Could have sworn that one was obvious.I need Coco to tell me how to vote in the Styles vs. Batista match.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Could have sworn that one was obvious.I need Coco to tell me how to vote in the Styles vs. Batista match.
Oh FFS.It's an unfair comparison because apart from 2002, WWE never saw a prime Rey Mysterio.
It's not appropriate to put it in the actual thread, so I'll just say my piece here.
Misawa died from taking a belly to back suplex... how the hell would he survive the TOMBSTONE PILEDRIVER? The Undertaker literally kills this gook ten times out of ten. Literally.
You don't have to get the appeal, but he's better than Misawa.
It's not appropriate to put it in the actual thread, so I'll just say my piece here.
Misawa died from taking a belly to back suplex... how the hell would he survive the TOMBSTONE PILEDRIVER? The Undertaker literally kills this gook ten times out of ten. Literally.
Jeffue are you serious?
I had no idea Undertaker was the top draw of the WWE. Of course he's bigger than guys like Austin/Rock/Hogan. Don't be stupid. At the end of it all the guy's nothing but a glorified novelty act.
Reread it again and think about how much you know about me.
That post simply illustrates a certain mind-set that a lot of 'Taker voters have but don't have the balls to express and instead come up with reasoning that's just as dumb.
Glorified novelty act is a serious understatement of what the Undertaker is. The reason the WWF never pushed the Undertaker as the guy is because that gimmick is not meant to be sold as the main guy. He was/is a special attraction, in the same way that Andre the Giant was the special attraction before him.
The Undertaker has been in the Upper to Main Event level in the WWF for 22 years. Think how ridiculously long that is in comparison to all of the people that have worked for that company. He may have never been the guy, but he's the only person that has taken titles off of Prime Hogan and Prime Austin.
The ridiculous arguments against Batista have swayed me in his favor. AJ supporters and Punk detractors have that same ******* attitude that drives me away.
Most of the posts in this tourney are painful to read. If you incorporate the wrestler's catchphrases and shit into your post, you're a ******.
I'm genuinely torn on Vader vs Mysterio. Vader's supporters glibly treating Rey like an afterthought is a huge turn-off and I can't see myself voting that way if I don't see more convincing arguments in that thread. Similarly, I want to see some Mysterio fans make a decent case for him because in spite of everything IC's done to make Vader a big deal on this board, this isn't the sort of match Rey's camp needs to lay down and die on.
That thread has been a huge disappointment so far. I need Tasty or NorCal.
The ridiculous arguments against Batista have swayed me in his favor. AJ supporters and Punk detractors have that same ******* attitude that drives me away.
Most of the posts in this tourney are painful to read. If you incorporate the wrestler's catchphrases and shit into your post, you're a ******.
So speed puts someone over Mysterio? I hardly see how. If anything, Vader's speed just means that the same old power vs resourcefulness match happens a bit quicker than it otherwise would. But Vader's speed doesn't change the game.I was trying not to come off like that, but I really can't picture how Rey would beat Vader. Most of the big guys that Rey beats are the slow, lumbering kind. Vader doesn't fit that mold.
So speed puts someone over Mysterio? I hardly see how. If anything, Vader's speed just means that the same old power vs resourcefulness match happens a bit quicker than it otherwise would. But Vader's speed doesn't change the game.
And on the flipside of that coin, one needs to consider that Vader isn't accustomed to men of Rey's size being so successful in the heavyweight ranks. If you think Vader could surprise Rey, it's worth being mindful of the fact that Rey is an equally novel opponent for the Vader.
You see it as clear cut. But I've yet to be convinced of that.
I was trying not to come off like that, but I really can't picture how Rey would beat Vader. Most of the big guys that Rey beats are the slow, lumbering kind. Vader doesn't fit that mold.
All that means is he can take more moves, which actually gives Rey more ways to beat him. See what he did when he was "just a Cruiserweight."
Rey probably drew more money too. Can't say that is my go to criteria but the simpletons love that shit.
Never said Rey is "just a Cruiserweight." Reading is fundamental.
Bam Bam wasn't a big deal at all in WCW, so that doesn't matter much at all. I don't like the drawing money argument either, but I appreciate you using that when Styles vs. Batista is out there right now.
Yet by doing so you are voting for someone that looks like a ****** and is a million times more ******* than AJ![]()
I was leaning towards Batista, and I'm still yet to be swayed. How hard is it to prove one was a bigger attraction than the other?