Just as long as you also feel the need to bash the millions and millions of people who have been helped because of Christians' charitable donations, homes built by Christians, Christian missionaries who brought schools, electricity, food, medicine etc to the poorest of the poor in Africa, it was Christians that led the charge to end slavery in the United States, etc...
If they have earned their "bashing", then by all means, continue to bash. But, make sure you bash everything they do, instead of having such a one sided viewpoint, because you didn't bother to find out if there was another side to it. Bash all the good Christianity is responsible for. Bash Mother Theresa. Bash the millions of lives that were saved because of Christian missionary work. Bash the fact that in the United States, Christians donate a much higher percentage of their incomes to charity than any other group. While non-Christians are busy bashing Christians, those same Christians are giving up their time and money to help those who are bashing them.
Why would I bash the good things Christianity has done? That doesn't make sense. Who criticizes good things?
That's not what the thread starter was talking about, the thread starter was talking about criticisms, and criticisms only come from the bad things a religion does. So, if somebody does something good, suddenly they can no longer be criticized? That's completely asinine.
The Christian religion has so much that can be criticized, whether it be it's own internal structure, or its actions upon the world. Nobody has denied the good things the religion has done, although I will say that many of the good things the Church has done has been self-serving, but all the same, it's helpful. And there are some very good people who are Christians, who do wonderful things for others. Nobody denies that.
But to say we can't criticize the Christian religion is just absurd, especially when there is so much to criticize. So I will bash it, when I think appropriate.
If you are going to blame Christians for the actions of a few, then I am going to turn it around. Atheism is far more dangerous than Christianity ever was. Joseph Stalin was an atheist, he outlawed God...and he intentionally killed 40,000,000 of his own people, just 60 years ago. Why don't you talk about the brutality of YOUR beliefs?
First of all, who said I was an atheist? Typical Christian, jumping to conclusions.
Second of all, while I see what you're trying to say, you're completely off. Atheism isn't a belief, it's not a sect or set of principles. Atheism is the absence of belief in a divine power, and as such, can not be treated the same as Christianity. Every atheist is individual to himself...every Christian belongs to the Christian religion.
While I see what you're trying to say, you're looking at it completely wrong. You can't group all atheists together, because the very fact they're atheists denies that ability. Christians willingly belong to a "club" so to speak, atheists choose not to be part of any club.
Good try, but it was a failure.
I agree about the corruption in the church, and I'm not defending the mega-churches who are just in it for the money, I'm defending the actual churches, no matter what denomination, stand up for what they believe in and truly believe what they're saying. But, while some have been slaughtered by "Christians", how many Christians have been slaughtered? It's a what goes around comes around process, really.
I'm not here to defend anyone who does anything immoral or illegal. I'm not here saying that Christianity is bad and "x" religion is good, or that atheism is the way to go.
What I'm merely saying is there are plenty of reasons to bash Christianity, all of which are completely legitimate.