Little Jerry Lawler
Sigmund Freud On Ritalin And Roids
Anybody else doing a fantasy football league on Yahoo or ESPN?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Барбоса;4591333 said:The US Women's Golf Team in the Solheim Cup (the ladies version of the Ryder Cup) have adopted John Cena's "You Can't See Me" as their signature celebration.
Barbosa, if you ever start to feel left out with the American football talk, just switch it up to BPL talk. Everton drew today. I didn't see it, but I heard they looked good.
This is one of the very few things that can even make me slightly care about women's golf, let alone golf period.
Barbosa, if you ever start to feel left out with the American football talk, just switch it up to BPL talk. Everton drew today. I didn't see it, but I heard they looked good.
Барбоса;4591369 said:Looked more dynamic going forward than usual but far less solid at the back.
Unsurprising given their new manager and his reputation for attacking but frequently futile football.
I'm no Barbosa, but I did watch the main highlights programme and subsequently had to listen to the presenter/ex-pro big up a young player as the future of England's national team... after his 5th start for his parent club. Fucking ridiculous.
It looked like a good game though and I've decided to claim Norwich, who Everton were playing, as my second team as they are the closest Premier League team to MY Cambridge.
With Tim Howar another year older and a fairly mediocre mix of players in the back that seems like a tall task.
If Notts gets promoted, I'll have to choose between them.
I'd probably rather have Jackson than Ridley, especially if it's a PPR league. Jordy is already hurt & was hurt a lot of last year, of the Packers three main WR's he's probably the last I would want.
Ridley is gonna be a touchdown machine I'd rather have him.
Phil Hartman is awesome.
Carry on.
NE has 4 other RBs on their roster that Ridley could end up splitting time with, outside of Brady there are few Pats I would trust.
And yet he had nearly 1300 yards rushing and 12 TDs last year in a similar situation. Ridley is their main back and the Pats are gonna run the ball a lot more this year to take the pressure off Brady.
Jackson had a 1000 yards and 4 TDs. Yes I know he's on a better team this year, but he's never been big on getting TDs. Even if Ridley drops off TD wise a touch he's still gonna be more valuable than Jackson. I hated Ridley last year as a Brady owner. He had a ton of TDs at the goal line that I was expecting a pass to Gronk or Hernandez. Ridley arrived last year and he's only going to get more work as the number 1 running back. Jackson isn't nearly what he used to be and Ridley is ascending. I'd much rather have Ridley because even if he only gets 1000 yards and 5 TDs, its what Jackson is going to give you. However the potential with Ridley is significantly better than Jackson. You could see 1500 and 15 TDs with Ridley this year.
I know I'm gonna be targeting Ridley in my money league draft tomorrow. I've never been really bullish on getting running backs but this year I'm going to be. Lots of depth at QB and WR so unless by some miracle Rodgers is there when I pick round one, I'm going Running Back. I'm hoping that I can get the 2nd/3rd overall pick as my league has gone QB happy round 1. Last year we had 4 QB's taken in the first 5 picks. Rodgers, Brees, Brady, then Foster, then Cam Newton. Stafford was shortly after that group as well. If I can get in that top 5, and everyone goes QB happy, I'll snap up Peterson in a heart beat and then come back around for another quality RB second round. Hell if there's someone there in the third that slid down, I'm taking a RB first three rounds.
QB's and RB's are the most important parts of my league. 6 pts for passing TDs, and bonus points for 100+ yard games and 200+ yard games. No bonuses for receivers other than PPR, but again the depth at receiver is ridiculous. Last year I had at least 5 receivers at all times that were pretty much a given starting. Running back I had Peterson and nothing else as Mcfadden busted badly for me.
I know I'm gonna be targeting Ridley in my money league draft tomorrow. I've never been really bullish on getting running backs but this year I'm going to be. Lots of depth at QB and WR so unless by some miracle Rodgers is there when I pick round one, I'm going Running Back. I'm hoping that I can get the 2nd/3rd overall pick as my league has gone QB happy round 1. Last year we had 4 QB's taken in the first 5 picks. Rodgers, Brees, Brady, then Foster, then Cam Newton. Stafford was shortly after that group as well. If I can get in that top 5, and everyone goes QB happy, I'll snap up Peterson in a heart beat and then come back around for another quality RB second round. Hell if there's someone there in the third that slid down, I'm taking a RB first three rounds.
QB's and RB's are the most important parts of my league. 6 pts for passing TDs, and bonus points for 100+ yard rushing games and 200+ yard rushing games. No bonuses for receivers other than PPR, but again the depth at receiver is ridiculous. Last year I had at least 5 receivers at all times that were pretty much a given starting. Running back I had Peterson and nothing else as Mcfadden busted badly for me.
an RB on the same team as Thomas Brady though? With Blount waiting in the wings behind him?
I keep talking shit that im gonna take Tebow. Wouldnt it be funny if he ends being their goal line FB and getting ten TDs or something
You are exactly proving why Ridley will not be as successful as he was last year.Just saying. He was on the same team as Brady last year and had nearly 1300 and 12 TDs. And that was with Gronk, Hernandez, and Welker. This year he's got....Amendola who is a very poor man's Welker. Oh and Amendola is injury prone as well. Next you have Gronk who will get back...eventually. I'm not worried about Blount, he'll get touches but the Pats LOVE Ridley and he's their clear number one running back. Woodhead's worthless fantasy football carcass shipped off to San Diego so that clears it up as well.
You are exactly proving why Ridley will not be as successful as he was last year.
New England no longer has receiving threats that garner the attention of multiple defenders. And by losing the Tight Ends, the Safeties and linebackers do not have to worry about them as much, and they will as such be better against the run.
I highly doubt any Pats running back reaches 1000 yards. MAYBE you get some TDs when they're in the red area, but again the safeties and linebackers will be able to worry more about the run game then in previous years, so I doubt even that will happen.
Respect!