Daniel Bryan Released *GIVE OPINIONS* | Page 22 | WrestleZone Forums

Daniel Bryan Released *GIVE OPINIONS*

Pathetic attempt to flame another user. I dont get what this guys problem is. He's PMing me his shitty messages as well. Have you got swine flu or something ?! Just wait for Monday night and see if Roberts gets booed. I think he will. What will you do ? Shut the majority up with more of your putrid posts. Stop flaming other posters you idiot.


Just as you are free to post opinion, I am free to post rebuttal. That's not flaming, that's posting. Flaming is sending me threatening PM's full of racist language. You are possibly the worst troll I've ever seen.

And still, can you answer the question. I'm sure assholes like you will boo Justin Roberts, but can you explain why in a way that makes any kind of sense? Can you justify why he deserves such treatment like what you called for? This is obviously out of his hands, so I'd love to see your response.
 
Given the choice, yes. There far less chance of death in getting hit in the shoulder than there is in choking someone. I thought that was pretty obvious.



Let's hope it never comes to that.



You do know that the east coast feed many satellite and cable companies provide out here on the west coast starts at 6pm, right? Not everyone is on at the same time. And just because your parents forced to bed doesn't mean every other kid of that age in America is in bed. While the parents are responsible for controlling what their child watches, WWE is the one making a PG promise. What are you trying to prove?



Actually...





Whom ever it upset wasn't somebody on production, and the director and the camera were ready with every angle and shot. This was something someone over McMahon's head who called foul only after it had been aired. Assuming this to be legit, there are plenty of reasons to justify firing Bryan immediately.



The Chair Shot rule was implemented into the Wellness Policy in a public manner. The rumored choke rule was placed in effect to downplay any connection to Chris Benoit, so yeah, I don't think it's something you are going to find on the company website. It's an internal PR thing, not public policy. And again, this is likely coming from even above the WWE, so the chair shot rule has nothing to do with it. Sorry.



Blood? Not often outside of PPVs. Sex? Ms. Kitty took off her top at Armaggedon, I think. And then the Lita/Edge thing (barf). Unless you liked watching a granny give birth to a hand, the sex element was done pretty damn badly. Also, if you need sex that badly, get a life. Drug references? Oh, like The Godfather and the lame pot references. That shit was never edgy, it was tacky, and this is coming from a stoner. I should have guessed you were just another "superczena is lame" loser.



When I said "you" I meant it about the one holding the drugs, silly. That's how money is made.

Okay so you are saying that if a 7 year old boy does a piledriver on his 6 year old friend and causes, internal brain damage causing him to be on life support is better then a 7 year old putting an incorrect sleeperhold on the same 6 year old friend is better wow, remind never to leave any child with you. Well on the East coast little kids should be in bed at a ceartin time for school, now on the west coast little 5 year olds shouldn't be watching wrestling they should be watching spongebod or whatever fuckin cartoons are on, not prowrestling. Also Vince should be mad at the who ever is running the camera for putting that on t.v. and showing it on the big screen because Danielson was doing his job and he was told to go ahead and put him in a camel clutch type move so the guy who aloud that on t.v. should have been fired not Danielson. There is no reason to fire Danelson, that was only one offenese to Bryan it was a shame it was his Frist and only offense. When you are friends of some wrestlers in the bussiness you learn how backstage shit works but you wouldn't know that. Now its time for your lesson in Wrestling History, ECW had a sex angle involving lesbians and they kissed eachother in the middle of the ring and was awesome..:) Sable showing her playboy cover was awesome and if you would go on youtube and watching a RAW segment called Sable in the Sack, yeah. You also had the Infamous Brian Pillmin XXX enough said on that. Sunny the original Diva comming down in barly anything almost every monday is a sexy thing. So I gave you a lot of shit that you happened to leave out. Also the May Young giving birth to a hand was just disturbing that fact that you brought that up just makes me what to ask you "What in the blue hell is wrong with you, people are trying to forget that". And theres the suprised Your a stoner that was a real shocker I did not know that given the fact that you are most likey high right now and have nothing better to do then have something to eat and sit by your computer. Also I don't give a flying fuck how drug money is made I have nothing to do with that shit and I will never have anything to do with that shit.
 
I'm no sure that enough people going to the event tomorrow know who Justin Roberts is, especially since most of the crowd is gonna be kids. best case scenereo is for a group of people start a chant. Maybe a remark by Cole could give it away. If they ignore it completely than i don't know

I have spent the weekend theorising that if they dont mention him, its legit and if they do then its a work. But who is to say WWE isnt reading our thoughts on the forums, people's reaction on twitter and facebook, and seeing that we are basing our expectations on what they do or dont say. With that in mind, they could just change their plans on monday, and decide to remove any reference of Danielson from what they had planned in order to further the work (if this is a work, I am not sure myself).

All I can say is that the whole Bryan Danielson situation, since his debut on nXt has been different to any other wrestler in WWE history. They have shown a willingness to acknowledge the indies and the IWC in public, which as far as I know they have never done before. If they were going to make a play on the IWC with anyone on their roster, it would have been Danielson.

JR's blog comment was horribly vague, he didnt actually offer anything concrete on the situation. Danielson himself has been frustratingly vague aswell on his twitter feed, I would have thought if he was legit fired he would have vented some feeling on the situation, and I am sure WWE wouldnt have held it against him in the long run.

Now we have this Cena tweet, which does seem very 'in character' for Cena. He wants a chance at revenge fairly on Danielson, and is willing to support the fans in their quest to see him re-instated. I dont really know the inner workings of WWE twitter feeds, but I would assume that anything from people as high profile as Cena would be read by Vince before it was allowed to be posted.

We have to play it by ear though. I wouldnt expect Danielson to show up at Raw this week, just to keep the work going (if it is a work), and I wouldnt expect any mention of his name at all either. If we are being worked, then all I can say is Vince McMahon, congratulations
 
If the NXT invasion is continued, I think they have to at least mention it. Now, how they mention and for how long will go a long way towards deciding if this is real or a work.
 
I found this post highly insulting, and it's not even responding to me.


WOW! I've seen people twist words around on here, but I think you just totally shoved words in his mouth.

And seriously? He never said he was OKAY with children imitating acts of violence they witnessed in the WWE, but kids will be kids! Kids will punch each other, kick each other, throw things at each other, it's what they do. If you walked past a middle school yard and saw two kids punching each other you'd think, "Oh silly youth." If you walked past a middle school yard and saw some kid choking out another kid with a rope, I'm hoping you'd run over there and stop it, because while a punch can cause a bloody nose or a black eye, strangulation could cause, um... death.



Oh, so you'd be one of those pussy parents. I bet you won't let your kids play Grand Theft Auto too because it's too violent. God I hate pussy parents.



Some parents aren't fascists. Some parents believe they have taught their children right from wrong well enough that their children deserve to watch some entertaining television. Unfortunately, last Monday wasn't entertaining at all until the last 5 minutes of the show. None the less, I wouldn't be surprised if there were plenty of kids ages 10 and up who were tuned in for the end of RAW.



Not really. Like, while you COULD walk into a rap concert and start shouting derogatory comments about black people, but the consequences probably wouldn't be favorable. Have fun using your freedom of speech argument there.



That's called trolling, and you can get a warning for that. It's also just uncalled for and unwarranted. I hope you didn't hurt his feelings.



Your freedom of speech thing doesn't really help your case... but do go on.



It's also what is AWESOME about live TV. Live TV is actually one of the biggest selling points in media. Everyone wants to watch something unfold LIVE. That's why RAW is the LIVE flagship show, and Smackdown is prerecorded second-rate stuff, even though they try to give the illusion of being live. I don't really know what you're trying to say here... but if you're suggesting Danielson doesn't deserve to be fired because it's not his fault, but the fault of live TV, I have to say I disagree with you. After all, if Matt Lauer came into Good Morning America and strangled Meredith Viera, I guarantee you NBC wouldn't let him off with a slap on the wrists because it wasn't his fault he was doing it live.



What?



I whole heatedly agree with you. But, as it has been stated, this probably came from someone higher up. Maybe the WWE did some studies or something and found that parents were more worried about their kids imitating choke holds rather than wielding chairs, and Danielson needed to be made an example out of? Maybe the WWE wanted to show that they will take disciplinary action on anyone, regardless on status.



So wait, you grew up during a time when professional wrestling was at it's most risque? Yet you condemn today's product and state you wouldn't let your fictional children watch it? Whaaaat?



Oh, I didn't account for the fact that you were a much better person than children today. SORRY!



Good for you! (I don't get how this relates to Daniel Bryan but whatever, freedom of speech right?)



Hm, a Cena hater. What a surprise. Yet you idolize the Sandman? He's not exactly Shawn Michaels.



Pot, meet kettle. Kettle, pot. I think you'll get along famously.



A hilarious ending to a hilarious post. Don't worry, I won't accuse you of selling crack new poster, just of putting together a... well, not exactly a terrific post. Better luck next time, chum.

Okay you found my post insulting even though they guy i was posting it against called me a fucking drug dealer, wow just wow. Well he just put it that he would rather have his child give another child a piledriver, or an FU then an incorrect sleeper hold because The good Lord knows a kid can't put it on right. Okay so you will let your child who is like 5 or 6 years old play Grand Theft Auto, wow that just proves that you are a bad parent holy shit wow i am not a pussy parent, I will never but I will let my nephew, son, or daughter play that game until they know its fake and you can't do that in real life the fact that you would even say that just proves Your a dumbass. Yeah I grew up when it was for adults, and yes i wouldn't let my nephew, son, or daughter watch it the reason being is because I have a say in what they watch, My parents might have let me watch it but they made sure that I didn't copy those moves, I don't want to have that risk knowing that they might try those moves on any child. Call me whatever you want I don't care. Yeah because I still don't talk back to my parents, I don't twitter or tweet i have actual conversations with people, I don't disrecpect people like the children of today because I have respect for everybody until they lose my respect. I never said that the sandman was shawn Michaels, They are there own seperate people The Sandman is more violent, Shawn is the better wrestler next to the American Dragon. So i bid you a good farwell chum and I just got 2 words for you from the Orginal DX

SUCK IT
 
I don't know if this is legit or not. There are so many mixed signals coming from both camps its hard to tell.

That being said to those saying Cena's tweet confirms that it is a work no it doesn't. Does anyone remember how HBK used to lash out and go out to the ring and break kayfabe back in 97-98? He used to bash the WWF and mcmahon on TV. He used to break script with Bret Hart weekly in 97. That is not to even mention the times he would come out obviously under the influence when he wasn't wrestling.

I don't like Cena, but just like HBK in 97-98 Cena is the main man in WWE. He is the face of the company. If he decides to come out and speak out against the WWE they might not like it, but since he sells tickets/merchandise they would deal with it.

We won't know for sure until we see Raw tomorrow night.
 
I don't know if this is legit or not. There are so many mixed signals coming from both camps its hard to tell.

That being said to those saying Cena's tweet confirms that it is a work no it doesn't. Does anyone remember how HBK used to lash out and go out to the ring and break kayfabe back in 97-98? He used to bash the WWF and mcmahon on TV. He used to break script with Bret Hart weekly in 97. That is not to even mention the times he would come out obviously under the influence when he wasn't wrestling.

I don't like Cena, but just like HBK in 97-98 Cena is the main man in WWE. He is the face of the company. If he decides to come out and speak out against the WWE they might not like it, but since he sells tickets/merchandise they would deal with it.

We won't know for sure until we see Raw tomorrow night.

We might not know ANYTHING tomorrow, who knows maybe nothing is mentioned till the following monday, or maybe thats next weeks guest host or the following week lol idk. That's an idea, if otunga could do it, so can Danielson
 
Okay so you are saying that if a 7 year old boy does a piledriver on his 6 year old friend and causes, internal brain damage causing him to be on life support is better then a 7 year old putting an incorrect sleeperhold on the same 6 year old friend is better wow, remind never to leave any child with you.

Did I say that? No. I answered your comparison between a chair/door shot and choking somebody. Piledrivers are illegal in WWE too, except for The Undertaker. Way to take something out of context, twerp.

Well on the East coast little kids should be in bed at a ceartin time for school, now on the west coast little 5 year olds shouldn't be watching wrestling they should be watching spongebod or whatever fuckin cartoons are on, not prowrestling.

First you said 5-11 year olds, and now it's just 5 year olds. And admit it, you watched this as a kid too. So now we are to take it away from kids just because you grew up? Kids watch this show, and are the biggest market the WWE has. Face it, and get over it.

Also Vince should be mad at the who ever is running the camera for putting that on t.v. and showing it on the big screen because Danielson was doing his job and he was told to go ahead and put him in a camel clutch type move so the guy who aloud that on t.v. should have been fired not Danielson.

I'm sorry, did you read a document explaining who was to do what? I didn't think so. Never mind that the live crowd, with children, still saw it, but Danielson was chosen to be an example of for choking a guy, not the cameraman for filming it.

There is no reason to fire Danelson, that was only one offenese to Bryan it was a shame it was his Frist and only offense. When you are friends of some wrestlers in the bussiness you learn how backstage shit works but you wouldn't know that.

Keep that "I am/know an insider" attitude around here and see where it gets you. You're full of shit and you know it.

Now its time for your lesson in Wrestling History, ECW had a sex angle involving lesbians and they kissed eachother in the middle of the ring and was awesome..:) Sable showing her playboy cover was awesome and if you would go on youtube and watching a RAW segment called Sable in the Sack, yeah. You also had the Infamous Brian Pillmin XXX enough said on that. Sunny the original Diva comming down in barly anything almost every monday is a sexy thing. So I gave you a lot of shit that you happened to leave out. Also the May Young giving birth to a hand was just disturbing that fact that you brought that up just makes me what to ask you "What in the blue hell is wrong with you, people are trying to forget that".

First of all, ECW at that time was not WWE. And most of that other shit you cite is just that: shit. It was an easy way WWE found to get nerdy little virgins to fork over time and attention, and it worked, for a time. When you want to talk about wrestling, come back, but otherwise none of that stuff made WWE the better product in that era; it was the booking, and the stars not tied into that kind of bullshit. When I poked fun at you for liking the Attitude Era, it was because I knew you loved that kind of shit and were ignorant as to what made that time truly great.

And theres the suprised Your a stoner that was a real shocker I did not know that given the fact that you are most likey high right now and have nothing better to do then have something to eat and sit by your computer. Also I don't give a flying fuck how drug money is made I have nothing to do with that shit and I will never have anything to do with that shit.

That's cool. Of all the things in my first post, inadvertently calling you a drug dealer was not intentional, and so I'll apologize for that. But seriously, this high (and drunk) stoner is still schooling you.
 
Okay you found my post insulting even though they guy i was posting it against called me a fucking drug dealer, wow just wow.

He was insinuating that only someone who is low enough to sell crack would share the same opinion as you. Don't be dense brosuph.

Well he just put it that he would rather have his child give another child a piledriver, or an FU then an incorrect sleeper hold because The good Lord knows a kid can't put it on right.

No... YOU said that about him. He never even mentioned the word piledriver. He never even said anything about body slams, did he? Nope, just checked, he didn't. Seems like Randy Orton isn't the only one hearing voices.

Okay so you will let your child who is like 5 or 6 years old play Grand Theft Auto, wow that just proves that you are a bad parent holy shit wow i am not a pussy parent

Actually, studies have shown that children who play violent video games are LESS likely to commit acts of violence. Clearly, if your son or daughter has violent tendencies, you should keep them away from games like Grand Theft Auto or programming like the WWE, but if you have a well rounded kid, I don't think there's any harm in it.

I will never but I will let my nephew, son, or daughter play that game until they know its fake and you can't do that in real life the fact that you would even say that just proves Your a dumbass.

Says the man who can't properly use a period, and the man who doesn't know the difference between your and you're.

Yeah I grew up when it was for adults, and yes i wouldn't let my nephew, son, or daughter watch it the reason being is because I have a say in what they watch, My parents might have let me watch it but they made sure that I didn't copy those moves,

So if your kids did watch it, you wouldn't stop them from copying the moves? Why can't you let them watch it and teach them not to copy the moves like your parents did?

I don't want to have that risk knowing that they might try those moves on any child. Call me whatever you want I don't care. Yeah because I still don't talk back to my parents, I don't twitter or tweet i have actual conversations with people,

Once again... what?

I don't disrecpect people like the children of today because I have respect for everybody until they lose my respect.

I'm sure your respect is highly coveted by children and adults alike... but making a broad sweeping statement by saying all children of today are disrespectful is just ludicrous.


I never said that the sandman was shawn Michaels, They are there own seperate people The Sandman is more violent, Shawn is the better wrestler next to the American Dragon.

If I remember correctly, I said that in response to you saying you want to watch wrestlers like Danielson, like the ones you grew up with (Tommy Dreamer, Raven, and SANDMAN). Sandman was shit in the ring. He had an awesome entrance, and it was fun to watch him hit people with stuff, but other than that, he had shit to offer.

So i bid you a good farwell chum and I just got 2 words for you from the Orginal DX

SUCK IT

Ouch, my feelings.

By the way, to stay remotely on topic. More and more of me is beginning to believe this is a work, though I'm still not sold either way. The attention this thing is getting inside of and outside of the WWE just seems like too much for it to be real.
 
Did I say that? No. I answered your comparison between a chair/door shot and choking somebody. Piledrivers are illegal in WWE too, except for The Undertaker. Way to take something out of context, twerp.



First you said 5-11 year olds, and now it's just 5 year olds. And admit it, you watched this as a kid too. So now we are to take it away from kids just because you grew up? Kids watch this show, and are the biggest market the WWE has. Face it, and get over it.



I'm sorry, did you read a document explaining who was to do what? I didn't think so. Never mind that the live crowd, with children, still saw it, but Danielson was chosen to be an example of for choking a guy, not the cameraman for filming it.



Keep that "I am/know an insider" attitude around here and see where it gets you. You're full of shit and you know it.



First of all, ECW at that time was not WWE. And most of that other shit you cite is just that: shit. It was an easy way WWE found to get nerdy little virgins to fork over time and attention, and it worked, for a time. When you want to talk about wrestling, come back, but otherwise none of that stuff made WWE the better product in that era; it was the booking, and the stars not tied into that kind of bullshit. When I poked fun at you for liking the Attitude Era, it was because I knew you loved that kind of shit and were ignorant as to what made that time truly great.



That's cool. Of all the things in my first post, inadvertently calling you a drug dealer was not intentional, and so I'll apologize for that. But seriously, this high (and drunk) stoner is still schooling you.

Well I thought you said that anything but a choke hold was okay and you would let your childrent do that, well thats my bad okay a 7 year old hits his 6 year old friend with a steel chair, puts him in the hostpital with brain damage thats better then an incorrect sleeperhold again wow just wow I think we have a parent of year right here. Also piledrivers aren't illegal if you recall one of the house shows, Jerry Lawler vs. Edge, Edge won but Lawler hit him with a piledriver so they can't be illegal if Jerrry is still doing them. Also your argurement about the Tombstone Piledriver is bullshit because it isn't really a piledriver because Taker has complete control, Look at TNA's eric young's piledriver, thats a real piledriver (I know its the WWE thread i am just using it as an example). Yeah I did watch it as a kid but that was the when i was 5 it was the ending of the Orginal PG era with Hulk Hogan and Bret Hart, I was 5 in 1995 yeah, also Austin got big in around 1998/1999 when i was old enough to realize that it was fake and i wasn't going to do it, because it would have ended there with wrestling because my parents were smart enough to make me stop if I started copying there moves. I am not talking about the cameraman fliming the choking out of Justin Roberts, I am talking about the guy in the production truck that aloud it to be on national t.v. If it wasn't on t.v. it wouldn't have gotten Bryan in all this shit, so the guy in charge of the production truck should be at fault not Danelson for doing his job. I know ECW wasn't WWF at the time i am not stupid I know that they were seperate companies. WWF was doing some of the shit ECW was doing at a lower level and I say again copying the Miz it was AWESOME t.v. I belive we are talking about wrestling I just wish not to talk about SUPERCENA I WOULD RATHER TALK ABOUT THE AMERICAN DRAGON Bryan Danielson who doesn't do 5 moves. I really don't think your schooling me in anything I am the Guru of wrestling I know everything about this bussiness, this bussiness is in my blood not yours, you are just some junkie who has nothing better to do then rip on other peoples post and i feel sorry for you
 
He was insinuating that only someone who is low enough to sell crack would share the same opinion as you. Don't be dense brosuph.



No... YOU said that about him. He never even mentioned the word piledriver. He never even said anything about body slams, did he? Nope, just checked, he didn't. Seems like Randy Orton isn't the only one hearing voices.



Actually, studies have shown that children who play violent video games are LESS likely to commit acts of violence. Clearly, if your son or daughter has violent tendencies, you should keep them away from games like Grand Theft Auto or programming like the WWE, but if you have a well rounded kid, I don't think there's any harm in it.



Says the man who can't properly use a period, and the man who doesn't know the difference between your and you're.



So if your kids did watch it, you wouldn't stop them from copying the moves? Why can't you let them watch it and teach them not to copy the moves like your parents did?



Once again... what?



I'm sure your respect is highly coveted by children and adults alike... but making a broad sweeping statement by saying all children of today are disrespectful is just ludicrous.




If I remember correctly, I said that in response to you saying you want to watch wrestlers like Danielson, like the ones you grew up with (Tommy Dreamer, Raven, and SANDMAN). Sandman was shit in the ring. He had an awesome entrance, and it was fun to watch him hit people with stuff, but other than that, he had shit to offer.



Ouch, my feelings.

By the way, to stay remotely on topic. More and more of me is beginning to believe this is a work, though I'm still not sold either way. The attention this thing is getting inside of and outside of the WWE just seems like too much for it to be real.

I don't think he said that, I believe he said that I sold crack and that was it, Either way he basicly said that anything but a chokehold was okay hell if he okay with a kid hittin another kid with a steel chair then he should be fine with the body slams and piledrivers and the FU's. Also I don't hear voices in my head, I am not crazy. I would like to see the studies you have said because that is just pure bullshit, I have read that studies show that kids are more likey to commit those crimes on Grand Theft Auto. When my child is 11 sure i will tell them the difference between tv and real life but i will not let that same child who is 5-10 go any where WWE or TNA programming I don't care what you think of me thats how i feel, because a kids don't listen to there parents half the time. Now I will expline it so you can understand it, if my 5 year old were to watch wrestling without my knowing and copy those moves and hurt another child and he dies, that blood would be on me, that childs death would be on my soul because i wouldn't have taken the time to make sure my kid wasn't watching a ceartin show because i don't believe in those stupid channel blockers because the real channel blockers are the parents. Children today don't know what respect means they are more concern on there phones, or the internet I learned respect and I give people my respect until they lose my respect. Sandman wasn't shit in the ring, sure he was a drunk and i will admit that but he wasn't shit Hell the 3 way bout he had a Barely legal with Terry Funk and Stevie was a 4 star match. Tommy Dreamer is an awesome wrestler, Terry Fuck, Mick Foley, Chris Benoit, Eddie Guerrero, Rey Mysterio, Stone Cold Steve Austin, and countless others are hands down better then over 90% of the WWE's current roster.
 
okay, instead of reading all these stupids posts/battles I have actually something to say about the topic and I want to read yours opinions about it:

what IF, the release of Danielson Bryan is real and yet the E is playing mind games (so to speak). I mean Danielson Bryan is fired by the WWE (for whatever reason) and because it has generate so much buzz on the interweb (lol gotta love Tracy Jordan!), the E is taking benefit about this by developing into a storyline?? I mean 54 pages (well more like 51 cause the last ones are OFF TOPIC) about the release of a wrestler is crazy!!! if I was the E I would benefit in what better way than making everyone guess and therefore making everyone tune tomorrow night RAW!? thoughts?? and please stay on topic!!!
 
Doesn't Cena's tweets and his rally to get Bryan Danielson back in WWE sound a lot like what people reported was going to happen in the Hardy/Drew storyline? Where Drew was going to get "fired" and then Matt was going to have a viral campaign to get him back, so he could face him in the ring? :S I'm not saying it's all part of an angle, maybe its a total coincidence but whoa so very similar!
 
We might not know ANYTHING tomorrow, who knows maybe nothing is mentioned till the following monday, or maybe thats next weeks guest host or the following week lol idk. That's an idea, if otunga could do it, so can Danielson

Never thought about that, it would fit right in though. The NXT rookies and BD could wreak all sorts of havoc because they have the power to do so (both physically and contractually). I would love to see someone announce this tomorrow night, can't wait actually :).

@ Fallen Angel 21 3, JGlass14, & DirtyJose: I implore you all to check this awesome link out: http://forums.wrestlezone.com/announcement.php?f=17 -- I've noticed quite a few offenses you guys have racked up, so it might be wise if you all cease what you're doing and just stick to the topic at hand, rather than making yourself look like assclowns for posting stupid shit on this thread. There's no need for it. This is about Daniel Bryan's release, the reason, speculation, etc. This isn't about raising kids, selling crack, "good" wrestlers, or whatever. Just stick to the main topic and stop causing all this e-drama. It's annoying.
 
Doesn't Cena's tweets and his rally to get Bryan Danielson back in WWE sound a lot like what people reported was going to happen in the Hardy/Drew storyline? Where Drew was going to get "fired" and then Matt was going to have a viral campaign to get him back, so he could face him in the ring? :S I'm not saying it's all part of an angle, maybe its a total coincidence but whoa so very similar!

Yeah, I mentioned something about that a few posts ago but some kids want to go off-topic and ruin the thread for others. I don't know what happened to that angle or anything, the only sketchy thing Matt has done is ask if he should stay in WWE or not. Obviously the E has been wanting to incorporate Twitter with some of their storylines, and I'm thinking the NXT Invasion angle and John Cena's tweets tie perfectly together. Not only are they attracting the attention of casual fans who watch RAW on TV, they are attracting the attention of Twitter followers (Cena has about 50k last time I checked), the ENTIRE IWC (everyone is wondering about this, well, except for the 3 idiots who keep stirring up the drama on this thread), and the fans who don't really approve of PGWWE. It's the perfect blend, like a Oreo milkshake. Speaking of which, I'll be right back...

Edit: I meant to edit my previous post (#541) and add this to that post, if a mod would mind merging the two posts I'd appreciate it. If not, it's fine, doesn't really matter. :p)
 
Guys, just because he commented on Bryan being released, doesn't mean it's a sign that it's a work. Cena commented on Carlito's release and said he was underutilized and had great potential. Is Carlito back? Nope. Sorry to burst any bubbles. I really hope this is a work though.
 
Guys, just because he commented on Bryan being released, doesn't mean it's a sign that it's a work. Cena commented on Carlito's release and said he was underutilized and had great potential. Is Carlito back? Nope. Sorry to burst any bubbles. I really hope this is a work though.

While this is a good point, I think the big deal about Cena commenting on Danielson's release is that we're not sure if this is real or scripted, whereas nobody questioned Carlito's release. But you are right, Cena's commenting on the release may be a moot point as he has been known to speak about other former co-workers.
 
Guys, just because he commented on Bryan being released, doesn't mean it's a sign that it's a work. Cena commented on Carlito's release and said he was underutilized and had great potential. Is Carlito back? Nope. Sorry to burst any bubbles. I really hope this is a work though.

But he hasn't recently been involved with Carlito. What makes this unique and kind of interesting is that Daniel Bryan kicked his ass, spat in his face, and told him he wasn't better than him. Then, Cena, in his usual face character, asks the fans for the petition so they can get Daniel Bryan back. He didn't do that for Carlito, you see? The given circumstances just make this really seem like a work to me.
 
What about bryan dainelsons tweet? Biding time for the right moment to speak about it? Sorry this seems more and more like a work to me, if I just got fired due to a backstage political move i would imagine I would be pissed off enough to at least ackowledge that the incident was real, not give cryptic messages to keep people guessing. Also cena seems much more in charcter then his tweets about carlito, the whole thing just seems set up to me.
 
Okay You know I am only gonna hit a few key points, and this is it I am tired you two assclowns pissing me off

Ah, parting is such sweet sorrow. Emphasis on the sweet.

1. 5 years can copy pro wrestling moves okay and if my kid saw it without my knowing and hurt somebody how can i expline to him before he does it also you say a 5 year old can't lift people up it only takes 2 seconds to have put sombody in a pile driver hold or a stone cold stunner and have then hurt.

In addition to not having the physical capabilities to perform wrestling moves, I don't think most 5 year olds have the mental capability to perform wrestling moves. They can't even read yet, and you expect them to mimic what they see on 3 seconds of television? Also, this has nothing to do with Daniel Bryan.

2. Of course I am gonna expline to my kid before he's 11 that theres no talking sponge or elmo isn't real because he will figure that out on his own, i ment that wrestling is fake and u need to be trained to do it

I think your kid should be smart enough to figure that out himself. Once again, this has nothing to do with Bryan Danielson.

3. Okay sure you study proved that about i am going to say 70% of kids aren't violent even though they play grand theft auto i have an arugement about the 30% you don't believe me all i have to say is remember Callembine (if i spelled that wrong i am sorry but it was the school shooting that happened in the 90's)about those 2 kids that were about 11 or 12 and shot up there school because of a violent game thats it.

Those kids were in high school. They were angry, misguided youth who were constantly being humiliated by their classmates. What they did was not because of video games, but because of gun culture in the United States and years of abuse. To insinuate that such a tragedy happened as a result of a video game is an insult to both the victims of the Comumbine shootings as well as the families affected by it. Oh, and this has nothing to do with Daniel Bryan. I'm starting to see a pattern.

4. If you would have taken the time to read my original post that was before the other assclown pissed me off it was on point and you had to get involed of a A and B thing so i would like you to C your way out of it

Huh? What does this have to do with Bryan Danielson?

5. In the Land of extreme hardly nobody had a off night all there matches were awesome.

THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING.

I believe your original point was that Daniel Bryan should not have been fired because of a choke when most wrestlers get away with so much worse. That is a valid argument, but the counter argument is also valid, in that a choke his a very dangerous thing, and it wouldn't be very surprising if the WWE were trying to cut down on choking moves. The choking with the tie was malicious, and while it made for great TV, it should not be emulated at home, which is something the WWE has struggled to deal with, and therefore it makes sense the they would cut out the choke hold.

I agree with you that if this is the reason Danielson was fired, it's not fair and it's an irrational response to the incident, but I can still see the logic in it.
 
amazing. it was there 5 minutes ago and i'm sure other people here must have seen it. it's been replaced by the viewer's choice thing. odd timing.
 
hey i think that daniel bryans release is real now because i just saw that jtg even tweeted about it he said "B4 I go to bed I wanna give a shout out to NXT star brian danielson.One of the most talented workers in the biz,hope to see you back brother " i just thought that jtg would be a random guy for wwe to choose to further an angle
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top