Sure I can see Austin coming to TNA, it'll be in a triple threat match with Austin, Santa Claus, and the Easter Bunny.
Come on, get serious. Why would Austin go to TNA? What purpose could it possibly serve either side, especially Austin's?
As I understand it, there's no bad blood between Vince McMahon and Austin. If Austin wanted to return to wrestling and was physically able to go, Vince would welcome him back with open arms and blank cheque book. This is what separates the Hogan signing from this ludicrous Austin suggestion. Vince wanted no part of Hogan, certainly not at the type of money that I imagine Hogan wanted. Hogan had no option but go to TNA, or else be out of the wrestling business for good as WWE wasn't an option. But the same cannot be said of SCSA. WWE could offer Austin more money, more exposure, more spinoff potential (such as movies), than TNA ever could, and I'm sure WWE would in a heartbeat if SCSA came calling. Austin is not 56 years old and is still able to walk, so WWE would still have some interest in him.
Incidentally, are we really so certain that Austin cannot still go in the ring to some degree? I'm not suggesting that he can go flat out and full time, but I'm not sure he couldn't come back and wrestle to some limited capacity (if he wanted to, which apparently he does not). I know all about his health history so I don't need anyone to come on here and update me about his troubles. I remember several years ago when HBK was retired and I wondered if he would ever come back, and I was admonished by one of my friends, who had been a wrestling fan far longer than me, that there was no way Michaels would ever be able to wrestle again due to his extensive back problems. Yet he has been back and going pretty much full out, albeit a reduced schedule. He doesn't limit his action in the ring much and really shows no evidence of a dehabilitating back injury that ruled out a wrestling return years ago. Is it possible that the same could be the case with Austin? Because if so, a return to WWE wouldn't necessarily be out of the question, and with even a possibility of a WWE return being there, a TNA appearance is even more impossible.
Dream on TNA fans and get used tothe Terry and Eric show, along with all of his cronies (Macho Man, Nasty Boys, Scott Hall, Brutus the barber Beefcake., etc.,) putting over all of the younger TNA talent, as these guys have always done throughout their careers (he says with a slight hint of sarcasm).
Come on, get serious. Why would Austin go to TNA? What purpose could it possibly serve either side, especially Austin's?
As I understand it, there's no bad blood between Vince McMahon and Austin. If Austin wanted to return to wrestling and was physically able to go, Vince would welcome him back with open arms and blank cheque book. This is what separates the Hogan signing from this ludicrous Austin suggestion. Vince wanted no part of Hogan, certainly not at the type of money that I imagine Hogan wanted. Hogan had no option but go to TNA, or else be out of the wrestling business for good as WWE wasn't an option. But the same cannot be said of SCSA. WWE could offer Austin more money, more exposure, more spinoff potential (such as movies), than TNA ever could, and I'm sure WWE would in a heartbeat if SCSA came calling. Austin is not 56 years old and is still able to walk, so WWE would still have some interest in him.
Incidentally, are we really so certain that Austin cannot still go in the ring to some degree? I'm not suggesting that he can go flat out and full time, but I'm not sure he couldn't come back and wrestle to some limited capacity (if he wanted to, which apparently he does not). I know all about his health history so I don't need anyone to come on here and update me about his troubles. I remember several years ago when HBK was retired and I wondered if he would ever come back, and I was admonished by one of my friends, who had been a wrestling fan far longer than me, that there was no way Michaels would ever be able to wrestle again due to his extensive back problems. Yet he has been back and going pretty much full out, albeit a reduced schedule. He doesn't limit his action in the ring much and really shows no evidence of a dehabilitating back injury that ruled out a wrestling return years ago. Is it possible that the same could be the case with Austin? Because if so, a return to WWE wouldn't necessarily be out of the question, and with even a possibility of a WWE return being there, a TNA appearance is even more impossible.
Dream on TNA fans and get used tothe Terry and Eric show, along with all of his cronies (Macho Man, Nasty Boys, Scott Hall, Brutus the barber Beefcake., etc.,) putting over all of the younger TNA talent, as these guys have always done throughout their careers (he says with a slight hint of sarcasm).