I found this post highly insulting, and it's not even responding to me.
WOW! I've seen people twist words around on here, but I think you just totally shoved words in his mouth.
And seriously? He never said he was OKAY with children imitating acts of violence they witnessed in the WWE, but kids will be kids! Kids will punch each other, kick each other, throw things at each other, it's what they do. If you walked past a middle school yard and saw two kids punching each other you'd think, "Oh silly youth." If you walked past a middle school yard and saw some kid choking out another kid with a rope, I'm hoping you'd run over there and stop it, because while a punch can cause a bloody nose or a black eye, strangulation could cause, um... death.
Oh, so you'd be one of those pussy parents. I bet you won't let your kids play Grand Theft Auto too because it's too violent. God I hate pussy parents.
Some parents aren't fascists. Some parents believe they have taught their children right from wrong well enough that their children deserve to watch some entertaining television. Unfortunately, last Monday wasn't entertaining at all until the last 5 minutes of the show. None the less, I wouldn't be surprised if there were plenty of kids ages 10 and up who were tuned in for the end of RAW.
Not really. Like, while you COULD walk into a rap concert and start shouting derogatory comments about black people, but the consequences probably wouldn't be favorable. Have fun using your freedom of speech argument there.
That's called trolling, and you can get a warning for that. It's also just uncalled for and unwarranted. I hope you didn't hurt his feelings.
Your freedom of speech thing doesn't really help your case... but do go on.
It's also what is AWESOME about live TV. Live TV is actually one of the biggest selling points in media. Everyone wants to watch something unfold LIVE. That's why RAW is the LIVE flagship show, and Smackdown is prerecorded second-rate stuff, even though they try to give the illusion of being live. I don't really know what you're trying to say here... but if you're suggesting Danielson doesn't deserve to be fired because it's not his fault, but the fault of live TV, I have to say I disagree with you. After all, if Matt Lauer came into Good Morning America and strangled Meredith Viera, I guarantee you NBC wouldn't let him off with a slap on the wrists because it wasn't his fault he was doing it live.
What?
I whole heatedly agree with you. But, as it has been stated, this probably came from someone higher up. Maybe the WWE did some studies or something and found that parents were more worried about their kids imitating choke holds rather than wielding chairs, and Danielson needed to be made an example out of? Maybe the WWE wanted to show that they will take disciplinary action on anyone, regardless on status.
So wait, you grew up during a time when professional wrestling was at it's most risque? Yet you condemn today's product and state you wouldn't let your fictional children watch it? Whaaaat?
Oh, I didn't account for the fact that you were a much better person than children today. SORRY!
Good for you! (I don't get how this relates to Daniel Bryan but whatever, freedom of speech right?)
Hm, a Cena hater. What a surprise. Yet you idolize the Sandman? He's not exactly Shawn Michaels.
Pot, meet kettle. Kettle, pot. I think you'll get along famously.
A hilarious ending to a hilarious post. Don't worry, I won't accuse you of selling crack new poster, just of putting together a... well, not exactly a terrific post. Better luck next time, chum.