You mean this part?
That part? Yeah, that had absolutely dick to do with you thanking people. The only part of your OP that had anything to do was HALF of a sentence in a paragraph.
But i did say it though didn't I? Regardless of what percentage of the post it took up, i did still say it.
I read your OP, and it was you trying to backdoor you way into salvaging your ego for other posters if you got banned. I'm not an idiot, I know EXACTLY what you were doing.
No you're not an idiot, but you don't know anything about why i started this. Why would i need to salvage my ego to people who don't even know what was going on? I post so infrequently in so few threads, that it'd probably have been 6 months before anyone even noticed that i'd gone.
You made a private grievance public, just so you could tell everyone you said for D-Man to ban you and you even managed to throw in the entire Staff, to make it appear as a conspiracy.
Er, no. I said that if we did go into full details, you'd back D-Man, based on what actually happened. You'd be right to back him too, i never said you'd be wrong to, all i said was, you'd all back him without having to think about it because i obviously deserved some form of punishment. I assumed because even after the warning i'd given D-Man more grief, that I'd be gone. Where are the conspiracy theories there exactly?
I know exactly what you were doing. And I called you on it, so now you're busy trying to deny it.
Again, no you don't
know anything. You've jumped to a conclusion. Unless you were in the room with me at the time i started all this, then you don't
know anything. You've accused me of something, i've said you're wrong, and now you're just repeating the same accusation as if that's suddenly going to make it true. By all means Sly, accuse me til you're blue in the face, but you don't
know and never will
know why i started this, if you continue to disregard the reasons i've already explained.
Exactly. And both of you got upset, you both likely resorted to insults, you might have accused him of being a poor or biased moderator, and then, in a huff, you told him to ban you because you think something wasn't fair or right.
At no point, and hopefully if D-Man did read this, he'd at least stand up and defend me when i say that i never said he was a poor or biased moderator. What i actually said was that i was disappointed in him because he didn't read all of my post before jumping to a conclusion, which he even admitted during the argument. The argument stemmed from him just repeatedly shrugging me off and assuming i was whining about rep, when rep was the least important aspect of my issue with his statement in the beginning. I'm trying to explain to the guy why he shouldn't label me as a a certain type of fan, and all he could do was keep going back to me whining about rep, so it felt like he still wasn't even reading what i was saying to him.
This is also one of the reasons why i didn't go into detail in the first place, because as soon as 'rep' is mentioned, that's the only word anyone will focus on from that moment on. This was not about red rep, but D-Man refused to believe that and we argued and it got ugly.
I've been in hundreds of those conversations.
I'm sure you do. I don't mean that in a disrespectful way, but i'm sure there's lots of posters who bang on at you specifically Sly.
Sure you did. You let everyone know that if you got banned, it was because YOU told D-Man to ban you, and that the Staff would conspire against the regular members to support the ban.
No, that's how you've interpreted it, what i meant was i assumed you'd think him banning me was justified based on how it went down.
I read between the lines very well.
OR..... you're paranoid because you get so much grief from other posters because you're on the staff and seemingly manage to piss so many people off with you posts.
Either you're not as smart as I thought you were, or you think I'm dumber than I am, either way, this quote is incredibly inaccurate.
By all means, enlighten me as to why it's innaccurate.
Yes, that's what I do. I go around to every thread and just put "I'm right". Nevermind that pesky spam rule, and the fact I present details and facts, I just say "I'm right" and go on.
Yeah, ok i exaggerated there.
Not in your original posts no, of course not, but when i read most debates you have with some people, you're repsonses to certain aspects do literally just say things like, 'Because i'm right' or 'Because Wrestler-A is shit' and then never say anything else to actually back that statement up. I've asked you in numerous threads to explain why you feel a certain way about certain talent, and i don't think you've actually responded once.
Yes, this is about YOUR ego, as you had to let everyone know YOU requested to be banned,
I didn't request anything. What would be the point in requesting to be banned when i could just up and never come back to the site? I don't need to be banned to never come back ya know.
I DARED him to ban me. That's not the same as asking someone to do it, now is it?
and you wanted everyone to know why you were banned. It was all about your ego.
Because I got in an argument with a MOD and was being a dick about it. We both were, but he's got the authority and was justified to use it, and i'm just a poster with a lot of mouth. I still don't really see how i've done this to boost my own ego. I've admitted i was in the wrong multiple times already.
