Hell yah !
you guys didn't got it correctly!
the fact is that there can be two possible things regarding this.
1. Punk surely leaving WWE-
when wwe gave the chance to become the no. 1 Condenteder for WWE title. Punk officialy declared that he is leaving WWE. Again note Punk was perhaps the most underrated man in the company and obviouly he hated the PG stuff and was furious after Heyman was forced to leave WWE.
punk had all these thinks in mind and so, he took the oppurtunity to say to universe about how he feels. Note...Punk might have got the confidence to say these things because Batista just somedays ago complained about WWE becoming a crap of PG where there is no wrestling.
Even remember that Micheal Cole announced that Punk has been suspended from wwe for infinite time.
or
2. PG Era coming to a END.
At last perhaps after Linda McMohan lost in the elections. Vince realized that PG is not going to make any thing for Linda.
And so he is going to bring the PG era to an end slowly through an invasion angle of Heyman Army that will consist of Punk, returning Brock Lesner, and many more Heyman guys.
according to me if this happens It will surely make vince a billionare. Ok, so just wait untill the shadow is removed from the darkness.
I beg to differ on both points, and I'm going to give three main arguments against each of your two points.
Several people have already theorized that Punk is not leaving, and with good reason. The situation seems a little contrived, don't you think? Why give a push to someone who's leaving as you push them? It just doesn't make sense. I admit I was skeptical of the possibility of Punk re-signing too, so I know why you think he's going, but look at the facts (admittedly #3 is more a matter of perception, so take it or leave it):
1) Punk is getting pushed properly to main event and feud over the title for the first time in ages.
2) He's being allowed to cut loose and firmly establish his character, because it's caught on.
3) Compare crowd reactions to Punk, to those of Miz, R-Truth and del Rio, the other big heels on Raw. Punk is clearly the most over.
Also, Punk just got a chance to cut the promo many would 'kill' to cut. It was almost a shoot, and I'm sure much of it was connected to real feelings.
Now, as for PG ending (and by the way, Linda losing that election was quite some time ago now, no-one's really using that in their arguments any more):
1) Look at the audience demographics. More kids, more families. And it'll grow. Listen to Batista all you like, I'm not going to miss him. It doesn't kill or weaken the product, it just means heels have to be more inventive than resorting to swearing.
2) The product has already loosened the PG boundaries anyway, and it was Cena and the Rock who were doing that before Punk was, even though Punk has always spoken his mind to a greater or lesser extent.
3) PG, generally, has been good for the company. Bloody/risque matches have greater meaning, as do shocking/impressive spots. Although Hell in a Cell has tended to be a let-down in recent years, I'll admit. Also, the company is getting more support and good PR from things like anti-bullying (call it hypocritical, but honestly, bullies are heels, so it's not as if WWE ever condoned it anyway)
I may have only been part of this forum for a short while, but I've been in the IWC a lot longer, and a fan even longer than that. I get the feeling you are either new to this or quite young, so I'm trying to help you understand here. You give reasons for your points, true, but you haven't thought of the reasons behind the reasons. They're flimsy motives. You say, for example, that going back to TV-14 will make Vince more money. No it won't, he'll lose a bunch of his sponsors and possibly even some viewership. You also say that Brock Lesnar will return. Even suggesting that proves you don't really understand why Lesnar left in the first place. You use Linda's election campaign, but that happened quite a while ago, and even though WWE seemed to get almost Disney-like in its pursuit of "PGness", it loosened up afterwards and no-one's talking about that anymore, apart from you and now me.
It may seem like I'm being really patronising to you, but please understand that I'm just trying to show you the holes in your argument.