Saunter with Coco and GD w/ special guest MRC

[DirtyJosé]

I'd commit perjury for that. And to help get Sam out of legal problems.

 

[ScreaminNormanSmiley]

I would be willing to settle for the two. Settle.

 

[Барбоса]

I would suggest that you write your next answer as Hunter Kravinoff or Hollis Hickok

 

[Ty Burna]

This should be interesting.

 

[¡Roján!]

Fuck, I just missed out. Have a heart, and mention me, would ya?

 

[Pay Per Ghost]

You really can't put in 7, I dare ya!

 

[Coco]

I would suggest that you write your next answer as Hunter Kravinoff or Hollis Hickok

I'm going to need a quick summary of what Kravinoff's been up to since I left and told people to use the character however they wanted to. Links would be helpful.

 

[Mantaur Rodeo Clown]

I'm going to need a quick summary of what Kravinoff's WWE been up to since I left and told people to use the company however they wanted to. Links would be helpful.

 

[Барбоса]

I'm going to need a quick summary of what Kravinoff's been up to since I left and told people to use the character however they wanted to. Links would be helpful.

Apart from the court case against Big Dave, I think his only other appearance was in a meeting with Toyota where it was revealed that he had no intention of ever returning to WZCW after becoming a successful drug dealer

 

[Coco]

Drug dealer? I think I'll be shying away from Kravinoff. Wouldn't want to give the voter the wrong idea. Don't want to look like the reason for PsychoBlack's character's not taking off.

 

[Барбоса]

Kravinoff did try to help out someone with a whole host of mental difficulties. That should count for something

 

[Coco]

Sure, but did he ever make anyone a better poster with unsolicited kindness?

 

[Барбоса]

There was that university professor he educated about the true meaning of Freudian philosophy. I am sure he has since become a better poster in philosophical journals?

 

[Coco]

Yeah, but Dagger's lot aren't going to be swayed with talk of the spam sections or philosophical journals. They want to hear about important posting.

 

[Барбоса]

It seems to have gotten lost in the mix of the anti-Dagger mod thread so I will repost it here

There really has been an interesting thread to read. People defending/attacking someone not here; arguments over the worst kind of minutiae - basically, everything bar the actual matters at hand and ignoring of the actual points brought up by the OP and others when it suits. And on top of that, telling others that their own personal thoughts even if they are influenced by events rather than just hearing of stories about the candidates are meaningless, when in fact it is those personal thoughts that will make people vote the way they will vote.

And some people think Slyfox is not a master of trolling...

And before anyone says anything about my leanings, I have long since distanced myself from the whole election process. Was I contacted about giving my support? Yes, but I immediately told that person that I would not be voting for him or anyone else and I will be keeping to that.

Anyhoo, since it was brought up here, I find the whole spam vs non spam poster to be strange, almost counter-intuitive.

Collect together a list of all the best posters on this forum and you will find that the vast majority of them spend the vast majority of their time posting spam. Off the top of my head, I can only think of the likes of Jack-Hammer and Rayne who post more non-spam than spam.

Whereas it is quite often the "try hards" and "poorer" posters who feel the need to either spam up the non-spam sections or fill it full of posts that copy or repeat arguments that have already been made.

Of course, I might just be saying this as I am predominantly a spam poster.

 

[¡Roján!]

Am I being mentioned in your next election post Coco? Afterall, the Chief of Staff needs his recognition.

 

[Coco]

It seems to have gotten lost in the mix of the anti-Dagger mod thread so I will repost it here

I caught it and smiled. Not sure if I repped it though. I should have. Wise men like yourself should be far more involved in this process.

Am I being mentioned in your next election post Coco? Afterall, the Chief of Staff needs his recognition.

You were mentioned in my second debate post. You're needed than Milenko.

 

[Pepe Silvia]

How would you feel about a Bully Ray title reign? Your answer will secure my vote for you in the erection. uh, election.

 

[Coco]

For. I find it vastly preferable to Robert Roode's continued existence. I like to think the couple times he's held the belt for Roode over the last few weeks have been laying seeds for Bully Ray to find himself in a title match. Hopefully he uses the belt as a mirror with which to check out his calves.

 

[Pepe Silvia]

I would not hate him picking up the TV title and making it really mean something. EY kind of killed it with his (albeit entertaining) antics.

 

[Coco]

If EY would have wrestled regularly in addition to his antics, it would have been fine. I really like him. At the very least he's given funnier material to work with than Santino. But yeah, I'd like to see one that belt become relevant. Fine idea. Better him than Garrett Bischoff or someone of that ilk.

 

[Uncle Sam]

I really enjoy Eric Young, and I enjoyed the one segment I saw where he was TV Champion. I think he was TV Champion; he was carrying about four title belts.

 

[Pay Per Ghost]

His antics made me laugh, never cringe.

That always means you're doing well as a comedy act.

Him tagging the wrong people and attacking his partner were gigglesome.

 

[Uncle Sam]

How good is Boardwalk Empire? Worth £35? I was looking at the exchange rate, and that's roughly $30,000.

 

[Pepe Silvia]

So on the off-chance that the election comes down to Crock and Dagger, and you're getting a Ralph Nader share of the votes, should your supporters vote Crock?