Complain in Here

[Burngun]

OK, I've only been here for about 2 weeks but I've already received 2 warnings. 1st one was abit harsh but I could maybe understand it, but I've just received a 2nd warning for this post:

For Russo, it's all about the ratings and publicity. If anyone has seen the interview he did with Mike Tenay about WCW, he said that the only reason he made Arquette WCW Champion was because it would get in the national newspapers (which it did).

I really don't understand wrestling writers sometimes.

Now, I don't see how this is ''spam''. I made a valid point of Russo making Arquette WCW champion for the publicity, and mentioned an interview he did which said why he did it. I contributed to the thread imo and don't understand the infraction.

Please explain.

 

[Luther_Hull]

OK, I've only been here for about 2 weeks but I've already received 2 warnings. 1st one was abit harsh but I could maybe understand it, but I've just received a 2nd warning for this post:



Now, I don't see how this is ''spam''. I made a valid point of Russo making Arquette WCW champion for the publicity, and mentioned an interview he did which said why he did it. I contributed to the thread imo and don't understand the infraction.

Please explain.

That wasn't spam.


This was:

I think Gail Kim vs. Ariel in a lingerie pillow fight for the Knockout's title would be much more interesting to watch tbh.

Which is what you received the infraction for.