Explain to me how it is not in this case in this situation, without using the false lacking time defense. If you all would have waited for a vote and allowed the voiceless a part in the decision making, you could have had your party exist in the same capacity as it does now, without losing your ideals.
The lacking time point is not false. The ability to add members to your party closes tonight. Perhaps Ba-Bomb could have waited a little longer but to be honest I don't see a huge burst of posters joining up by tonight and therefore we would not be in the top three parties with the most members and not be put foward. If he waited and held a vote there would no doubt come a point in which some but not all party members voted. So do we then discount everybodies votes who did vote because unless everybody has voted it's not the peoples views just some of our views. I mean where is the cut off point? Sometimes as a leader (and not in any hiarchy, more important sense) but as the person who created the party there comes a point where you may have to make a snap decision based on what you feel is right for your people and what ultimately allows us to continue existing in a form that for the time being is best suited.
Anyway I am ok with the choice...be interested in hearing what other Party members feel about it though.