The Official LOLWWE Thread | Page 5 | WrestleZone Forums

The Official LOLWWE Thread

Flavor of the month... Who has been there for what, 6 months now?

The payoff looks to be coming at Mania.

It's just odd to me. I haven't watched TNA in months and as a result, I don't have any opinions on it. Makes me think you still watch WWE, despite what you say.
 
I like Laurinitis. It took him a while, but he's built up a good character on RAW. There's something about him that makes him a likable heel. Same with David Otunga as well.
 
Flavor of the month... Who has been there for what, 6 months now?

I don't literally mean a month. I am referring to the long running stream of entities that play a top heel for a little while and then nothing comes from it as they just move on to the next stopgap.

The payoff looks to be coming at Mania.

People are definitely going to be buying that show to see him showdown with Teddy Long. I'll be on the edge of my seat for that power struggle.

It's just odd to me. I haven't watched TNA in months and as a result, I don't have any opinions on it. Makes me think you still watch WWE, despite what you say.

I had some interest in the product when Punk was blowing up. Then they killed my interest in him because they didn't have anyone for him to face. I streamed part of the rumble and saw this boring dude is still flubbing up the show. I read some of the results from Elimination Chamber due to the pseudo hype and a misguided belief that they planned to have something interesting leading into mania beyond Rock-Cena. People are whining like little girls over the Rock's spot on the card while this guy is likely the focal point of one of the matches? Sometimes I just don't get WWE marks.

I certainly don't get the point of purposefully dicking the fans around by suggesting something of interest is going to happen and then being like lol heat suckahs.
 
Why can't I talk about why I don't watch it?

Because when you form opinions about a show you don't actually watch, chances are the things you're complaining about aren't actually valid criticisms (like calling Ace a short term, interchangable heel when he's been in the same role for 6 months and made the focal point of multiple angles) because they're based on flawed or missing data.

I like Laurinitis. It took him a while, but he's built up a good character on RAW. There's something about him that makes him a likable heel. Same with David Otunga as well.

Well that's a logical contradiction.

Rather watch The Miz wrestle than see Ace talk.

Then Ace is doing his job better than Miz.

And for a LOLWWE thing to contribute to the thread seems like there's not going to be a payoff for Zack Ryder any time soon. Making the whole "no more title" and "Kane gon' kill you, mo'fuka!" shit utterly pointless. The booking of the FCW title of late counts too.
 
Why not? There have been reports of him fighting at Survivor Series and Heyman could have been the connecting factor.

The WrestleMania build is clearly more important than having him appear in a match at Survivor Series, with no real reason behind it (other than, "OH MAH GAWD, THE HEYMAN GUIZE MUST BE TOGETHER!").
 
The WrestleMania build is clearly more important than having him appear in a match at Survivor Series, with no real reason behind it (other than, "OH MAH GAWD, THE HEYMAN GUIZE MUST BE TOGETHER!").

I just think it would be cool? It would make some sense, and would provide for an interesting build. Then, Punk and Lesnar could work against each other in the future. If WWE wants to use Lesnar for the WM build, they can and will. Its not like they can't afford more dates.

I made a thread about Eddie Guerrero bleeding like a geyser. Fuck this shit.

Saw it. Youtube the match. Didn't find it. Got upset.
 
So WWE has a storyline that parallels the Claire Lynch story.


....Why? They couldn't knock off a story from TNA that was.... I don't know.... Good?
 
I just think it would be cool? It would make some sense, and would provide for an interesting build. Then, Punk and Lesnar could work against each other in the future. If WWE wants to use Lesnar for the WM build, they can and will. Its not like they can't afford more dates.

No, it wouldn't. The fact that they are both associated with Heyman doesn't mean it makes sense. Plus, Punk has talked both on and off screen about how he isn't a fan of the part time guys walking in and taking main event slots, so why would he even want Lesnar on the team?

This is one of the things that drives me nuts about the IWC. They talk about how WWE's booking is stupid and makes no sense, then they get pissed because WWE didn't use some crazy, illogical booking idea.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top