Mustang Sally
Sells seashells by the seashore
My views have changed since the days after Summerslam, influenced by Cena's actions since that time. I thought we were going to get a "broken man" syndrome from him, with no Super Cena stuff on the horizon for many months. I never expected him to demand a rematch one month later......but since he has, it still seems impossible to believe he's going to wipe the mat with Brock Lesnar.
First, why destroy Brock's momentum in just 30 days time? Isn't that totally counterproductive? Why do this program in the first place if you want to tear it down so quickly?
The only reason I can see having Cena win and taking back his title is the "mercenary" status of Lesnar. As many on this forum have been saying, giving him the world title in the first place is ridiculous since he's rarely around to defend it. The fact he's appearing on two PPVs in a row is a huge departure from Brock's deal with WWE.
Second, with so many people disgusted with the "Super Cena" character, why toss it in everyone's face by having him defeat the guy who just destroyed him? What would have changed in 30 days to alter the result so radically? Sure, we know Cena "never gives up" but I really figured management was going to give him time to recover from the worst defeat of his career before throwing him back in there.
It's tough to predict what happens at Night of Champions......which is good, given the number of folks on this forum who claim to know in advance everything WWE is going to do (and are proud to inform us of it after the match is over ) but my guess is this: Cena and Brock put on an amazing match.....give & take all the way.....extreme bravery shown by both.....frequent 2-counts by the ref that have the crowd squirming and chanting.....both men pushing each other to the limits of their endurance. In the end, Brock wins but fans have a renewed appreciation of Cena.
Either that.....or there's a big-time swerve coming. For instance, if Cena loses and the fans boo him anyway, perhaps the long-awaited heel turn results.
First, why destroy Brock's momentum in just 30 days time? Isn't that totally counterproductive? Why do this program in the first place if you want to tear it down so quickly?
The only reason I can see having Cena win and taking back his title is the "mercenary" status of Lesnar. As many on this forum have been saying, giving him the world title in the first place is ridiculous since he's rarely around to defend it. The fact he's appearing on two PPVs in a row is a huge departure from Brock's deal with WWE.
Second, with so many people disgusted with the "Super Cena" character, why toss it in everyone's face by having him defeat the guy who just destroyed him? What would have changed in 30 days to alter the result so radically? Sure, we know Cena "never gives up" but I really figured management was going to give him time to recover from the worst defeat of his career before throwing him back in there.
It's tough to predict what happens at Night of Champions......which is good, given the number of folks on this forum who claim to know in advance everything WWE is going to do (and are proud to inform us of it after the match is over ) but my guess is this: Cena and Brock put on an amazing match.....give & take all the way.....extreme bravery shown by both.....frequent 2-counts by the ref that have the crowd squirming and chanting.....both men pushing each other to the limits of their endurance. In the end, Brock wins but fans have a renewed appreciation of Cena.
Either that.....or there's a big-time swerve coming. For instance, if Cena loses and the fans boo him anyway, perhaps the long-awaited heel turn results.