AS A LOSS. Kurt isnt going anywhere, and thats the actual END OF STORY.
 
I'll often times throw on a wrestling DVD if I can't sleep at night, I don't know why but for some reason it almost always helps me get to sleep (I think it might have something to do with crowd noise)

This is true, Ive often noticed that when Im watching TV I will grow tired more rapidly in comparison to when I am trying to sleep. Perhaps its the crowd noise or perhaps its because you are not thinking as much, because my mind seems to refuse to shut off when Im trying to sleep at night.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top