Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yes. 2005, when they were a .500 team, and the Eagles were below .500. Not now when they're both Super Bowl contenders. Face it Sly. There is no way that you can logically argue that Punk had any bearing on last night's game getting huge numbers and Raw's being low. None.
You seem to think I care about football's ratings. I don't. What I'm saying is that Punk is the reason Raw got low ratings. And I think I've proven my case sufficiently so. Your position is all conjecture and anecdotal evidence, where I've proven cold hard facts.
Not necessarily.Also, if Punk was the reason they didn't watch, wouldn't they turn back once his match was over?
No, video game over wrestling.Yet again, football over wrestling.
No, you don't have this right.So let me make sure I have this right. You feel that one of the longest running programs in tv history has the most popular team in the world featured that week for the only time all year, drawing the biggest rating ever in cable, wasn't the main factor in people not watching Raw?
Punk as a strong champ could have = ratings but vince messed up so congrats to vince he is killing wwe like he did the invasion angle and nwo angle
Why are we to assume it is one wrestler's fault that ratings are down at any certain time or period? I have stated time and time again that if they want ratings, the whole damn show (haha get it,) has to be great. Monday Night Football was greater yesterday. Next week, Raw has a better chance to win because Brett Farve leads the sad Jets into San Diego to play the winless Chargers.