I think someone already said it before. We are nothing but internet smarks who post on a wrestling forum. How, why and for what reasons would we post anything besides our opinions?
But I get the question. There really is no FACTUAL evidence that John Cena isn't good at what he does. On the contrary, considering that he is the leader of this generation's product, I think it gives us enough fact to believe that he's about a billion times better than most of us think.
But what criteria do we base our arguments on? How should we judge Cena? History has proven that the top guys in the business aren't always the greatest in-ring technicians (Hogan, Austin). I always felt that the top guy should be the one who "entertains" us the most. Let's face it; pro-wrestling is about entertainment. No one creates and extends a feud better than Cena right now. And when it all boils down, Cena always finds a way to keep us intrigued, cut great promos, put on exciting matches, and look like the top guy of a billion dollar entertainment corporation.
Therefore, like I said earlier, if the "facts" prove anything, I'd say it proves that Cena is leaps and bounds better than all of the haters make him out to be. The proof is in the pudding... and the pudding is WWE management's judgement on who their top dog will be.
But I get the question. There really is no FACTUAL evidence that John Cena isn't good at what he does. On the contrary, considering that he is the leader of this generation's product, I think it gives us enough fact to believe that he's about a billion times better than most of us think.
But what criteria do we base our arguments on? How should we judge Cena? History has proven that the top guys in the business aren't always the greatest in-ring technicians (Hogan, Austin). I always felt that the top guy should be the one who "entertains" us the most. Let's face it; pro-wrestling is about entertainment. No one creates and extends a feud better than Cena right now. And when it all boils down, Cena always finds a way to keep us intrigued, cut great promos, put on exciting matches, and look like the top guy of a billion dollar entertainment corporation.
Therefore, like I said earlier, if the "facts" prove anything, I'd say it proves that Cena is leaps and bounds better than all of the haters make him out to be. The proof is in the pudding... and the pudding is WWE management's judgement on who their top dog will be.