Come Be Entertained By Crocky's Tall Tales
- Thread starter Crocker
- Start date
- Status
BestSportsEntertainer
I Don't Need No User Title
It almost comical that you're this oblivious to the situation.
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
Actually it wasn't as Bryan had already had his moment and had far less stable health. That's far from the same thing.
No. You're supposed to come up with your own opinion instead of just nodding along with what they say because it was a "real life interview." Something you'll learn in life is that not everything is black and white. Sometimes people lie to advance their agenda, whatever that may be.
BestSportsEntertainer
I Don't Need No User Title
I'll state my case one last time.
-- WWE has a history of not wanting to push wrestler similar to someone with the size of Daniel Bryan. It's no coincidence that the three biggest pro wrestlers of all time are (arguably) Hulk Hogan (6-7, 302), Stone Cold (6-2, 252), and John Cena (6-1, 251). That's an average height of 6-3 and weight of 268 pounds. Therefore Daniel Bryan (5-10, 210) does not have the conventional size that Vince wants out of the face of the company and WM headliner. This is all facts.
-- Daniel Bryan, Sheamus, and CM Punk have all confirmed that WWE specifically wanted Batista vs. Randy Orton and Daniel Bryan vs. Sheamus for WM30.
-- Daniel Bryan wasn't in the Royal Rumble that was won by Batista, who had just got done filming "Guardians of the Galaxy" and returned.
If you can't see it and think it's a work, then I feel sorry for you.
-- WWE has a history of not wanting to push wrestler similar to someone with the size of Daniel Bryan. It's no coincidence that the three biggest pro wrestlers of all time are (arguably) Hulk Hogan (6-7, 302), Stone Cold (6-2, 252), and John Cena (6-1, 251). That's an average height of 6-3 and weight of 268 pounds. Therefore Daniel Bryan (5-10, 210) does not have the conventional size that Vince wants out of the face of the company and WM headliner. This is all facts.
-- Daniel Bryan, Sheamus, and CM Punk have all confirmed that WWE specifically wanted Batista vs. Randy Orton and Daniel Bryan vs. Sheamus for WM30.
-- Daniel Bryan wasn't in the Royal Rumble that was won by Batista, who had just got done filming "Guardians of the Galaxy" and returned.
If you can't see it and think it's a work, then I feel sorry for you.
BestSportsEntertainer
I Don't Need No User Title
I'm supposed to think everyone is lying and form my own "beliefs" and speculate on how things actually work? Great advice.
John McCass
You talkin' to me?
Ok. Enough of this. I'm revealing the truth now.
We're not WWE apologists. We are the WWE's creative team. And, why would we complain about our own storylines?
We're not WWE apologists. We are the WWE's creative team. And, why would we complain about our own storylines?
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
1. That's REALLY simplifying things and looking at data from a very different time. Things have changed a bit but we'll go with it.
1a. Also those aren't facts. Heights and weights have been rigged in wrestling for years. Hogan is roughly 6'5 or so.
2. They're confirming a story which may or may not be true. The assumption you're making is that they're telling the truth, which may not be the case.
3. No idea what point you're trying to make there but I have a feeling it's wrong.
I'm supposed to think everyone is lying and form my own "beliefs" and speculate on how things actually work? Great advice.
No. You're supposed to consider what people say and if something doesn't fit, think about it. Most of these things aren't worth arguing about, but this isn't exactly a normal place.
Because (pick one):
A) Because they know you'd believe them if they told you that your own shit was edible
B) Because they are a part of the professional community, and you're just a smark with money;
C) Shits and giggles;
D) Because the biggest sin in professional wrestling is telling the truth to the fans (Google "Chris Chetti");
E) Because professional wrestlers have their own individual agendas to push;
F) All of the above
A) Because they know you'd believe them if they told you that your own shit was edible
B) Because they are a part of the professional community, and you're just a smark with money;
C) Shits and giggles;
D) Because the biggest sin in professional wrestling is telling the truth to the fans (Google "Chris Chetti");
E) Because professional wrestlers have their own individual agendas to push;
F) All of the above
klunderbunker
Welcome to My (And Not Sly's) House
As I've said a few times already:
Maybe they weren't let in on what was going on and are saying what they believe is the truth. That's not lying. It's saying something they believe to be the truth but is really inaccurate.
Spidey Revivey
Porn is okay here long as it ain't dudes.
Still waiting on a writer to confirm Crocker/BSE's source instead of people that get paid to act.
Really this is the most absurd argument.
Let me put forth a couple of questions to everyone involved?
Do any of you work for the WWE and were privy to the plans for Wrestlemania 30?
What reliable sources do you have for your statements that either it was a work to include Daniel Bryan all along? Or where is the proof that it wasn't, and the match was to be Batista/Orton?
If none of you work for the WWE, then all of you are going on supposition. You have seen what happened and based on what a few wrestler's have said, which may be true or not, and based your decision on that.
Since none of us know for sure or until Vince McMahon or HHH comes out and tells everyone exactly what happened, then it will always be like this. Some will always believe that Bryan was included at the last minute, and some will always believe he was part of the plan all along.
What it all boils down to is who gives a shit, the event is almost two years old, and we're still arguing today about it. Now everyone go to your corners and play nice.
Let me put forth a couple of questions to everyone involved?
Do any of you work for the WWE and were privy to the plans for Wrestlemania 30?
What reliable sources do you have for your statements that either it was a work to include Daniel Bryan all along? Or where is the proof that it wasn't, and the match was to be Batista/Orton?
If none of you work for the WWE, then all of you are going on supposition. You have seen what happened and based on what a few wrestler's have said, which may be true or not, and based your decision on that.
Since none of us know for sure or until Vince McMahon or HHH comes out and tells everyone exactly what happened, then it will always be like this. Some will always believe that Bryan was included at the last minute, and some will always believe he was part of the plan all along.
What it all boils down to is who gives a shit, the event is almost two years old, and we're still arguing today about it. Now everyone go to your corners and play nice.
Coming from someone who thinks concussions are no big deal..
Fire Marshall Bill
Let me show ya somethin!!!
This sums up one, and I do mean only one, of the biggest flaws in their arguments. It's the epitome of double standards that exist in the "I like this guy but not this guy" arguments that infest wrestling forums.
BestSportsEntertainer
I Don't Need No User Title
People don't stay in character outside the ring.
Do you think Bray Wyatt goes around asking people to follow the buzzards?
BestSportsEntertainer
I Don't Need No User Title
I was just trying to be optimistic about Daniel Bryan's return, since he's my favorite wrestler.
BestSportsEntertainer
I Don't Need No User Title
1 - Vince still doesn't want smaller wrestlers like Daniel Bryan to be in the main event of WrestleMania.
2 - You think Daniel Bryan, CM Punk, and Sheamus are all lying. That's called speculation.
3 - I was just proving that WWE wanted Batista in the main event of WrestleMania.
Spidey Revivey
Porn is okay here long as it ain't dudes.
So what you're saying is no writer or employee except actors have come forward. Alrighty.
BestSportsEntertainer
I Don't Need No User Title
I'm saying that I trust Daniel Bryan over your speculation.
Fire Marshall Bill
Let me show ya somethin!!!
Only Nikki Bella, VKM, BAtista, Randy Orton...who else don't I like?...Eva Marie lie. Everyone else is a saint. Well, unless I decide I don't like them. Then they lie. Always.
Spidey Revivey
Porn is okay here long as it ain't dudes.
You are more than welcome to believe an underdog character when he says underdog things.
As I already said, I'll reserve judgment until a writer speaks up. Someone who actually knows the complete story and won't stand on bias. Until then it's fun to speculate...something everyone is doing.
Spidey Revivey
Porn is okay here long as it ain't dudes.
It's funny that the people we like also happen to be the only good, honest people who tell us what's really going on.
- Status
Similar threads
