Were you sent by the WWE?
Anyway, I actually quite like this. I think it's kind of cool how there's actually a real reason to strip Taker of the world title. However, I would have liked it if they didn't have Ryder and whatever the hell the other one's called take the belt back straight away. They should have had SmackDown's biggest stars try each week to get the belt off of him and fail, leading to a big guantlet or something. Sure, it would've had to have lasted longer than what they're probably doing, but it would've been much better.
One thing I'd like to point out (and don't talk any further about this because this isn't the thread for it) is that if Cena was stripped of the world title and had a match with just a kick and a submission everybody'd be pissed off about how lazy he is and how they're making him look like an underdog again, but in a different way. After all, that's what Taker is: wrestling's biggest underdog. Thanks for that line, Jake.
Anyway, I actually quite like this. I think it's kind of cool how there's actually a real reason to strip Taker of the world title. However, I would have liked it if they didn't have Ryder and whatever the hell the other one's called take the belt back straight away. They should have had SmackDown's biggest stars try each week to get the belt off of him and fail, leading to a big guantlet or something. Sure, it would've had to have lasted longer than what they're probably doing, but it would've been much better.
One thing I'd like to point out (and don't talk any further about this because this isn't the thread for it) is that if Cena was stripped of the world title and had a match with just a kick and a submission everybody'd be pissed off about how lazy he is and how they're making him look like an underdog again, but in a different way. After all, that's what Taker is: wrestling's biggest underdog. Thanks for that line, Jake.