10/10/10! The TNA Bound For Glory LD

[klunderbunker]

So I've been thinking about this and I've come to two conclusions.

1. I'd expect to see a lot less wrestling in the coming months.

2. This makes sense when you really break it down and think things through. This however doesn't help things that much as I don't want to have to be a detective to understand a wrestling angle.

 

[Coco]

Jeff's court case isn't a work too, right?

When has legal trouble ever stopped Kurt Angle's push to nowhere?

 

[Tiger Chaos Theory]

Yeah, I know what I said earlier, shut up.

The only reason I was complaining was because I wanted a clean finish. I'm a clean finish kinda guy, so I'll always complain when there isn't a clean finish to the ME. This was heightened by the fact that this was BFG, so I expected a clean finish.

But after eating some chocolate chip pancakes and going over it in my head and the impact it will have on Impact, this could be just the thing to push Impact over in the ratings.

So I've been thinking about this and I've come to two conclusions.

1. I'd expect to see a lot less wrestling in the coming months.

2. This makes sense when you really break it down and think things through. This however doesn't help things that much as I don't want to have to be a detective to understand a wrestling angle.

2 is correct.

And 1 makes me sad : (

 

[JJYanks121]

So I've been thinking about this and I've come to two conclusions.

1. I'd expect to see a lot less wrestling in the coming months.

2. This makes sense when you really break it down and think things through. This however doesn't help things that much as I don't want to have to be a detective to understand a wrestling angle.

KB, I'm trying, I'm really trying to understand it. There are too many holes though. I've pointed them out already and the one guy who questioned my post picked and chose the points that would help him, leaving out half the shit I said. I stand by it and will until someone truly blows me away with an explanation, but it truly doesn't make sense, like at all.

The deception part does in that Sting always knew that Hogan and Bischoff were pieces of shit. They have always been on and off screen. That's about all that makes sense.

Deception was possibly meant for Hogan and Bischoff, but THEY was Heyman and this was a plan B. I completely stand by this and I believe it to be true. Otherwise, why was Abyss' turn ON HOGAN and the following promo cut saying Hogan would be out of a job when THEY arrive? Please, I would LOVE to hear someone explain this.

There's too much else to try and question, but I'd love explanations from the things I've just mentioned. Please, I'm begging someone to take my exact points and show me where I've gone wrong.

 

[ABMorales787]

KB, I'm trying, I'm really trying to understand it. There are too many holes though. I've pointed them out already and the one guy who questioned my post picked and chose the points that would help him, leaving out half the shit I said. I stand by it and will until someone truly blows me away with an explanation, but it truly doesn't make sense, like at all.

The deception part does in that Sting always knew that Hogan and Bischoff were pieces of shit. They have always been on and off screen. That's about all that makes sense.

Deception was possibly meant for Hogan and Bischoff, but THEY was Heyman and this was a plan B. I completely stand by this and I believe it to be true. Otherwise, why was Abyss' turn ON HOGAN and the following promo cut saying Hogan would be out of a job when THEY arrive? Please, I would LOVE to hear someone explain this.

There's too much else to try and question, but I'd love explanations from the things I've just mentioned. Please, I'm begging someone to take my exact points and show me where I've gone wrong.

Just how much do you think I can read? I've been on the defensive since the show ended! I... I...

I can't keep track of it ALL!!!!!!!!!

 

[klunderbunker]

KB, I'm trying, I'm really trying to understand it. There are too many holes though. I've pointed them out already and the one guy who questioned my post picked and chose the points that would help him, leaving out half the shit I said. I stand by it and will until someone truly blows me away with an explanation, but it truly doesn't make sense, like at all.

The deception part does in that Sting always knew that Hogan and Bischoff were pieces of shit. They have always been on and off screen. That's about all that makes sense.

Deception was possibly meant for Hogan and Bischoff, but THEY was Heyman and this was a plan B. I completely stand by this and I believe it to be true. Otherwise, why was Abyss' turn ON HOGAN and the following promo cut saying Hogan would be out of a job when THEY arrive? Please, I would LOVE to hear someone explain this.

There's too much else to try and question, but I'd love explanations from the things I've just mentioned. Please, I'm begging someone to take my exact points and show me where I've gone wrong.

My guess would be something along the lines of Hulk Hogan is gone and Hollywood Hogan is taking his place.

That or TNA just hopes you forget and no one asks questions.

 

[hatehabsforever]

So I've been thinking about this and I've come to two conclusions.

1. I'd expect to see a lot less wrestling in the coming months.

2. This makes sense when you really break it down and think things through. This however doesn't help things that much as I don't want to have to be a detective to understand a wrestling angle.

You are absolutely and without a doubt correct about point #1.

Not so much, though, about point #2. As I stated earlier elsewhere, over the last several weeks or even months, TNA has been throwing an absolute clusterf**k of happenings our way. Everything has been hinted. Everyone has had issues with everyone. No matter how things played out tonight, you could have justified it and made sense of it because of something that someone said or did earlier to validate it. Likewise, you can find evidence to make any way things played out tonight invalid as well.

Had they turned Angle instead of Hardy, it could be explained away because of something that someone said or did at some point over the last 3 or 4 months. Same applies to Anderson turning heel, or anything else. So I don't know if things truly made sense, or if it simply could be justified if you want to become Sherlock freakin' Holmes rather than a wrestling fan or viewer.

 

[JJYanks121]

[QUOTE="iMPACT! Player" Riaku;2508373]Just how much do you think I can read? I've been on the defensive since the show ended! I... I...

I can't keep track of it ALL!!!!!!!!![/QUOTE]

I kept it short man! And you know that I come to the TNA LDs when I can and have been following the product so I've seen it all but I've found way too many plot holes for this to make sense. It doesn't and I believe it to be a plan B (Heyman was plan A and would have been revealed a while ago but didn't sign so they went this way). I know you've defended it a bit, but I need someone to straighten me out. Be my savior!

 

[Tiger Chaos Theory]

What points need explaining, I'm set at 100 post per page and am not gonna go back through and try to read this?

 

[ABMorales787]

TNA NEEDS Xplosion as a 2 hour show on Spike. NOW!!

 

[klunderbunker]

What points need explaining, I'm set at 100 post per page and am not gonna go back through and try to read this?

I think the big ones are:

How could THEY be coming if every member of THEY was already there?

Why did Abyss say that THEY would put Hogan and Bischoff out of their jobs if Bischoff and Hogan were part of THEY?

Where do Sting and Nash fit in now?

Why have Abyss beat up Hardy so many times if Hardy is the crown jewel the whole time?

Why are we doing ANOTHER faction?

How long do you give this before it falls apart?

 

[Tiger Chaos Theory]

I think the big ones are:

How could THEY be coming if every member of THEY was already there?

A slight of hand if you will to throw people off their trail. Preparing for an attack from the outside makes it easier to attack with.

Why did Abyss say that THEY would put Hogan and Bischoff out of their jobs if Bischoff and Hogan were part of THEY?

Same as above. Why is it so illogical that heels would have their puppet lie about things?

Where do Sting and Nash fit in now?

Didn't you say yourself that Sting was always a face.

Why have Abyss beat up Hardy so many times if Hardy is the crown jewel the whole time?

Really a question left for Impact, but again, Abyss might have been asked to lose their matches so Hardy could look tougher and in a better position for the WHT.

Why are we doing ANOTHER faction?

No clue. Not defending the idea behind the angle, but I can defend the legitimacy of it.

How long do you give this before it falls apart?[/QUOTE]

I'm hoping Genesis.

 

[Kenny Powers]

Hogan and Bischoff turning heel wasn't shocking, but I didn't see Hardy turning. Didn't enjoy the way they ended the main event so soon. I wish it was Anderson instead of Hardy, but I guess Hardy is the bigger shocker. The outcome of this angle will all depend on how it plays out in the coming weeks on Impact. It could be a huge angle or a huge failure. I'm still disappointed that the rest of they was basically just Hogan, Bischoff, and Jarrett. The rest of the show was actually pretty good besides the ending to Lethal Lockdown. I'm just curious if this will alienate more fans then bring them in.

 

[Remy LaCroix]

Loved it!

 

[.]

Hardy was my first idea for "They". I had read a report about a week ago saying Hogan wanted to have a cool heel team with someone like Hardy. Still pretty well done. Now does this mean Sting and Dinero are faces?

Also Rhyno is done with TNA.