Thu, June 9th, 2011 at 5:26am PDT|
Updated: June 9th, 2011 at 5:55am
Marvel released this teaser for "X-Men: Schism" yesterday
Marvel Comics announced this morning that "
UncannyX-Men" #544 publication in October will mark the end of the long-running series, due in large part to the events unfolding in "X-Men: Schism."
"Uncanny" editor Nick Lowe told
the Associated Press, "The
X-Men are getting torn apart from within. The events of 'Schism' do more damage to the X-Men than any villain has ever done." The sentiment was echoed by current series writer Kieron Gillen who called the end of the series a necessity, though "it's not taken lightly."
Jason Aaron, writer of "X-Men: Schism," explained that while his miniseries may detail exactly why the team breaks up and "Uncanny" ends, the actual team dissolution has been a long time in coming. "It's obvious that things are coming to a head between [Cyclops and Wolverine]...Whether you're a long time X-Men fan or a new X-Men fan, you can pick out and understand the nature of this conflict and how it breaks apart the two lynchpin guys of the X-Men."
As regular readers of Marvel know, the chances of "Uncanny" remaining off the shelves for too long are virtually none, however the story does not directly mention the launch of a new "Uncanny X-Men" #1 as of yet. Recently in his
TALK TO THE HAT column on CBR, Marvel SVP of Publishing Tom Brevoort explained "In terms of the real progenitor titles, yes. 'Uncanny' is the only book with an unbroken run...I would not assume that it's safe. Maybe that makes it a little less likely because it's the one title we've got that maintains continuity all the way back to the '60s. But again, in terms of publishing today in 2011, 2012, 2013 -- the need of right now is probably going to outweigh the need of 'it's nice that we have this thing that goes back to the '60s.' If there's a benefit to there being an 'Uncanny X-Men' #1 because we're building something in a substantial way and we want to give people that entry point, maybe we'd hesitate a fraction of a second longer, but I think it'd be only a fraction."