So first WWE brings in Nash/Booker and squashes the MEM rumored comeback.
Then WWE goes the Jersey Shore route and picks up Snooki for Mania.
Now they completely rip off the Jeff Hardy Cigarette move - which correct me if I'm wrong - got a lot of heat for being classless to get over R-Truth as a heel.
It amazes me for a company that denies it looks at TNA as competition that they so blatantly have used gimmicks used by TNA to get over their stars of build events. It seems to me WWE looks at TNA for cues on how to be creative. Yet everyone bashes Russo/Hogan/Bischoff for lack of creative.
Thoughts on the theft that has taken place in the wrestling world?
Before I offer my thoughts on the issue, I'd first like to make a few observations on the actual product we're seeing from both companies of late.
For TNA I do believe they've improved their product with the Immortal v. Fourtune storyline and I also like the Anderson v. RVD v Sting storyline even though I'm not a huge fan of RVD. I do think they need to get the Angle/Jarrett v. Angle storyline and should just treat it now as a bitter feud between Jarrett and Angle and get rid of Karen. Most of the rest of what they're doing is highly questionable as to its purpose or value to the end product.
In WWE I think they did what they needed to do by bringing in SCSA and The Rock to promote the heck out of WM, but it shows how weak their top talent is to the consumer or at least how weak those at the corporate offices of WWE believe their top talent to be. I still believe that The Miz as the new heel/face of WWE is a mistake UNLESS they turn him face. He's just not believable as a heel character and feel his cause would be better served as (which it's too late to do now) as the 'little engine that could' type of face climbing the mountain to success. On top of that they set their main event for the next WM a year in advance? What? So much for THAT storyline being developed. I get it may be a different way of approaching HOW to tell a story, but I'm just not sure how they are going to make this work when fans know that both Cena and Rock will be off from time to time to work on other projects. All that said, I do believe that WWE has a much deeper bench to draw from than does TNA and that depth gives them a lot more variety in how to write storylines and whom to use in them. They, like a MLB team, have a farm system to draw from and to develop new talent, but TNA seems to be culling from indy stars, or from WWE cast-offs who have had issues either with management or personal characters issues.
Sorry about that length of my observations but felt it was important to draw some distinct differences between the 2 companies in order to comment on the actual subject of the thread, which I'll do now.
I for one have to believe that the WWE is on at least its 3rd or 4th go around on certain storylines or character development over the last decade of decade and a half. For years they've been using Hollywood personalities and/or sports personalities as part of their WM shows. Quite often they've brought in infamous stars who were in the news that year or more recently as part of the build up to WM. Muhammad Ali, Pete Rose, Drew Carey, Liberace, Cyndi Lauper, and on and on are just some of the names I recall. Heck, some of those events happened before most had even heard of TNA. So I think the author is historically inaccurate in that sense.
As to storylines let's remember it is WWE we're talking about here. WWE of the attitude era where nearly anything was game. We had non-wrestling valets appear on network television nearly nude (remember Sable?) and sometimes even well-respected performers like Trish Stratus who were seen more at the time as eye candy than serious wrestlers which helped attention to the WWE product. We had a Pimp character, a former porn star character (who by the way allegedly had his privates hacked off.), an angry beer-swilling redneck who literally gave the world the finger and was seen as a hero for it, a demonic character who literally crucified (mock obviously) his victims/enemies on his version of a cross/crucifix, an over-the-top female fan who had a lesbian crush on Trish Stratus (Mickie James: who by the way turned out to have done some actual risque/nude photos in her real life), and the list goes on and on and on. Point is, most of what we see on tv today, whether in TNA or WWE has probably been done, and probably more than once by WWE over the years just based on their longevity.
In the end, both companies could improve a lot with the right character development and the right storylines. However, I think TNA has a far longer road to improve to the point of being an actual threat to WWE than does WWE to remain ahead of TNA.