Why is it ridiculous? You don't like to think it is that way, but it is.
No, it's not. Not all wrestlers are created equal. Bad wrestlers will not be successful. It doesn't matter how hard you book certain wrestlers, if they are not deserving of being a superstar, the fans will not accept them.
Take Batista for example, he got a big push despite all the cons weighed against him.
Cons like an incredible look, very good ring skills, great charisma and a larger than life character?
Please understand wrestling if you're going to discuss it with me.
There are and were plenty of people with better ring skills and better mic skills.
But there are not plenty of people who have all of them together.
There are/were plenty of guys more over and plenty more marketable.
Obviously not. If that were true, then why would Batista always be a main-eventer?
The WWE isn't stupid, they are not going to put in the main-event someone who doesn't draw well. This isn't junior high, where we go against our own self-interests because we're having a girl feud. This is the big leagues of wrestling, it is a publicly shared company...the WWE is going to do what makes the most money.
WWE, just like many other companies is prone to politics and a certain degree of nepotism. I'm sorry to say that you're just naive or ignorant if you really don't think it happens.
The WWE is far more driven by profits. They go with what they think will make money. They have a financial duty to shareholders to maximize their profits.
At the end of the day, you're pretending this is junior high school. It's not. This is a global wrestling promotion...they're going to do what makes money. Just because you are not privy to the information they have regarding drawing, it doesn't change the fact you're wrong.
Jeez, if you really think the only thing that matters is how good you are, i hate to break it to you buddy...
Jeez, if you really think you understand anything about pro wrestling, I hate to break it to you pal...