Every year, around this time especially, people voice their opinions on who should be in the HOF. One constant is Davey Boy Smith/The British Bulldogs. While I agree that either Davey on his own and/or the team should be inducted, I am curious about another point that I have seen made several times. I have seen a lot of suggestions or theories that as long as Dynamite Kid is alive, Vince will not induct the Bulldogs. While this is a bit morbid for my taste, I do understand the possible reasoning that it is due to all of the trouble Dynamite has caused/the shape he is in.
So, I have a few questions...
1) Does a performer (or the kin of a performer) need to give their permission for induction?
2) Has there been an induction where an inductee (member of a team perhaps) was alive, but not in attendance during the induction?
It may be awkward/odd/"not worth it" to induct, in this example, the British Bulldogs with the only living teammate not in attendance; but, I think this "waiting for ____ to die" theory is terrible. It may very well be true, and I can't change the different ways that different people view death. I'm just saying, personally, the thought of waiting for a person to die to ultimately get a tag team into a Hall of Fame...it just rubs me the wrong way.
I'm not trying to change the world and the different views/opinions of people. I am only basing this off of my feelings. I also realize this is a very rare occurrence, as one might think "If WWE doesn't feel they are worthy of an invitation, why are they worthy of induction?" While, on the surface, that seems like a fair question, I think it is very possible to have had a career worth honoring, despite the current state of the relationship between that performer and WWE.
So, I am wondering, is there any precedent for a living inductee not being invited/in attendance for their induction? If not, is the idea of inducting the Bulldogs without inviting Dynamite to the ceremony feasible?