Alastor Whines and Lies | Page 2 | WrestleZone Forums

Alastor Whines and Lies

Status
Not open for further replies.
And there you go lying again, even after I've told you numerous times the untruth of your statement.

When you feel like you can quit lying, get back to me.

You ranted about Lebron not getting the regular season MVP. Equating it to Malone vs Jordan. I just said you were letting your fanboyism cloud your opinion on what Curry accomplished in the regular season.

If your intention wasn't to use the playoff performances to justify why he should have won why bring it up in the first place? Your attempt to deflect from this is hilarious.

Your first point to ridicule Iggy's MVP was to emphasize Iggy's points average in the series before bringing up Lebron's accomplishment.

Who's the liar now?
 
You ranted about Lebron not getting the regular season MVP.
No, I said it was ridiculous he didn't. You are lying again.

Equating it to Malone vs Jordan.
Yes and no. I didn't compare the "travesty" (for lack of a better word) of the two, I said the reason for it was similar.

I just said you were letting your fanboyism cloud your opinion on what Curry accomplished in the regular season.
Which is also a lie, as I haven't really said anything about Curry at all, with the exception of noting he's not as good as LeBron.

If your intention wasn't to use the playoff performances to justify why he should have won
I didn't. I never once said anything close to that. Seriously, learn how to comprehend what you read.

why bring it up in the first place?
Because LeBron was continuing to prove how ridiculous it was.

Do you really not understand the difference? Are you really so mentally inept you don't understand the difference between using James performances to stump for MVP and to show the ridiculousness of a decision? Are you incapable of making that distinction?

Here I'll use an example you might better understand. You have done nothing but continue to lie about why you received an Infraction for lying. You lying about why you received an infraction proves you are a liar. Your lying after the fact doesn't mean I would argue you deserve an infraction; you deserved the Infraction for what you did before the decision (like LeBron earned the MVP before it was voted). But your continued insistence on lying about it proves you are a liar and only proves I was right in Infracting you for being a liar (like James playoff performances proved the MVP vote was ridiculous).

Does that explanation help, little one?

Your first point to ridicule Iggy's MVP was to emphasize Iggy's points average in the series before bringing up Lebron's accomplishment.
Another lie, as I've explained multiple times now, including a response you then turned around and lied again.

Who's the liar now?
You are. As you have been from the very beginning. I made a statement, you presented it as something I never said. That, in itself, is not so bad...it happens. But you continue to claim I said it, even when I've explained multiple times I did not. That's what makes you a liar. You've lied about the Finals MVP, you lied in response to my response about Finals MVP and now you're lying about why you received an Infraction.

You're the liar. The fact you still don't seem to understand just how badly you've been lying lately, despite the fact all the evidence has clearly been laid out before you numerous times, suggests a deeper problem.

You are a liar. You have lied numerous times. I have pointed out and documented your numerous lies. You continue to lie about it. You are a liar.
 
No, I said it was ridiculous he didn't. You are lying again.
And ranted about it being just as 'laughable' as Malone vs Jordan.

Yes and no. I didn't compare the "travesty" (for lack of a better word) of the two, I said the reason for it was similar.
Except it wasn't voter fatigue for the awarding of the past two season's awards. Individual stats and team stats were highly favourable for the eventual winner. There were even multiple viable contenders for the awards this season not named Lebron or Curry.

Which is also a lie, as I haven't really said anything about Curry at all, with the exception of noting he's not as good as LeBron.
Saying only Lebron should win the award is implying you think Curry wasn't a deserving winner.

I didn't. I never once said anything close to that. Seriously, learn how to comprehend what you read.
I comprehend perfectly fine. You used one performance in one game to say Lebron deserve the regular season award.

Because LeBron was continuing to prove how ridiculous it was.
Except by your logic in the other thread, showing up for '33%' of the period for considerations of the award means the player is not deserving. Lebron 'showing up' for 50% of the period of considerations by your logic means the final decision wasn't ridiculous.

Do you really not understand the difference?
What difference?
Are you really so mentally inept you don't understand the difference between using James performances to stump for MVP and to show the ridiculousness of a decision?
You brought up the regular season MVP after a playoff game that was irrelevant to the award. How does that show the decision was ridiculous? What exactly is to stump for MVP? A question that we can never answer?

Are you incapable of making that distinction?
Repeating the same question.

Here I'll use an example you might better understand. You have done nothing but continue to lie about why you received an Infraction for lying. You lying about why you received an infraction proves you are a liar. Your lying after the fact doesn't mean I would argue you deserve an infraction; you deserved the Infraction for what you did before the decision (like LeBron earned the MVP before it was voted). But your continued insistence on lying about it proves you are a liar and only proves I was right in Infracting you for being a liar (like James playoff performances proved the MVP vote was ridiculous).
Don't bring me down to your rabbit hole.


Does that explanation help, little one?
No.

Another lie, as I've explained multiple times now, including a response you then turned around and lied again.
It isn't a lie. You brought up his low scoring in addition to your other points. Stop lying.

You are. As you have been from the very beginning. I made a statement, you presented it as something I never said. That, in itself, is not so bad...it happens. But you continue to claim I said it, even when I've explained multiple times I did not. That's what makes you a liar. You've lied about the Finals MVP, you lied in response to my response about Finals MVP and now you're lying about why you received an Infraction.

You're the liar. The fact you still don't seem to understand just how badly you've been lying lately, despite the fact all the evidence has clearly been laid out before you numerous times, suggests a deeper problem.

You are a liar. You have lied numerous times. I have pointed out and documented your numerous lies. You continue to lie about it. You are a liar.
Repeating the same lies isn't going to make them true. I wasn't lying, and repeating it wouldn't me a liar. You made a statement arguing about the regular season MVP decision. You used a playoff game as the basis of the argument. I argued the playoff game shouldn't be in the consideration
of the award. End of.

If anyone is a liar, you are. If you can infer from our argument that I am part of the 'anybody but Lebron' bandwagon and not be a liar, why am I being called a liar for stating that you were using playoff performances to ridicule a regular season award based on your continued bringing up of Lebron's playoff performances?
 
And ranted about it being just as 'laughable' as Malone vs Jordan.

Except it wasn't voter fatigue for the awarding of the past two season's awards. Individual stats and team stats were highly favourable for the eventual winner. There were even multiple viable contenders for the awards this season not named Lebron or Curry.

Saying only Lebron should win the award is implying you think Curry wasn't a deserving winner.

I comprehend perfectly fine. You used one performance in one game to say Lebron deserve the regular season award.

Except by your logic in the other thread, showing up for '33%' of the period for considerations of the award means the player is not deserving. Lebron 'showing up' for 50% of the period of considerations by your logic means the final decision wasn't ridiculous.

What difference?
You brought up the regular season MVP after a playoff game that was irrelevant to the award. How does that show the decision was ridiculous? What exactly is to stump for MVP? A question that we can never answer?

Repeating the same question.

Don't bring me down to your rabbit hole.


No.

It isn't a lie. You brought up his low scoring in addition to your other points. Stop lying.

Repeating the same lies isn't going to make them true. I wasn't lying, and repeating it wouldn't me a liar. You made a statement arguing about the regular season MVP decision. You used a playoff game as the basis of the argument. I argued the playoff game shouldn't be in the consideration
of the award. End of.

If anyone is a liar, you are. If you can infer from our argument that I am part of the 'anybody but Lebron' bandwagon and not be a liar, why am I being called a liar for stating that you were using playoff performances to ridicule a regular season award based on your continued bringing up of Lebron's playoff performances?
I didn't even read past the very first line where you lied and accused me of "ranting". Do you even realize how badly you lie and how utterly absurd you look?

This thread is closed. You obviously won't stop lying, no matter how many times I've proved you're a liar. When you think you can stop lying, let me know.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
174,846
Messages
3,300,837
Members
21,727
Latest member
alvarosamaniego
Back
Top