Let's play "Name those NFL Stats". | Page 2 | WrestleZone Forums

Let's play "Name those NFL Stats".

I think ESPN got it right last night. The reason the Jets were any good when they went to 2 straight AFC championships was because of their defense. Since they got rid of their old defensive coordinator things have gone to shit. But I think that after this season Rex and Tannabaum need to go.

The defense was the primary reason Denver went to the playoffs with Tebow at the helm. Willis McGahee having the best year of his career didn't hurt things either.

ESPN won't ever report that, though, because ESPN really, really hearts Tim Tebow. They'd have his baby if he was willing to have premarital sex with something.
 
The Jets players were "too good" for Tebow and their coach didn't have the balls to tell them they weren't.

If you really think none of McGahee's success was due to Tebow then you are a moron. Look at his stats in that playoff game and tell me anyone could have done that just because they have a good defense.
 
Denver correctly identified Tebow as their best option last season and everyone got on board.

I assume the Jets planned to use Tebow as their Bobby Valentine strategy. It is hard to say which was a bigger disaster.

Why isn't Tebow a great person?
 
I wonder if CBS would change their nationally televised game if Tebow started either of the Jets last two games. Probably not this late in the season. I want Tebow to start, I don't think he should from an ability perspective but I love this story and the discussion it raises. The longer he sits the less this becomes valid. Let's get Westboro to protest this.

Plus fuck the Jets and not a foot fucking like Rex Ryan loves.
 
Denver correctly identified Tebow as their best option last season and everyone got on board.

I assume the Jets planned to use Tebow as their Bobby Valentine strategy. It is hard to say which was a bigger disaster.

Why isn't Tebow a great person?

Because for Tebow, the best option for his career going into the future would have been to stay in Denver and learn under Peyton Manning.
 
You think the Broncos gave him the option to stay? :lmao:

If that is best you have then he is a better person than I thought.

He could have lobbied to stay. He didn't.

The day Denver signed Peyton, Tebow asked to be traded, because he knew he wasn't going to play. He's not going be playing in New York, either, so again, he's asking to be traded and/or released.

It's his unwillingness to sit on the bench that it the problem. He's not always going to get his way, and he'd better learn to if he wants to hang on in this league. Some of the best in NFL history had to take their medicine and ride the pine and learn before they got their shot. Steve Young, Brett Favre, Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers....
 
It just blows my mind that the Jets trade for what was probably the single most desired guy on the trading block last year, and will now try to sell him after completely destroying his value. If you are going to trade him anyway, why not let him play a bit and try to get his value up? It can't go any lower at this point
 
It just blows my mind that the Jets trade for what was probably the single most desired guy on the trading block last year, and will now try to sell him after completely destroying his value. If you are going to trade him anyway, why not let him play a bit and try to get his value up? It can't go any lower at this point

He was hardly the most desired guy on the trading block. I don't know where you got that from. Just two teams were even close to interested, the Jets and the Jaguars.
 
Were Denver's? They have shit on Tebow too. He's simply not that good as a player, and he isn't the great person people make him out to be.

In Denver, the only person in the entire Bronco organization that didn't like Tebow was John Elway. Ever since the day Tebow was drafted he showed up early to workouts and was the last one to leave. He showed more focus, more drive, and showed a desire to lead and to win. Do you really think anyway was whispering behind Tebow's back when he threw for 300 yards against the Steelers? Or how about when they were winning games with him at the helm?

Because for Tebow, the best option for his career going into the future would have been to stay in Denver and learn under Peyton Manning.

Because that has worked so well for guys like Kevin Kolb, or Chad Henne, who spent their young years behind starting Quarterbacks learning the position? That system doesn't work for everybody.

It's his unwillingness to sit on the bench that it the problem.

Right, because wanting to play and working to be the best option for your team is just the exact opposite thing coaches want to see. ;)

This is something that even Little League coach's preach, if your backup is working harder, and playing harder than your starter, and your starter isn't winning games, than start your backup.

He's not always going to get his way, and he'd better learn to if he wants to hang on in this league. Some of the best in NFL history had to take their medicine and ride the pine and learn before they got their shot. Steve Young, Brett Favre, Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers....

And some of them hopped into the fire of the NFL and became legends, Peyton Manning, Joe Namath, Troy Aikman, John Elway and Dan Marino all come to mind as rookie QB's who didn't learn from the bench, yet after starting their rookie years all but Peyton Manning have found their way to the Hall of Fame so far.

Tebow's a proven winner, and on paper, he's a proven winner and a better passer than Sanchez. Coming from the standpoint of a Bear's fan, I couldn't care if I had a QB throwing the ball underhanded, as long as he is winning the game, that's all that matters.

Tim Tebow has proven to be a winner, and if the Jet's want to get back to the roots that made the team successful, having your team run the ball with Tebow and any set of Runningbacks will work, just ask the Broncos.
 
In Denver, the only person in the entire Bronco organization that didn't like Tebow was John Elway. Ever since the day Tebow was drafted he showed up early to workouts and was the last one to leave. He showed more focus, more drive, and showed a desire to lead and to win. Do you really think anyway was whispering behind Tebow's back when he threw for 300 yards against the Steelers? Or how about when they were winning games with him at the helm?

Nobody shed any tears when he left, and Denver players asked about Tebow after he left have been less than complementary.



Because that has worked so well for guys like Kevin Kolb, or Chad Henne, who spent their young years behind starting Quarterbacks learning the position? That system doesn't work for everybody.

They weren't learning under Peyton Manning, who is a more cerebral quarterback than anybody, well, ever.


Right, because wanting to play and working to be the best option for your team is just the exact opposite thing coaches want to see. ;)

When the player in question doesn't understand NFL level offenses at all, they want the player learning the system so when called upon, they can implement it.

This is something that even Little League coach's preach, if your backup is working harder, and playing harder than your starter, and your starter isn't winning games, than start your backup.

The backup is Greg McElroy. He is playing.

And some of them hopped into the fire of the NFL and became legends, Peyton Manning, Joe Namath, Troy Aikman, John Elway and Dan Marino all come to mind as rookie QB's who didn't learn from the bench, yet after starting their rookie years all but Peyton Manning have found their way to the Hall of Fame so far.

They were all capable of running the complexities of a full NFL offense out of the gate. They came from pro style systems in college, not a spread offense that relies on one read and go.

Tebow's a proven winner, and on paper, he's a proven winner and a better passer than Sanchez. Coming from the standpoint of a Bear's fan, I couldn't care if I had a QB throwing the ball underhanded, as long as he is winning the game, that's all that matters.

Sanchez has been deeper in the playoffs than Tebow. Twice.

Tim Tebow has proven to be a winner, and if the Jet's want to get back to the roots that made the team successful, having your team run the ball with Tebow and any set of Runningbacks will work, just ask the Broncos.

They could get a capable running back and do the same with Sanchez. When he had Thomas Jones, then LaDanian Tomlinson at his disposal, they won. With Shonn Green, not so much.
 
Nobody shed any tears when he left, and Denver players asked about Tebow after he left have been less than complementary.

Right, they also had Peyton freaking Manning join the team to replace him. I bet if John Elway went out of his way to pick up Brady Quinn, Chadd Henne or gave the starter job back to Kyle Orton the team would have been in a lot worse of a shape and bashing themselves in the head for losing an important piece to their offense.


When the player in question doesn't understand NFL level offenses at all, they want the player learning the system so when called upon, they can implement it.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Denver was beating teams with an offense that even my High School used. John Madden can attest that sometimes the best way is the simple way.



The backup is Greg McElroy. He is playing.

And we question why the Jet's Franchise is a mess again? :shrug:



They were all capable of running the complexities of a full NFL offense out of the gate. They came from pro style systems in college, not a spread offense that relies on one read and go.

Drew Brees ran a spread offense in Purdue, yet he seemed to pan out alright in the NFL.



Sanchez has been deeper in the playoffs than Tebow. Twice.

He also had a very solid team around them that made up for his below average play. Tebow took a team that was only getting worse yet John Fox saw what he had with Tebow and made the shifts and moves and suddenly their in the playoff picture.


They could get a capable running back and do the same with Sanchez. When he had Thomas Jones, then LaDanian Tomlinson at his disposal, they won. With Shonn Green, not so much.

Agreed, but when you have Tebow, who is perhaps the best athlete on the Jet's roster, why not use him the same way they used him in Denver? If you can get one extra runner out there with 3 average running backs you'll pan out to have a very solid Running team. A value which Ryan holds high, right next to feet.
 
I see your point, I guess most just don't buy into him for the very reasons you mentioned. Sure, he has won, but he did have one of the NFL's best defenses.
Yes, except for in the games where they gave up 49, 29, 45, 32, 41, 40 and 45 points in a game (you know, almost half of the number of games they played for the season). They also ranked 26th in scoring defense last year, according to Skip Bayless this morning.

A lot of those games were kept close due to the Denver defense.
And won by Tebow's offense. :shrug:

Tebow looked bad for most of the game and eventually made key plays
Again, according to Skip Bayless (a guy I can't stand, but I just heard these this morning as he's also a Tebow fan), he was #1 in QB Rating in the last 5 minutes of the game last year. #1 in the entire league in the last 5 minutes.

but I guess you can't take the wins away from him.
You can't.

But he was still mostly a game manager.
As was Alex Smith and the 49ers made it to the NFC Championship game, and should have made it to the Super Bowl, if not for Ted Ginn's injury.

I don't think he'd be able to keep up in a shoot-out.
He scored 29 points against the NFL's best defense last year. Just saying.

But so what if he can't keep up in a shootout? Are you really ready to dismiss an 8-5 record because there might be games where your defense sucks?

I'd find it interesting if someone gave him another shot, and it could happen elsewhere. It'd certainly be entertaining to watch.
I can think of several teams that need a QB and a few wins.
mark_sanchez_no_beard114659--300x300.jpg


In fact, he went to the AFC Championship game in both his rookie and sophmore seasons.
Mark Sanchez has arguably worse numbers than Tebow last year and was STILL the starter this year. Tebow had virtually zero interest from other teams and Ryan will barely even let him off the bench.

And that was why they went Sanchez over Tebow all year long. Sanchez is their guy, Tebow is the new guy. The guy you spend a first and second round pick (as well as 3 useless guys) on gets a shot ahead of the backup option the owner/GM wanted.
Understandable, but that just goes back to what I've said about the "intelligent football minds". Despite a season that's crashing and burning, they still are scared to put Tebow in the game.

I don't think Rex ever wanted Tebow, hence why he never gave him a shot to play consistently. Ownership and the GM wanted him. Rex got stuck with him.
I'll agree 100% to that.

You answered your own question. He doesn't fit the mold of an NFL QB. He is horribly inaccurate and a terrible pocket passer, and his running style is unlike that of most NFL running QBs. Hence, most teams don't want to try and change an entire offense just to adhere to a Tebow offense.
Perhaps, but how silly is that for a team like the Chiefs or the Raiders or the Jaguars or the Titans or the Bills? These are teams which haven't been relevant, nor had a good starting QB, in such a long time. The only one who has come close is the Raiders, but Carson Palmer isn't what he was.

Again, the "most intelligent football minds" just don't seem to be very smart to me.

Absolutely spot on.

And his religion definitely plays a role. Not in the sense that he is a Christian, but how vocal he is about it gets on peoples nerves sometimes.
I'll agree 100% with that.

Wasn't the mindset of the Jets in their past two AFC Championships playing a Run heavy offense with a shutdown Defense?

Yes.
I wouldn't want Tebow either. More because you already have a good idea what you will get out of him, and that isn't good. It maybe better to give McElroy a chance, at least you don't know yet what he can do. The season for them is over, so what does he have to lose?

Take the unknown over the known, if the known is crap at least you may get surprised.

How do you know Tebow is crap, when he went 8-5 and won a playoff game against the best defense in the league?
I don't think Tebow is the answer for the Jets. I have major reservations about his long term talent, but putting all of that aside, you can't throw him into this mess and not expect him to suffer. I think Sanchez can still be a serviceable NFL QB, but not in NY, he is mentally defeated and the same would happen to Tebow.
From everything I've seen and heard, Tebow would be far more likely to handle NY than Sanchez has been.

Ryan has to go though.
100%

And it's not even so much his coaching record as it is the absolute circus which surrounds the Jets because of him. Without the stupid stuff he does and says, I could see the Jets giving him another year or two. But what he's turned the Jets into is simply ridiculous, and no self-respecting team would ever want their name sullied the way Ryan has sullied the Jets name.

The defense was the primary reason Denver went to the playoffs with Tebow at the helm.
Those 5 fourth quarter comebacks in 6 games didn't hurt either.

Willis McGahee having the best year of his career didn't hurt things either.
When the QB is also a threat to run, it opens things up more for the tailback.

ESPN won't ever report that, though, because ESPN really, really hearts Tim Tebow. They'd have his baby if he was willing to have premarital sex with something.
We're obviously listening to different aspects of ESPN, because I've yet to hear anyone besides Skip Bayless consistently defend Tim Tebow as a quarterback.

The Jets players were "too good" for Tebow and their coach didn't have the balls to tell them they weren't.

If you really think none of McGahee's success was due to Tebow then you are a moron. Look at his stats in that playoff game and tell me anyone could have done that just because they have a good defense.

It happens so rarely, I just thought I ought to point out when we totally agree.
I wonder if CBS would change their nationally televised game if Tebow started either of the Jets last two games. Probably not this late in the season.
If he were to start and win this week, I'm sure he'd be on the next week. Tebow is huge ratings.
Because for Tebow, the best option for his career going into the future would have been to stay in Denver and learn under Peyton Manning.

:lmao:

So Tim Tebow is not a great guy because Denver traded him without Tebow's consent after acquiring one of the greatest quarterbacks in history?
He could have lobbied to stay. He didn't.
So because he didn't beg a guy in John Elway, who never wanted him, to stay where he wasn't wanted just so he could sit and collect a paycheck he didn't earn that means he's not a great guy?

You have a very strange sense of what it means to be a good person.

He's not going be playing in New York, either, so again, he's asking to be traded and/or released.
As well he should, as well as anyone sane person would do.

This is Tebow's career, and the Jets have actively worked to destroy his reputation. Just because he wants out of a situation which is actively seeking to destroy his earning power, that doesn't make him a bad guy. That makes him a rational guy.

It's his unwillingness to sit on the bench that it the problem.
Bull-fucking-shit. He sat the bench his entire first year in Denver. He's sat the bench this year, while Mark Sanchez is fumbling head first into his own lineman's ass. He's sat as the Jets have brought their three ring circus to every television in the country.

And through it all, until he was shafted again this week, Tebow never publicly spoke one word of complaint, never once indicated any kind of frustration to his teammates or the media, and did nothing but the best he could at any situation he was asked to do.

The problem is the Jets have no leadership.
 
We're obviously listening to different aspects of ESPN, because I've yet to hear anyone besides Skip Bayless consistently defend Tim Tebow as a quarterback.

I don't think he means the football analysts so much as the network execs. They realize how much he brings in ratings so they put him on all the time last year. There was a full episode of SportsCenter about Tebow. Now that may happen for others, but I personally have never witnessed that. The analysts probably hate on him because he wins as a "mediocre" or "less than adequate" quarterback. "He has to have the offense catered to him to be successful" type argument most likely.
 
They realize how much he brings in ratings so they put him on all the time last year. There was a full episode of SportsCenter about Tebow. Now that may happen for others, but I personally have never witnessed that.
LeBron James comes to mind.
 
Was that just a regular SportsCenter, or a special like his decision? Legitimate question. Only times I flip on ESPN now are to see if they are going to have a segment about my favorite teams.

I think it was a special, but they spent most of the night talking about it.
 
Right, they also had Peyton freaking Manning join the team to replace him. I bet if John Elway went out of his way to pick up Brady Quinn, Chadd Henne or gave the starter job back to Kyle Orton the team would have been in a lot worse of a shape and bashing themselves in the head for losing an important piece to their offense.

Fair enough.




If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Denver was beating teams with an offense that even my High School used. John Madden can attest that sometimes the best way is the simple way.

That can only work so long. Atlanta, then Philly dumbed down their respective offenses for Michael Vick, and both times, it worked great for a year, then teams figured out to stop it and his effectiveness dropped too.


And we question why the Jet's Franchise is a mess again? :shrug:

I agree. Another questionable decision they made in the decline is trading for Santonio Holmes, who was a known locker room cancer in Pittsburgh. Not surprisingly, the rumors of the Jets locker room being toxic started when Santonio arrived.


Drew Brees ran a spread offense in Purdue, yet he seemed to pan out alright in the NFL.

True, I'll give you that. RGIII played a spread too, and it looks like he might end up being pretty good too.


He also had a very solid team around them that made up for his below average play. Tebow took a team that was only getting worse yet John Fox saw what he had with Tebow and made the shifts and moves and suddenly their in the playoff picture.

Denver's defense was dominant. They were losing under Orton because Orton isn't that good. Tebow replaced him and managed the games quite efficiently. As far as playing very well, he had one great game as a starter, the playoff game against the Steelers, who have notoriously been bad against athletic quarterbacks.


Agreed, but when you have Tebow, who is perhaps the best athlete on the Jet's roster, why not use him the same way they used him in Denver? If you can get one extra runner out there with 3 average running backs you'll pan out to have a very solid Running team. A value which Ryan holds high, right next to feet.

He is a spectacular athlete, that's why I think his best use is a utility player than can do all sorts of things. Line him up as a receiver, h-back, tailback, tight end, fullback, even have him quarterback occasionally. All over the place, actually. That would confuse the shit out of opposing defenses. That's where I think the Jets dropped the ball with him the most. They failed to use his athletic talents to maximum potential.
 
Sounds about right either way. Polarizing figures like them draw people in. Simple numbers game, and as annoying as it is for me, it gets them ratings.
 
Sounds about right either way. Polarizing figures like them draw people in. Simple numbers game, and as annoying as it is for me, it gets them ratings.

Which I think was the only reason why the Jaguars were really interested in Tebow in the first place, Jacksonville has a shit attendance rating and bringing in Tebow, a local icon would pack the seats, even if he gets the treatment he got with the Jets.
 
I think ESPN got it right last night. The reason the Jets were any good when they went to 2 straight AFC championships was because of their defense. Since they got rid of their old defensive coordinator things have gone to shit. But I think that after this season Rex and Tannabaum need to go.
Mike Pettine has been the Defensive Coordinator since 2009 when Rex came aboard. He was formerly a defensive position coach with the Ravens and Rex brought him along.

His predecessor at Defensive Coordinator was Bob Sutton, who has been with the Jets since 2000, and was D-Coordinator under Eric Mangini. He is still on the staff as a Assistant Head Coach/Linebackers coach.

He has been there the whole time, they never got rid of the D-Coordinator. Hell, I would be more surprised if the way he leaves is to get a Head Coaching job somewhere. The D has been beast for 4 years now. They got rid of the O Coordinator Brian Schottenheimer this past offseason (which was the right move) and brought in Tony Sparano (which was the wrong move).

Mark Sanchez has arguably worse numbers than Tebow last year and was STILL the starter this year. Tebow had virtually zero interest from other teams and Ryan will barely even let him off the bench.

Understandable, but that just goes back to what I've said about the "intelligent football minds". Despite a season that's crashing and burning, they still are scared to put Tebow in the game.
Someone else said it, but they know what they could get out of Tebow, they need to see what they can get from McElroy. The season is already over as they are eliminated from Playoff Contention.

I'll agree 100% to that.

Perhaps, but how silly is that for a team like the Chiefs or the Raiders or the Jaguars or the Titans or the Bills? These are teams which haven't been relevant, nor had a good starting QB, in such a long time. The only one who has come close is the Raiders, but Carson Palmer isn't what he was.
Oh it would be incredibly silly to not give them a chance, but only if they cannot find a different quarterback. If they can't get a conventional quarterback (one that doesn't force you to change your offensive gameplan like Tebow) then a team is better off with Tebow. If the Jets cut Tebow, I think there will be more teams interested, since they won't have to give up anything other then money.


Again, the "most intelligent football minds" just don't seem to be very smart to me.
They're smart, they are just slow to recognize change. All sports are like that. Baseball didn't give any advanced metrics a second thought until the Red Sox took Billy Beanes strategy and mixed it with stars and won. They also were against Free Agency until it was proven successful, against black players, and against everything else until it was proven to work.


I'll agree 100% with that.



From everything I've seen and heard, Tebow would be far more likely to handle NY than Sanchez has been.
Sanchez handled it fine until Tebow was brought in to pull the rug out from under him.

100%

And it's not even so much his coaching record as it is the absolute circus which surrounds the Jets because of him. Without the stupid stuff he does and says, I could see the Jets giving him another year or two. But what he's turned the Jets into is simply ridiculous, and no self-respecting team would ever want their name sullied the way Ryan has sullied the Jets name.
See, I don't see the problem with what he says. There have been VERY few instances where he says something that can be perceived as negative towards another team, and when they are, he recognizes the mistake and apologizes for it. Everything else he says is talking positive about his team. Sure the media makes a big fuss about what he says, but really it's better then the alternative. Mangini made the team sound terrible and lucky to win whatever they won. I'd rather be told we're good then be told we suck.

And to be fair, he did a hell of a lot to build the Jets up his first 2 years. And the media perceives them to have fallen a lot more then they actually have. They were 8-8 last year and the media makes it sound like they were 2-14. This year will be either 8-8 or 7-9, and it sounds again like a 2-14 year according to the media.

Besides, the team assembled by the GM is total shit. Rex needs a GM that isn't shit, and that knows who to draft and who to sign. Get a GM in there who will get guys that actually talent and they're a 11 win team (like they were in 2010 when they had talent).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top