Royal Rumble 2013 Live Discussion - Jan. 27, 2013

Just tought of Lesnar costing Rock the match and having Lesnar vs. Rock, Cena vs. Punk (so that Cena can end the reign of Punk, but of course Punk will lose it to Rock tonight).
 
Someone explain the problem with Cena winning? He is on the same level as Hogan/HBK/Austin, all of which have won 2. Now he has won 2. He is the best guy in the company by a mile, and has been for years.

They made the right choice.
 
ITT people who don't get where the money is at Wrestlemania.

Awesome rumble, right call
 
I'm with ya'll. And, in defense of Cena winning, just because it's obvious didn't mean it was bad.

Definitely. If 80% of people predicted Bo Dallas would win, and he ended up winning, that would be just as predictable. Same thing with anyone else. Predictable doesn't always mean good or bad.
 
Someone explain the problem with Cena winning? He is on the same level as Hogan/HBK/Austin, all of which have won 2. Now he has won 2. He is the best guy in the company by a mile, and has been for years.

They made the right choice.

Because it means WWE is leaning towards Rock/Cena II that was reported b the dirt sheets months ago. It's not Cena winning that's the problem, it's that there's a really good chance Punk gets his reign ended either tonight or at EC.

Whether I agree with it or not is different. That just explains the butthurt.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,825
Members
21,726
Latest member
chrisxenforo
Back
Top