FitFinlay4Life
What's the craic?
Easily Brock Lesnar here, not only does he have two notable wins over Triple H
Against a part time good guy Trips... hardly the Game's prime.
but Triple H has a habit of putting over young talent the WWE wants to push to the next level. Batista, John Cena, Daniel Bryan, The Shield fall into this category.
See first rebuttal for all but Batista and removing 'good guy'. Batista falls into the same category as Sheamus - a personal Triple H project. He doesn't like you... you ain't getting jack... I've never seen any evidence of Brock falling into that category.
Triple H also has a habit of putting over older talent who are popular amongst the fans, Chris Benoit, Hulk Hogan, Goldberg all fall into this category.
All after beating the likes of SCSA, the Rock, Kurt Angle and Y2J and completely ignoring the guy who received loads of stick for refusing to put over the likes of RVD, Kane and Booker T.
I don't see anyway Brock Lesnar loses this match. Not during the first encounter anyways.
When Brock was heading up the 'B' brand, Triple H was screwing everyone out of title's on the 'A' show.
Vote: Brock Lesnar
Triple H was once thought a sure in to beat Naith's World title count only for him to move more into a backstage capacity (showing his respect for the industry). I'll take him over a sulky meat-head with zero respect.