Now, the explanation. Yes, they are copying the Jeff Hardy thing. Saying they're not is like saying 3.3.11 promo was an original idea, totally not a shot.
Anyone who thinks this was not a copy is well - pretty stupid to say the least (yes, I'm name calling, stop being so soft and grow a spine).
They did copy TNA.
Mr. Zevon! My favorite guy! You know why I love this guy? He speaks with such PASSION, such CONVICTION! When he speaks, brother you gotta listen!
So when Mr. Zevon Zion proclaims that WWE copied TNA you KNOW that he was there when WWE writers were putting together Raw for this Monday. He was there in the meeting with Vince, Brien Gerwitz and the rest, eating potato chips, sipping a beer and watching old Impact tapes. That's when one of the writers proclaimed "wow! Jeff Hardy smoked a cigarette on a TNA Pay Per View! That was awesome and brought in so many viewers, we should totally do that!"
Yes, there was backlash. Some felt it was distasteful and some weren't sure which brand of cigarette to push. Hell, some knew the English law that states that indoor smoking is illegal in the country. But there was Zevon Zion, reassuring the writers that it was a good idea because it will work. What a guy!
Keep in mind, before it went to print and was sent to the wrestlers, someone spouted out "hey, is it cool that we're copying TNA, a company that prays every night to be even half as successful as we are?" which was replied to "sure, most of our audience won't have seen TNA so they won't know it's a copy. Hell, most of TNA's audience didn't see it either since it was on Pay Per View!" "Well ok, let's do it then!"
I'm so glad the Zevon was there to let us know with 100 percent conviction that WWE's intent with having smoking and conditioning play into a storyline was absolutely, positively, 100% a lifted idea from Jeff Hardy smoking a cigarette on the way to the ring to face Mr. Anderson. We could have argued for hours wondering but it's great to have an insider!
Are we getting it yet? They are very different stories and in both cases, much like smoke has been used in the past, the usage of it was done to push a character. The thing is, Jeff's case and Truth's case are very, very different. I personally am not a fan of using it in either case as it has very personal meaning to me (I posted an article about this last night on my site), but to suggest that they were done for the same reason and that the idea was lifted is pretty silly. Only to the internet fan would something this small come off as a "copied idea". A story wasn't copied, a scene wasn't copied, and a character wasn't copied. It's a foreign object that was used to further a storyline. I suppose that any time someone uses a chair it's being ripped off right?
Listen, I didn't like it when TNA did it and I didn't like it when Truth did it either. Again, it's a personal thing for me but I stand by feeling that way. That said, I highly doubt that using a foreign object to further a story is a copied idea and I certainly would never proclaim it to be with such conviction in saying "yes, they copied them". In saying that, you are trying to further the idea that WWE is watching TNA intently and looking to rip them off or something. Despite what Hogan might tell you on Twitter, that's simply not the case.