Haven't they been doing that for years now? How much more time do they need to build him up? He was in the main event of a few PPVs a few years ago and then they dropped it. I get that he was probably wanted him to be that next guy, but I don't think they had to pick Roode, who is probably one of the weakest guys they could have picked.
I don't watch TNA regularly, but from the research I've gathered (read: Wikipedia research) it doesn't seem to me they dropped it, as much as got him exposure, backed off to build him up more, and then initiated BFG Series to put him over.
If he's too injured to do anything other than that, yeah. Have him throw a Carbon Footprint (if he could have) and pin them fast that way if nothing else.
Again, that's just cheap and hurts the credibility of the entire process, as well as the other wrestlers in the Series.
I'm certainly not speaking for the masses, but I've seen enough AJ vs. Daniels to last me multiple lifetimes. Lynn, I have zero interest in seeing on PPV as well.
I love AJ vs. Daniels. And, like you, I have no interest in seeing Lynn, but as you said, we don't represent the TNA masses.
As in internet marks that are probably going to watch the show online for free?
No, as in the Internet marks who buy TNA PPVs on an irregular basis, but would strongly consider buying this PPV because it's BFG.
If you have Persons A-Z, Persons A,T, and Z might buy the January PPV. B and C might buy the February PPV. A, F, and P might buy March. And so on and down the line.
But for Bound For Glory, you want Persons A-Z buying the show.
What you're saying makes sense, but I disagreed with most of the upper midcard booking for BFG in the first place. What I saw worked for the most part, but if they took off AJ vs. Daniels, things could have been shuffled quite a bit.
I don't see why it was necessary.
From most things I've read, the Bound For Glory card was quite good.
So....started watching the show right now. I have a theory, hopefully an original one. What if this whole Hogan/Sting/Bischoff angle was a kind of way for Hogan and Bischoff to try to pay Sting back for Starrcade 97? Think about it, they had Hogan tapping like a bitch in the middle of the ring clean for Sting at BFG and this whole angle has been about how Bischoff led Hogan astray and how he took it out on Sting unfairly. Isn't that sort of a mirror image of what actually happened in WCW and now TNA? I mean, Bischoff and Hogan were sharks back then, I don't know if they still are (who knows with all this Roode/Storm talk) but the fact that they did this whole program to put Sting over seems pretty cool. But then of course afterwards Hogan had to Hulk Up and take the spotlight. But I think Sting may have wanted that. I don't know, I'm probably just reading too far into things kayfabe and non-kayfabe. I'm a bit drunk and rambling.
I really enjoyed Bound for Glory. I REALLY fucking hope 2012 is a better, new, original, creative, not piece-of-shit year like 2010 and 2011 were for the most part for this company.
I thought about that as well, though I don't know if I'd say it was for Sting as much as I would say it was for the wrestling fans. Perhaps both.