It's so telling when Bryan supporters have NO other arguments besides one match. Just ignore the fact Cena has had more great matches, was easily a bigger draw, was easily a bigger superstar and has defeated Bryan in several matches...it's all about one match where Bryan won a title he couldn't keep for more than five minutes.
John Cena is a better wrestler, better on the mic, has had more great matches, has drawn WAAAY more money and was a bigger superstar and did it much longer than Bryan. This match should be a squash.
Cena beat American Dragon, which was definitely not Bryan's prime. He's also beaten him on an episode of Raw, which was again, not Bryan's prime. What was Bryan's prime was well...the time he happened to beat John Cena for the WWE Championship & the following months after that. To give this match to Cena without thinking about it is beyond me.
So all the times Daniel Bryan lost to Cena should be ignored because "it wasn't his prime", but apparently when Cena lost a match to Bryan it was Cena's prime?
Yeah, NO problems with logic there at all.
If this is the 1st round of a 3 match tournament, Daniel Bryan is most definitely the guy who goes through these three rounds. Yeah, Cena could probably hold his own too, but I just don't see him going over Bryan. No matter how much more successful he's been, this all boils down to two things;
I could be wrong, but it REALLY looks like you're trying to argue Bryan wins this match because he could win the next two matches. Please tell me you have better logic than this. Because, if this is indeed your argument, it's one of the stupidest I've ever seen in the WZ Tournament. And that's saying something in a tournament where a wrestler lost because he never painted his shed.
Doesn't Daniel Bryan in his prime have a win over Cena?
Not over Cena in his prime.
The Daniel Bryan arguments have already started in full force ridiculousness. John Cena has numerous victories over Daniel Bryan, but we ignore all of them because of ONE match after Cena has begun stepping out of the major spotlight.
Complete and total lack of logic being displayed thus far by Bryan supporters. Which isn't surprising since there really isn't a lot of valid arguments to be made for Bryan.
Except for when he beat him, clean, 1-2-3 at the WWE's second biggest show?
NOT SO FAST MY FRIEND
One match after Cena had already begun stepping down in stature. Upsets happen, but it does mean the underdog is the better man/team.
For example, if Duke and Lehigh were to play a game of basketball tomorrow, would you give the advantage to Lehigh? I doubt it.
So...Daniel Bryan beats a severely injured probably near the end of his prime Cena once, and then loses the title in a shorter period of time than it takes your average person to *********e, and we should put him over Juan Cena?
I'm gonna throw this out there, and I'm probably gonna get yelled at and called a big stupid idiot, but whatever.
John Cena is a way better professional wrestler than Daniel Bryan, and it's not even close.
Vote Cena or Die.
Everything you said here is exactly correct. It's humorous how much value some people are putting in one match, as if that erases the enormous difference between the greatness achieved by Cena compared to Bryan.
Yes, thius match has been decided in the ring
Only if you ignore the other matches they have.
Logic is not strong in this thread from Bryan supporters.