Firstly Ryback, this guy got a fair bit of acclaim from the internet as a member of Nexus, when he was starting to look like the breakout star. Clotheslining the crap out of everybody until he went down with an injury. He comes back (as a face,which might have something to do with it) clubs a few jobbers then all of a sudden he is rubbish and a Goldberg clone.
How is this? Has he messed up in the ring? Has he shown a lack of charisma or in ring skills in his 10 minutes of match time he has had so far? Or is it just young know it all internet wrestling fans who have it in for anyone over who is a 300lb monster not called Brock Lesnar?
I don't remember many people calling/thinking him to be the breakout star of the Nexus. Everyone was saying Barrett would be the breakout star. And if people were jumping about saying he's awesome in 2010 then they are total hypocrites. From what i remember of Skip Sheffield, he didnt do too much. Clothesline here and there and a few moves. He seemed very green to me. So if anyone was saying he was awesome back then, they need to think twice before they next comment on the wrestling skills of John Cena, Khali, Big Show etc etc etc.
Who funnily enough and with even less reason to also got called a Goldberg clone and a crap wrestler around 10 years ago when he arrived. Near everyone bought into Brock. But that was 10 years ago. Nowadays every big wrestler gets shat on by todays internet wrestling geniuses. How come nobody chants Mr Perfect or Billy Gunn at Dolph Ziggler? or Kurt Angle at Jack Swagger? I'll give you a few more -
Kofi - uses some of Rick Steamboats offense
Del Rio - Latin Million $ Man
HHH - tons of Harley Race in his style
I was on quite a few different wrestling discussion boards back then with a decent sized community. And not once did i ever see Lesner labelled a crap wrestler. They made a few comparisons to Goldberg saying he should be the next Goldberg with a long undefeated streak. But i didnt see anyone say he was crap.
And the reason is that while Ziggler may look like Mr Perfect, theres still not enough there to make a solid comparison. Other than bleach blonde hair. But if you're going down the road of HHH and Kofi using peoples offense then we can list 3/4 of the WWE. All wrestlers share some move set with the people that trained them or that influenced them when they were younger and/or training. As for the del rio comparison. Theres nothing to suggest hes anything like Dibiase. MDM was a rich guy who bought people around him and made them his lackies or bought them off so he could win matches. ADR is a rich guy....thats all. Nothing ADR does reminds me of Dibiase.
Ryback looks like Goldberg, and hes a guy whos doing exactly the same thing that Goldberg done. Had very quick squash matches with lower card/unknown talent. Goldberg literally came to the ring, hit 4 or 5 power moves and bam. End of match. Rybacks doing EXACTLY the same thing.
Thank god there was no internet about before the late 90's Ric Flair and Hulk Hogan would never have reached the heights with teenage smarks comparing them to Buddy Rogers and Superstar Billy Graham. I would safely bet if there were assholes about then chanting such things wrestling over recent years would have never gotten as big as it has been over the last 30 years.
As others stated. Wrestlings changed. Its evolved and the fans with it. Back then there were still comparisons believe me. Just not on a worldwide scale. And fans are "smarter" nowadays. Its a possibility that these days Flair may not of even gotten as over as he did back in the 80's. And if he did, he'd be totally different. He wouldn't be able to flop around the ring and oversell thats for sure. Back then it was more about putting on a complete show for the fans. Nowdays more fans like the show aspects, but they need to see decent wrestling aswell.
I love smaller wrestlers like Daniel Bryan, CM Punk, Dean Ambrose and Sin Cara but I also love big steroid monsters capable of feats of brutality and power like Mason Ryan and Ryback. But I'll probs get a ton of shit for liking the latter two as they are 'dull' and 'goldberg/batista clones' Seems big wrestlers just are not 'cool' anymore.
Well thats just it. With the fans evolving, it has allowed them to appriciate actual wrestling rather than just brawls. If people just wanted brawls they could turn on UFC or Boxing. When you look at the big wrestlers of the past 20-30 years. I can only think of 4 that are worthy of remembrance. Undertaker, Kane, Big Show and Andre. Most others have been very very poor in the ring with the exception of a few like A-Train, Test etc etc. Im talking about guys 6'6 and above aswell. Not the likes of Cena or Lesner. And if people are going to dispute Show and Andre being in my 4 "good" big man wrestlers. They are very good for their size. Unlike others around their height.
I feel wrestling needs wrestlers of all sizes and that some of today's fans in WWE are hindering big guys getting over by being overly critical and too quick to compare them to previous monsters.
It does, i agree, and people make comparisons too quickly. Not just with big men. With everything. After this weeks Raw, Cena vs Laryngitis is now being compared to Vince vs Austin....why i dont know
Punks the new Stone Cold apparently. Deam Ambrose can be the new Y2J. Ziggler the new Hennig. It goes on and on and on and on. People need to wait and let them forge their own legacy. 20 years time from now there will be comparisons made on those guys too.
As for my view, i like bigger wrestlers. But only those that interest me. That can work in the ring. Decent on the mic, that look menacing.
Sadly Ryback doesnt fill that criteria for me. He may be ok on the mic but his ring work is poor. No im not just judgeing that on since hes been back. I've watched him in OVW, As Skip Sheffield and now as Ryback. Hes nothing special to me. There is nothing in his arsenal that another man of similar size with better ability could pull off. Theres nothing that makes him "special"
His look is also a worry for me. Yes his physique is immense. But the guy has a face that you expect to hit on a wack-a-mole game. His looks so intimidating but then i look at his head and it seems totally disproportionate to the rest of his body. Added his sticky out ears. He just seems a bit comical to me =\ which is a shame because i actually do want to get behind him.
Aside from his look, his shouting after the match is annoying. He should stay silent. As Goldberg did...sadly. He just needs to be emotionless.
His ring work is boring to me. As i said im not judging him on his WWE work. Thats actually pretty good. But thats only in squash matches. Whats going to happen when he needs to step up and go against some upper carders. Ryback seems to have very little stamina from what ive seen. I cant see him putting on 10+ minute matches. And that would be fine if there wasnt already Show, Khali, Brodus Clay, Otunga, Ryan, Ezekiel Jackson, and Mark Henry. All of whom have the pace of a slug.
Wrestling fans like to see a big guy every now and then. But They apparently turned down the idea of Brodus Clay being a unstoppable big man, then go and bring in Ryback. WWE is packed full of big men like those listed above with very little actual wrestling talent. (Aside from Otunga, he isnt a big man, he just has very little in ring talent) Fans value character first and foremost it seems. At least casual fans. But even then. they value the ability for some wrestling ability. Which i believe is what Ryback lacks.