I'm not even going to read these 10 pages so I'm probably just reapeating what everybody else is saying: This is not 1986, wrestling (to a degree) has moved beyond the limitions of huge physiques.
If Punk wasn't over, if he wasn't selling merch and selling PPVs then we would know his physique was limiting him. Then we'd know he wasn't successful and he was, indeed, too small.
I don't understand the logic behind much of what goes on in these forums. "CM Punk is small, people aren't going to be able to take him seriously." How can you make that argument? I'm sorry, that's absolutely fucking ricockulous.
He's one of the top 3 guys in the entire company, if his size was a hinderence or an "issue" then he wouldn't have gotten to where he is today. I'm not a massive Punk fan but even I will concede that, looking at where Punk is in his career, his size is not an issue.
Idiots.
If Punk wasn't over, if he wasn't selling merch and selling PPVs then we would know his physique was limiting him. Then we'd know he wasn't successful and he was, indeed, too small.
I don't understand the logic behind much of what goes on in these forums. "CM Punk is small, people aren't going to be able to take him seriously." How can you make that argument? I'm sorry, that's absolutely fucking ricockulous.
He's one of the top 3 guys in the entire company, if his size was a hinderence or an "issue" then he wouldn't have gotten to where he is today. I'm not a massive Punk fan but even I will concede that, looking at where Punk is in his career, his size is not an issue.
Idiots.